Cargando…

Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire

OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the original, and the revised version of the Dutch Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). To explore the effect of different score calculation methods and eight more challenging items as proposed by Lam et al. (2004) on the score distribution in a population of pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouwerkerk, Jessika W, van Pelt, Philomine A, Takken, Tim, Helders, Paul JM, Net, Janjaap van der
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2546387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18786245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-6-14
_version_ 1782159188996128768
author Ouwerkerk, Jessika W
van Pelt, Philomine A
Takken, Tim
Helders, Paul JM
Net, Janjaap van der
author_facet Ouwerkerk, Jessika W
van Pelt, Philomine A
Takken, Tim
Helders, Paul JM
Net, Janjaap van der
author_sort Ouwerkerk, Jessika W
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the original, and the revised version of the Dutch Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). To explore the effect of different score calculation methods and eight more challenging items as proposed by Lam et al. (2004) on the score distribution in a population of patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Two convenience samples of 59 and 31 children with JIA were studied. Box-and-whisker plots and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) one-sample test of normality were used, to explore the score distributions. RESULTS: The results of this study confirm a ceiling effect when using the original CHAQ-30 with either score calculation method. The original CHAQ with the added eight more challenging items and the "mean" score calculation method, as well as the revised CHAQ showed less ceiling effect. CONCLUSION: The original CHAQ-38 with the "mean" score calculation method as well as the revised CHAQ are a possible alternative for future studies. However, there is a need for further prospective studies to improve the CHAQ and to support our findings.
format Text
id pubmed-2546387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25463872008-09-20 Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Ouwerkerk, Jessika W van Pelt, Philomine A Takken, Tim Helders, Paul JM Net, Janjaap van der Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Research OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the original, and the revised version of the Dutch Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). To explore the effect of different score calculation methods and eight more challenging items as proposed by Lam et al. (2004) on the score distribution in a population of patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Two convenience samples of 59 and 31 children with JIA were studied. Box-and-whisker plots and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) one-sample test of normality were used, to explore the score distributions. RESULTS: The results of this study confirm a ceiling effect when using the original CHAQ-30 with either score calculation method. The original CHAQ with the added eight more challenging items and the "mean" score calculation method, as well as the revised CHAQ showed less ceiling effect. CONCLUSION: The original CHAQ-38 with the "mean" score calculation method as well as the revised CHAQ are a possible alternative for future studies. However, there is a need for further prospective studies to improve the CHAQ and to support our findings. BioMed Central 2008-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2546387/ /pubmed/18786245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-6-14 Text en Copyright © 2008 Ouwerkerk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ouwerkerk, Jessika W
van Pelt, Philomine A
Takken, Tim
Helders, Paul JM
Net, Janjaap van der
Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire
title Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire
title_full Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire
title_fullStr Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire
title_short Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire
title_sort evaluating score distributions in the revised dutch version of the childhood health assessment questionnaire
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2546387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18786245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-6-14
work_keys_str_mv AT ouwerkerkjessikaw evaluatingscoredistributionsinthereviseddutchversionofthechildhoodhealthassessmentquestionnaire
AT vanpeltphilominea evaluatingscoredistributionsinthereviseddutchversionofthechildhoodhealthassessmentquestionnaire
AT takkentim evaluatingscoredistributionsinthereviseddutchversionofthechildhoodhealthassessmentquestionnaire
AT helderspauljm evaluatingscoredistributionsinthereviseddutchversionofthechildhoodhealthassessmentquestionnaire
AT netjanjaapvander evaluatingscoredistributionsinthereviseddutchversionofthechildhoodhealthassessmentquestionnaire