Cargando…
Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire
OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the original, and the revised version of the Dutch Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). To explore the effect of different score calculation methods and eight more challenging items as proposed by Lam et al. (2004) on the score distribution in a population of pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2546387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18786245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-6-14 |
_version_ | 1782159188996128768 |
---|---|
author | Ouwerkerk, Jessika W van Pelt, Philomine A Takken, Tim Helders, Paul JM Net, Janjaap van der |
author_facet | Ouwerkerk, Jessika W van Pelt, Philomine A Takken, Tim Helders, Paul JM Net, Janjaap van der |
author_sort | Ouwerkerk, Jessika W |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the original, and the revised version of the Dutch Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). To explore the effect of different score calculation methods and eight more challenging items as proposed by Lam et al. (2004) on the score distribution in a population of patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Two convenience samples of 59 and 31 children with JIA were studied. Box-and-whisker plots and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) one-sample test of normality were used, to explore the score distributions. RESULTS: The results of this study confirm a ceiling effect when using the original CHAQ-30 with either score calculation method. The original CHAQ with the added eight more challenging items and the "mean" score calculation method, as well as the revised CHAQ showed less ceiling effect. CONCLUSION: The original CHAQ-38 with the "mean" score calculation method as well as the revised CHAQ are a possible alternative for future studies. However, there is a need for further prospective studies to improve the CHAQ and to support our findings. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2546387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25463872008-09-20 Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Ouwerkerk, Jessika W van Pelt, Philomine A Takken, Tim Helders, Paul JM Net, Janjaap van der Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Research OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the original, and the revised version of the Dutch Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). To explore the effect of different score calculation methods and eight more challenging items as proposed by Lam et al. (2004) on the score distribution in a population of patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Two convenience samples of 59 and 31 children with JIA were studied. Box-and-whisker plots and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) one-sample test of normality were used, to explore the score distributions. RESULTS: The results of this study confirm a ceiling effect when using the original CHAQ-30 with either score calculation method. The original CHAQ with the added eight more challenging items and the "mean" score calculation method, as well as the revised CHAQ showed less ceiling effect. CONCLUSION: The original CHAQ-38 with the "mean" score calculation method as well as the revised CHAQ are a possible alternative for future studies. However, there is a need for further prospective studies to improve the CHAQ and to support our findings. BioMed Central 2008-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2546387/ /pubmed/18786245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-6-14 Text en Copyright © 2008 Ouwerkerk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ouwerkerk, Jessika W van Pelt, Philomine A Takken, Tim Helders, Paul JM Net, Janjaap van der Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire |
title | Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire |
title_full | Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire |
title_short | Evaluating score distributions in the revised Dutch version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire |
title_sort | evaluating score distributions in the revised dutch version of the childhood health assessment questionnaire |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2546387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18786245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-6-14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ouwerkerkjessikaw evaluatingscoredistributionsinthereviseddutchversionofthechildhoodhealthassessmentquestionnaire AT vanpeltphilominea evaluatingscoredistributionsinthereviseddutchversionofthechildhoodhealthassessmentquestionnaire AT takkentim evaluatingscoredistributionsinthereviseddutchversionofthechildhoodhealthassessmentquestionnaire AT helderspauljm evaluatingscoredistributionsinthereviseddutchversionofthechildhoodhealthassessmentquestionnaire AT netjanjaapvander evaluatingscoredistributionsinthereviseddutchversionofthechildhoodhealthassessmentquestionnaire |