Cargando…

Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclastic bone resorption. With their individually proven efficacy to significantly reduce the incidence of vertebral and/or non-vertebral fractures and with their overall beneficial safety profile, alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bock, Oliver, Felsenberg, Dieter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2546473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18686751
_version_ 1782159204885200896
author Bock, Oliver
Felsenberg, Dieter
author_facet Bock, Oliver
Felsenberg, Dieter
author_sort Bock, Oliver
collection PubMed
description Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclastic bone resorption. With their individually proven efficacy to significantly reduce the incidence of vertebral and/or non-vertebral fractures and with their overall beneficial safety profile, alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate are considered today a treatment of first choice in postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, treatment effects in an individual patient and cost-effectiveness in public health perspective are vitally dependent on the long-term patient adherence as well as on compliance and persistence. As compliance and persistence with daily oral bisphosphonates are shown to be suboptimal in many patients, leading to an increased fracture incidence in non-compliant patients, there is a need to improve overall adherence for bisphosphonate treatment in order to achieve maximum treatment effects. One option is to extend dosing intervals to weekly (alendronate, risedronate) or monthly (ibandronate) oral regimens. Less frequent oral regimens are generally preferred by majority of patients. Another alternative is intravenous, instead of oral application (ibandronate, zoledronate). Treatment acceptance could be further improved by IV bisphosphonates with their benefit of only quarterly, or even once-yearly, application. Treatment decisions should be based on anti-fracture efficacy data first. In addition, to ensure best possible patient adherence and maximum treatment benefits, physicians should consider individual patient conditions affecting compliance and persistence as well as patient preferences.
format Text
id pubmed-2546473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25464732009-05-20 Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice Bock, Oliver Felsenberg, Dieter Clin Interv Aging Review Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclastic bone resorption. With their individually proven efficacy to significantly reduce the incidence of vertebral and/or non-vertebral fractures and with their overall beneficial safety profile, alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate are considered today a treatment of first choice in postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, treatment effects in an individual patient and cost-effectiveness in public health perspective are vitally dependent on the long-term patient adherence as well as on compliance and persistence. As compliance and persistence with daily oral bisphosphonates are shown to be suboptimal in many patients, leading to an increased fracture incidence in non-compliant patients, there is a need to improve overall adherence for bisphosphonate treatment in order to achieve maximum treatment effects. One option is to extend dosing intervals to weekly (alendronate, risedronate) or monthly (ibandronate) oral regimens. Less frequent oral regimens are generally preferred by majority of patients. Another alternative is intravenous, instead of oral application (ibandronate, zoledronate). Treatment acceptance could be further improved by IV bisphosphonates with their benefit of only quarterly, or even once-yearly, application. Treatment decisions should be based on anti-fracture efficacy data first. In addition, to ensure best possible patient adherence and maximum treatment benefits, physicians should consider individual patient conditions affecting compliance and persistence as well as patient preferences. Dove Medical Press 2008-06 2008-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2546473/ /pubmed/18686751 Text en © 2008 Dove Medical Press Limited. All rights reserved
spellingShingle Review
Bock, Oliver
Felsenberg, Dieter
Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice
title Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice
title_full Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice
title_fullStr Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice
title_short Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice
title_sort bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2546473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18686751
work_keys_str_mv AT bockoliver bisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpostmenopausalosteoporosisoptimizingefficacyinclinicalpractice
AT felsenbergdieter bisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpostmenopausalosteoporosisoptimizingefficacyinclinicalpractice