Cargando…

Measuring microRNAs: Comparisons of microarray and quantitative PCR measurements, and of different total RNA prep methods

BACKGROUND: Determining the expression levels of microRNAs (miRNAs) is of great interest to researchers in many areas of biology, given the significant roles these molecules play in cellular regulation. Two common methods for measuring miRNAs in a total RNA sample are microarrays and quantitative RT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ach, Robert A, Wang, Hui, Curry, Bo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18783629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-8-69
_version_ 1782159211721916416
author Ach, Robert A
Wang, Hui
Curry, Bo
author_facet Ach, Robert A
Wang, Hui
Curry, Bo
author_sort Ach, Robert A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Determining the expression levels of microRNAs (miRNAs) is of great interest to researchers in many areas of biology, given the significant roles these molecules play in cellular regulation. Two common methods for measuring miRNAs in a total RNA sample are microarrays and quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR). To understand the results of studies that use these two different techniques to measure miRNAs, it is important to understand how well the results of these two analysis methods correlate. Since both methods use total RNA as a starting material, it is also critical to understand how measurement of miRNAs might be affected by the particular method of total RNA preparation used. RESULTS: We measured the expression of 470 human miRNAs in nine human tissues using Agilent microarrays, and compared these results to qPCR profiles of 61 miRNAs in the same tissues. Most expressed miRNAs (53/60) correlated well (R > 0.9) between the two methods. Using spiked-in synthetic miRNAs, we further examined the two miRNAs with the lowest correlations, and found the differences cannot be attributed to differential sensitivity of the two methods. We also tested three widely-used total RNA sample prep methods using miRNA microarrays. We found that while almost all miRNA levels correspond between the three methods, there were a few miRNAs whose levels consistently differed between the different prep techniques when measured by microarray analysis. These differences were corroborated by qPCR measurements. CONCLUSION: The correlations between Agilent miRNA microarray results and qPCR results are generally excellent, as are the correlations between different total RNA prep methods. However, there are a few miRNAs whose levels do not correlate between the microarray and qPCR measurements, or between different sample prep methods. Researchers should therefore take care when comparing results obtained using different analysis or sample preparation methods.
format Text
id pubmed-2547107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25471072008-09-23 Measuring microRNAs: Comparisons of microarray and quantitative PCR measurements, and of different total RNA prep methods Ach, Robert A Wang, Hui Curry, Bo BMC Biotechnol Research Article BACKGROUND: Determining the expression levels of microRNAs (miRNAs) is of great interest to researchers in many areas of biology, given the significant roles these molecules play in cellular regulation. Two common methods for measuring miRNAs in a total RNA sample are microarrays and quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR). To understand the results of studies that use these two different techniques to measure miRNAs, it is important to understand how well the results of these two analysis methods correlate. Since both methods use total RNA as a starting material, it is also critical to understand how measurement of miRNAs might be affected by the particular method of total RNA preparation used. RESULTS: We measured the expression of 470 human miRNAs in nine human tissues using Agilent microarrays, and compared these results to qPCR profiles of 61 miRNAs in the same tissues. Most expressed miRNAs (53/60) correlated well (R > 0.9) between the two methods. Using spiked-in synthetic miRNAs, we further examined the two miRNAs with the lowest correlations, and found the differences cannot be attributed to differential sensitivity of the two methods. We also tested three widely-used total RNA sample prep methods using miRNA microarrays. We found that while almost all miRNA levels correspond between the three methods, there were a few miRNAs whose levels consistently differed between the different prep techniques when measured by microarray analysis. These differences were corroborated by qPCR measurements. CONCLUSION: The correlations between Agilent miRNA microarray results and qPCR results are generally excellent, as are the correlations between different total RNA prep methods. However, there are a few miRNAs whose levels do not correlate between the microarray and qPCR measurements, or between different sample prep methods. Researchers should therefore take care when comparing results obtained using different analysis or sample preparation methods. BioMed Central 2008-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2547107/ /pubmed/18783629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-8-69 Text en Copyright © 2008 Ach et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ach, Robert A
Wang, Hui
Curry, Bo
Measuring microRNAs: Comparisons of microarray and quantitative PCR measurements, and of different total RNA prep methods
title Measuring microRNAs: Comparisons of microarray and quantitative PCR measurements, and of different total RNA prep methods
title_full Measuring microRNAs: Comparisons of microarray and quantitative PCR measurements, and of different total RNA prep methods
title_fullStr Measuring microRNAs: Comparisons of microarray and quantitative PCR measurements, and of different total RNA prep methods
title_full_unstemmed Measuring microRNAs: Comparisons of microarray and quantitative PCR measurements, and of different total RNA prep methods
title_short Measuring microRNAs: Comparisons of microarray and quantitative PCR measurements, and of different total RNA prep methods
title_sort measuring micrornas: comparisons of microarray and quantitative pcr measurements, and of different total rna prep methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18783629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-8-69
work_keys_str_mv AT achroberta measuringmicrornascomparisonsofmicroarrayandquantitativepcrmeasurementsandofdifferenttotalrnaprepmethods
AT wanghui measuringmicrornascomparisonsofmicroarrayandquantitativepcrmeasurementsandofdifferenttotalrnaprepmethods
AT currybo measuringmicrornascomparisonsofmicroarrayandquantitativepcrmeasurementsandofdifferenttotalrnaprepmethods