Cargando…

Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI

This article reports an evaluation of the Coulter Counter model S-Plus VI automatic analyser for haematology, and data are presented on linearity, carry-over, precision, accuracy and stability of the instrument, when compared with a model S-Plus IV/D. The three-part differential count provided by Co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banfi, Giuseppe, Pontillo, Marina, Notti, Paola, Bonini, Pierangelo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1988
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924688000094
_version_ 1782159326354341888
author Banfi, Giuseppe
Pontillo, Marina
Notti, Paola
Bonini, Pierangelo
author_facet Banfi, Giuseppe
Pontillo, Marina
Notti, Paola
Bonini, Pierangelo
author_sort Banfi, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description This article reports an evaluation of the Coulter Counter model S-Plus VI automatic analyser for haematology, and data are presented on linearity, carry-over, precision, accuracy and stability of the instrument, when compared with a model S-Plus IV/D. The three-part differential count provided by Coulter S-Plus VI has been compared with manual eye counting. The results show a good agreement with only 2.5% of discrepancies in 2271 routine samples. Advantages of the new instrument include: reduction of running costs, largely due to manpower saving; simple and easy use, and improved operator safety, there being no need for human contact with blood.
format Text
id pubmed-2547730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1988
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25477302008-10-16 Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI Banfi, Giuseppe Pontillo, Marina Notti, Paola Bonini, Pierangelo J Automat Chem Research Article This article reports an evaluation of the Coulter Counter model S-Plus VI automatic analyser for haematology, and data are presented on linearity, carry-over, precision, accuracy and stability of the instrument, when compared with a model S-Plus IV/D. The three-part differential count provided by Coulter S-Plus VI has been compared with manual eye counting. The results show a good agreement with only 2.5% of discrepancies in 2271 routine samples. Advantages of the new instrument include: reduction of running costs, largely due to manpower saving; simple and easy use, and improved operator safety, there being no need for human contact with blood. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1988 /pmc/articles/PMC2547730/ /pubmed/18925186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924688000094 Text en Copyright © 1988 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Banfi, Giuseppe
Pontillo, Marina
Notti, Paola
Bonini, Pierangelo
Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI
title Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI
title_full Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI
title_short Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI
title_sort evaluation of the coulter counter s-plus vi
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924688000094
work_keys_str_mv AT banfigiuseppe evaluationofthecoultercountersplusvi
AT pontillomarina evaluationofthecoultercountersplusvi
AT nottipaola evaluationofthecoultercountersplusvi
AT boninipierangelo evaluationofthecoultercountersplusvi