Cargando…
Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI
This article reports an evaluation of the Coulter Counter model S-Plus VI automatic analyser for haematology, and data are presented on linearity, carry-over, precision, accuracy and stability of the instrument, when compared with a model S-Plus IV/D. The three-part differential count provided by Co...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
1988
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924688000094 |
_version_ | 1782159326354341888 |
---|---|
author | Banfi, Giuseppe Pontillo, Marina Notti, Paola Bonini, Pierangelo |
author_facet | Banfi, Giuseppe Pontillo, Marina Notti, Paola Bonini, Pierangelo |
author_sort | Banfi, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article reports an evaluation of the Coulter Counter model S-Plus VI automatic analyser for haematology, and data are presented on linearity, carry-over, precision, accuracy and stability of the instrument, when compared with a model S-Plus IV/D. The three-part differential count provided by Coulter S-Plus VI has been compared with manual eye counting. The results show a good agreement with only 2.5% of discrepancies in 2271 routine samples. Advantages of the new instrument include: reduction of running costs, largely due to manpower saving; simple and easy use, and improved operator safety, there being no need for human contact with blood. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2547730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1988 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25477302008-10-16 Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI Banfi, Giuseppe Pontillo, Marina Notti, Paola Bonini, Pierangelo J Automat Chem Research Article This article reports an evaluation of the Coulter Counter model S-Plus VI automatic analyser for haematology, and data are presented on linearity, carry-over, precision, accuracy and stability of the instrument, when compared with a model S-Plus IV/D. The three-part differential count provided by Coulter S-Plus VI has been compared with manual eye counting. The results show a good agreement with only 2.5% of discrepancies in 2271 routine samples. Advantages of the new instrument include: reduction of running costs, largely due to manpower saving; simple and easy use, and improved operator safety, there being no need for human contact with blood. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1988 /pmc/articles/PMC2547730/ /pubmed/18925186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924688000094 Text en Copyright © 1988 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Banfi, Giuseppe Pontillo, Marina Notti, Paola Bonini, Pierangelo Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI |
title | Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI |
title_full | Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI |
title_short | Evaluation of the Coulter Counter S-Plus VI |
title_sort | evaluation of the coulter counter s-plus vi |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924688000094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banfigiuseppe evaluationofthecoultercountersplusvi AT pontillomarina evaluationofthecoultercountersplusvi AT nottipaola evaluationofthecoultercountersplusvi AT boninipierangelo evaluationofthecoultercountersplusvi |