Cargando…
Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology
Three autoanalysers, the EPOS 5060, ERIS 6170 and the Analyst, were evaluated for their adequacy for use in laboratories attached to Saudi ‘polyclinics’. All the analysers showed comparable within-batch imprecision. The Analyst was found to be the most useful because it was simple and practical and...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
1990
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924690000244 |
_version_ | 1782159350931914752 |
---|---|
author | Narebor, E. M. |
author_facet | Narebor, E. M. |
author_sort | Narebor, E. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Three autoanalysers, the EPOS 5060, ERIS 6170 and the Analyst, were evaluated for their adequacy for use in laboratories attached to Saudi ‘polyclinics’. All the analysers showed comparable within-batch imprecision. The Analyst was found to be the most useful because it was simple and practical and because its throughput time was faster than the other two analysers. The EPOS 5060 would be more suitable for screening large numbers of samples for single parameters; and the ERIS 6170 essentially suits normal routine chemical laboratory work. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2547835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1990 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25478352008-10-16 Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology Narebor, E. M. J Automat Chem Research Article Three autoanalysers, the EPOS 5060, ERIS 6170 and the Analyst, were evaluated for their adequacy for use in laboratories attached to Saudi ‘polyclinics’. All the analysers showed comparable within-batch imprecision. The Analyst was found to be the most useful because it was simple and practical and because its throughput time was faster than the other two analysers. The EPOS 5060 would be more suitable for screening large numbers of samples for single parameters; and the ERIS 6170 essentially suits normal routine chemical laboratory work. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1990 /pmc/articles/PMC2547835/ /pubmed/18925273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924690000244 Text en Copyright © 1990 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Narebor, E. M. Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology |
title | Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology |
title_full | Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology |
title_fullStr | Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology |
title_short | Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology |
title_sort | technical note: evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924690000244 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nareborem technicalnoteevaluationofthreeautoanalysersforuseinchemicalpathology |