Cargando…

Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology

Three autoanalysers, the EPOS 5060, ERIS 6170 and the Analyst, were evaluated for their adequacy for use in laboratories attached to Saudi ‘polyclinics’. All the analysers showed comparable within-batch imprecision. The Analyst was found to be the most useful because it was simple and practical and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Narebor, E. M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1990
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924690000244
_version_ 1782159350931914752
author Narebor, E. M.
author_facet Narebor, E. M.
author_sort Narebor, E. M.
collection PubMed
description Three autoanalysers, the EPOS 5060, ERIS 6170 and the Analyst, were evaluated for their adequacy for use in laboratories attached to Saudi ‘polyclinics’. All the analysers showed comparable within-batch imprecision. The Analyst was found to be the most useful because it was simple and practical and because its throughput time was faster than the other two analysers. The EPOS 5060 would be more suitable for screening large numbers of samples for single parameters; and the ERIS 6170 essentially suits normal routine chemical laboratory work.
format Text
id pubmed-2547835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1990
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25478352008-10-16 Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology Narebor, E. M. J Automat Chem Research Article Three autoanalysers, the EPOS 5060, ERIS 6170 and the Analyst, were evaluated for their adequacy for use in laboratories attached to Saudi ‘polyclinics’. All the analysers showed comparable within-batch imprecision. The Analyst was found to be the most useful because it was simple and practical and because its throughput time was faster than the other two analysers. The EPOS 5060 would be more suitable for screening large numbers of samples for single parameters; and the ERIS 6170 essentially suits normal routine chemical laboratory work. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1990 /pmc/articles/PMC2547835/ /pubmed/18925273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924690000244 Text en Copyright © 1990 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Narebor, E. M.
Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology
title Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology
title_full Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology
title_fullStr Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology
title_full_unstemmed Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology
title_short Technical note: Evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology
title_sort technical note: evaluation of three autoanalysers for use in chemical pathology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1463924690000244
work_keys_str_mv AT nareborem technicalnoteevaluationofthreeautoanalysersforuseinchemicalpathology