Cargando…

Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution

BACKGROUND: Arguably the most influential force in human history is the formation of social coalitions and alliances (i.e., long-lasting coalitions) and their impact on individual power. Understanding the dynamics of alliance formation and its consequences for biological, social, and cultural evolut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gavrilets, Sergey, Duenez-Guzman, Edgar A., Vose, Michael D.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18827928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003293
_version_ 1782159357020995584
author Gavrilets, Sergey
Duenez-Guzman, Edgar A.
Vose, Michael D.
author_facet Gavrilets, Sergey
Duenez-Guzman, Edgar A.
Vose, Michael D.
author_sort Gavrilets, Sergey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Arguably the most influential force in human history is the formation of social coalitions and alliances (i.e., long-lasting coalitions) and their impact on individual power. Understanding the dynamics of alliance formation and its consequences for biological, social, and cultural evolution is a formidable theoretical challenge. In most great ape species, coalitions occur at individual and group levels and among both kin and non-kin. Nonetheless, ape societies remain essentially hierarchical, and coalitions rarely weaken social inequality. In contrast, human hunter-gatherers show a remarkable tendency to egalitarianism, and human coalitions and alliances occur not only among individuals and groups, but also among groups of groups. These observations suggest that the evolutionary dynamics of human coalitions can only be understood in the context of social networks and cognitive evolution. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we develop a stochastic model describing the emergence of networks of allies resulting from within-group competition for status or mates between individuals utilizing dyadic information. The model shows that alliances often emerge in a phase transition-like fashion if the group size, awareness, aggressiveness, and persuasiveness of individuals are large and the decay rate of individual affinities is small. With cultural inheritance of social networks, a single leveling alliance including all group members can emerge in several generations. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We propose a simple and flexible theoretical approach for studying the dynamics of alliance emergence applicable where game-theoretic methods are not practical. Our approach is both scalable and expandable. It is scalable in that it can be generalized to larger groups, or groups of groups. It is expandable in that it allows for inclusion of additional factors such as behavioral, genetic, social, and cultural features. Our results suggest that a rapid transition from a hierarchical society of great apes to an egalitarian society of hunter-gatherers (often referred to as “egalitarian revolution”) could indeed follow an increase in human cognitive abilities. The establishment of stable group-wide egalitarian alliances creates conditions promoting the origin of cultural norms favoring the group interests over those of individuals.
format Text
id pubmed-2547893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25478932008-10-01 Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution Gavrilets, Sergey Duenez-Guzman, Edgar A. Vose, Michael D. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Arguably the most influential force in human history is the formation of social coalitions and alliances (i.e., long-lasting coalitions) and their impact on individual power. Understanding the dynamics of alliance formation and its consequences for biological, social, and cultural evolution is a formidable theoretical challenge. In most great ape species, coalitions occur at individual and group levels and among both kin and non-kin. Nonetheless, ape societies remain essentially hierarchical, and coalitions rarely weaken social inequality. In contrast, human hunter-gatherers show a remarkable tendency to egalitarianism, and human coalitions and alliances occur not only among individuals and groups, but also among groups of groups. These observations suggest that the evolutionary dynamics of human coalitions can only be understood in the context of social networks and cognitive evolution. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we develop a stochastic model describing the emergence of networks of allies resulting from within-group competition for status or mates between individuals utilizing dyadic information. The model shows that alliances often emerge in a phase transition-like fashion if the group size, awareness, aggressiveness, and persuasiveness of individuals are large and the decay rate of individual affinities is small. With cultural inheritance of social networks, a single leveling alliance including all group members can emerge in several generations. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We propose a simple and flexible theoretical approach for studying the dynamics of alliance emergence applicable where game-theoretic methods are not practical. Our approach is both scalable and expandable. It is scalable in that it can be generalized to larger groups, or groups of groups. It is expandable in that it allows for inclusion of additional factors such as behavioral, genetic, social, and cultural features. Our results suggest that a rapid transition from a hierarchical society of great apes to an egalitarian society of hunter-gatherers (often referred to as “egalitarian revolution”) could indeed follow an increase in human cognitive abilities. The establishment of stable group-wide egalitarian alliances creates conditions promoting the origin of cultural norms favoring the group interests over those of individuals. Public Library of Science 2008-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2547893/ /pubmed/18827928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003293 Text en Gavrilets et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gavrilets, Sergey
Duenez-Guzman, Edgar A.
Vose, Michael D.
Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution
title Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution
title_full Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution
title_fullStr Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution
title_short Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution
title_sort dynamics of alliance formation and the egalitarian revolution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18827928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003293
work_keys_str_mv AT gavriletssergey dynamicsofallianceformationandtheegalitarianrevolution
AT duenezguzmanedgara dynamicsofallianceformationandtheegalitarianrevolution
AT vosemichaeld dynamicsofallianceformationandtheegalitarianrevolution