Cargando…

Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care

BACKGROUND: Several studies in wealthy countries suggest that utilization of GP and hospital services, after adjusting for health care need, is equitable or pro-poor, whereas specialist care tends to favour the better off. Horizontal equity in these studies has not been evaluated appropriately, sinc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Regidor, Enrique, Martínez, David, Calle, María E, Astasio, Paloma, Ortega, Paloma, Domínguez, Vicente
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2551602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18789164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-183
_version_ 1782159443977306112
author Regidor, Enrique
Martínez, David
Calle, María E
Astasio, Paloma
Ortega, Paloma
Domínguez, Vicente
author_facet Regidor, Enrique
Martínez, David
Calle, María E
Astasio, Paloma
Ortega, Paloma
Domínguez, Vicente
author_sort Regidor, Enrique
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several studies in wealthy countries suggest that utilization of GP and hospital services, after adjusting for health care need, is equitable or pro-poor, whereas specialist care tends to favour the better off. Horizontal equity in these studies has not been evaluated appropriately, since the use of healthcare services is analysed without distinguishing between public and private services. The purpose of this study is to estimate the relation between socioeconomic position and health services use to determine whether the findings are compatible with the attainment of horizontal equity: equal use of public healthcare services for equal need. METHODS: Data from a sample of 18,837 Spanish subjects were analysed to calculate the percentage of use of public and private general practitioner (GP), specialist and hospital care according to three indicators of socioeconomic position: educational level, social class and income. The percentage ratio was used to estimate the magnitude of the relation between each measure of socioeconomic position and the use of each health service. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex and number of chronic diseases, a gradient was observed in the magnitude of the percentage ratio for public GP visits and hospitalisation: persons in the lowest socioeconomic position were 61–88% more likely to visit public GPs and 39–57% more likely to use public hospitalisation than those in the highest socioeconomic position. In general, the percentage ratio did not show significant socioeconomic differences in the use of public sector specialists. The magnitude of the percentage ratio in the use of the three private services also showed a socioeconomic gradient, but in exactly the opposite direction of the gradient observed in the public services. CONCLUSION: These findings show inequity in GP visits and hospitalisations, favouring the lower socioeconomic groups, and equity in the use of the specialist physician. These inequities could represent an overuse of public healthcare services or could be due to the fact that persons in high socioeconomic positions choose to use private health services.
format Text
id pubmed-2551602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25516022008-09-24 Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care Regidor, Enrique Martínez, David Calle, María E Astasio, Paloma Ortega, Paloma Domínguez, Vicente BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Several studies in wealthy countries suggest that utilization of GP and hospital services, after adjusting for health care need, is equitable or pro-poor, whereas specialist care tends to favour the better off. Horizontal equity in these studies has not been evaluated appropriately, since the use of healthcare services is analysed without distinguishing between public and private services. The purpose of this study is to estimate the relation between socioeconomic position and health services use to determine whether the findings are compatible with the attainment of horizontal equity: equal use of public healthcare services for equal need. METHODS: Data from a sample of 18,837 Spanish subjects were analysed to calculate the percentage of use of public and private general practitioner (GP), specialist and hospital care according to three indicators of socioeconomic position: educational level, social class and income. The percentage ratio was used to estimate the magnitude of the relation between each measure of socioeconomic position and the use of each health service. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex and number of chronic diseases, a gradient was observed in the magnitude of the percentage ratio for public GP visits and hospitalisation: persons in the lowest socioeconomic position were 61–88% more likely to visit public GPs and 39–57% more likely to use public hospitalisation than those in the highest socioeconomic position. In general, the percentage ratio did not show significant socioeconomic differences in the use of public sector specialists. The magnitude of the percentage ratio in the use of the three private services also showed a socioeconomic gradient, but in exactly the opposite direction of the gradient observed in the public services. CONCLUSION: These findings show inequity in GP visits and hospitalisations, favouring the lower socioeconomic groups, and equity in the use of the specialist physician. These inequities could represent an overuse of public healthcare services or could be due to the fact that persons in high socioeconomic positions choose to use private health services. BioMed Central 2008-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2551602/ /pubmed/18789164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-183 Text en Copyright © 2008 Regidor et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Regidor, Enrique
Martínez, David
Calle, María E
Astasio, Paloma
Ortega, Paloma
Domínguez, Vicente
Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care
title Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care
title_full Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care
title_fullStr Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care
title_short Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care
title_sort socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2551602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18789164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-183
work_keys_str_mv AT regidorenrique socioeconomicpatternsintheuseofpublicandprivatehealthservicesandequityinhealthcare
AT martinezdavid socioeconomicpatternsintheuseofpublicandprivatehealthservicesandequityinhealthcare
AT callemariae socioeconomicpatternsintheuseofpublicandprivatehealthservicesandequityinhealthcare
AT astasiopaloma socioeconomicpatternsintheuseofpublicandprivatehealthservicesandequityinhealthcare
AT ortegapaloma socioeconomicpatternsintheuseofpublicandprivatehealthservicesandequityinhealthcare
AT dominguezvicente socioeconomicpatternsintheuseofpublicandprivatehealthservicesandequityinhealthcare