Cargando…

Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods

AIMS: Optimal exercise programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unknown. We aimed to: (i) investigate variations in optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays from rest to exercise, assessed by both echocardiography and an automated intracardiac electrogr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valzania, Cinzia, Eriksson, Maria J., Boriani, Giuseppe, Gadler, Fredrik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2552406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18753213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eun216
_version_ 1782159469938999296
author Valzania, Cinzia
Eriksson, Maria J.
Boriani, Giuseppe
Gadler, Fredrik
author_facet Valzania, Cinzia
Eriksson, Maria J.
Boriani, Giuseppe
Gadler, Fredrik
author_sort Valzania, Cinzia
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Optimal exercise programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unknown. We aimed to: (i) investigate variations in optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays from rest to exercise, assessed by both echocardiography and an automated intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) method; (ii) evaluate the acute haemodynamic impact of CRT optimization performed during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four heart failure patients, previously implanted with a CRT defibrillator, underwent AV and VV delay optimization, by echocardiography and IEGM methods, both at rest and during supine bicycle exercise. Rest-to-exercise variations in optimal VV delay were observed in 58% of patients. Conversely, optimal AV delay did not change during exercise compared with rest. Substantial agreement of AV and VV delays was observed between both the optimization methods. Exercise optimization of VV delay by either method improved intraventricular dyssynchrony and increased aortic velocity time integral compared with the resting setting (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients implanted with a CRT device, optimal VV delay varied considerably from rest to exercise, while AV delay did not change. Re-assessment of the optimal pacing configuration during supine exercise, by echocardiography as well as IEGM methods, yielded an additional haemodynamic benefit to that provided by resting optimization.
format Text
id pubmed-2552406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25524062009-02-25 Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods Valzania, Cinzia Eriksson, Maria J. Boriani, Giuseppe Gadler, Fredrik Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Optimal exercise programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unknown. We aimed to: (i) investigate variations in optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays from rest to exercise, assessed by both echocardiography and an automated intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) method; (ii) evaluate the acute haemodynamic impact of CRT optimization performed during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four heart failure patients, previously implanted with a CRT defibrillator, underwent AV and VV delay optimization, by echocardiography and IEGM methods, both at rest and during supine bicycle exercise. Rest-to-exercise variations in optimal VV delay were observed in 58% of patients. Conversely, optimal AV delay did not change during exercise compared with rest. Substantial agreement of AV and VV delays was observed between both the optimization methods. Exercise optimization of VV delay by either method improved intraventricular dyssynchrony and increased aortic velocity time integral compared with the resting setting (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients implanted with a CRT device, optimal VV delay varied considerably from rest to exercise, while AV delay did not change. Re-assessment of the optimal pacing configuration during supine exercise, by echocardiography as well as IEGM methods, yielded an additional haemodynamic benefit to that provided by resting optimization. Oxford University Press 2008-10 2008-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2552406/ /pubmed/18753213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eun216 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Valzania, Cinzia
Eriksson, Maria J.
Boriani, Giuseppe
Gadler, Fredrik
Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods
title Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods
title_full Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods
title_fullStr Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods
title_short Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods
title_sort cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2552406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18753213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eun216
work_keys_str_mv AT valzaniacinzia cardiacresynchronizationtherapyduringrestandexercisecomparisonoftwooptimizationmethods
AT erikssonmariaj cardiacresynchronizationtherapyduringrestandexercisecomparisonoftwooptimizationmethods
AT borianigiuseppe cardiacresynchronizationtherapyduringrestandexercisecomparisonoftwooptimizationmethods
AT gadlerfredrik cardiacresynchronizationtherapyduringrestandexercisecomparisonoftwooptimizationmethods