Cargando…
Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods
AIMS: Optimal exercise programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unknown. We aimed to: (i) investigate variations in optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays from rest to exercise, assessed by both echocardiography and an automated intracardiac electrogr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2552406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18753213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eun216 |
_version_ | 1782159469938999296 |
---|---|
author | Valzania, Cinzia Eriksson, Maria J. Boriani, Giuseppe Gadler, Fredrik |
author_facet | Valzania, Cinzia Eriksson, Maria J. Boriani, Giuseppe Gadler, Fredrik |
author_sort | Valzania, Cinzia |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Optimal exercise programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unknown. We aimed to: (i) investigate variations in optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays from rest to exercise, assessed by both echocardiography and an automated intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) method; (ii) evaluate the acute haemodynamic impact of CRT optimization performed during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four heart failure patients, previously implanted with a CRT defibrillator, underwent AV and VV delay optimization, by echocardiography and IEGM methods, both at rest and during supine bicycle exercise. Rest-to-exercise variations in optimal VV delay were observed in 58% of patients. Conversely, optimal AV delay did not change during exercise compared with rest. Substantial agreement of AV and VV delays was observed between both the optimization methods. Exercise optimization of VV delay by either method improved intraventricular dyssynchrony and increased aortic velocity time integral compared with the resting setting (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients implanted with a CRT device, optimal VV delay varied considerably from rest to exercise, while AV delay did not change. Re-assessment of the optimal pacing configuration during supine exercise, by echocardiography as well as IEGM methods, yielded an additional haemodynamic benefit to that provided by resting optimization. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2552406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25524062009-02-25 Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods Valzania, Cinzia Eriksson, Maria J. Boriani, Giuseppe Gadler, Fredrik Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Optimal exercise programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unknown. We aimed to: (i) investigate variations in optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays from rest to exercise, assessed by both echocardiography and an automated intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) method; (ii) evaluate the acute haemodynamic impact of CRT optimization performed during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four heart failure patients, previously implanted with a CRT defibrillator, underwent AV and VV delay optimization, by echocardiography and IEGM methods, both at rest and during supine bicycle exercise. Rest-to-exercise variations in optimal VV delay were observed in 58% of patients. Conversely, optimal AV delay did not change during exercise compared with rest. Substantial agreement of AV and VV delays was observed between both the optimization methods. Exercise optimization of VV delay by either method improved intraventricular dyssynchrony and increased aortic velocity time integral compared with the resting setting (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients implanted with a CRT device, optimal VV delay varied considerably from rest to exercise, while AV delay did not change. Re-assessment of the optimal pacing configuration during supine exercise, by echocardiography as well as IEGM methods, yielded an additional haemodynamic benefit to that provided by resting optimization. Oxford University Press 2008-10 2008-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2552406/ /pubmed/18753213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eun216 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Valzania, Cinzia Eriksson, Maria J. Boriani, Giuseppe Gadler, Fredrik Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods |
title | Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods |
title_full | Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods |
title_fullStr | Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods |
title_short | Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods |
title_sort | cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2552406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18753213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eun216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valzaniacinzia cardiacresynchronizationtherapyduringrestandexercisecomparisonoftwooptimizationmethods AT erikssonmariaj cardiacresynchronizationtherapyduringrestandexercisecomparisonoftwooptimizationmethods AT borianigiuseppe cardiacresynchronizationtherapyduringrestandexercisecomparisonoftwooptimizationmethods AT gadlerfredrik cardiacresynchronizationtherapyduringrestandexercisecomparisonoftwooptimizationmethods |