Cargando…
Missed injuries in trauma patients: A literature review
BACKGROUND: Overlooked injuries and delayed diagnoses are still common problems in the treatment of polytrauma patients. Therefore, ongoing documentation describing the incidence rates of missed injuries, clinically significant missed injuries, contributing factors and outcome is necessary to improv...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18721480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-2-20 |
_version_ | 1782159472318218240 |
---|---|
author | Pfeifer, Roman Pape, Hans-Christoph |
author_facet | Pfeifer, Roman Pape, Hans-Christoph |
author_sort | Pfeifer, Roman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Overlooked injuries and delayed diagnoses are still common problems in the treatment of polytrauma patients. Therefore, ongoing documentation describing the incidence rates of missed injuries, clinically significant missed injuries, contributing factors and outcome is necessary to improve the quality of trauma care. This review summarizes the available literature on missed injuries, focusing on overlooked muscoloskeletal injuries. METHODS: Manuscripts dealing with missed injuries after trauma were reviewed. The following search modules were selected in PubMed: Missed injuries, Delayed diagnoses, Trauma, Musculoskeletal injuires. Three time periods were differentiated: (n = 2, 1980–1990), (n = 6, 1990–2000), and (n = 9, 2000-Present). RESULTS: We found a wide spread distribution of missed injuries and delayed diagnoses incidence rates (1.3% to 39%). Approximately 15 to 22.3% of patients with missed injuries had clinically significant missed injuries. Furthermore, we observed a decrease of missed pelvic and hip injuries within the last decade. CONCLUSION: The lack of standardized studies using comparable definitions for missed injuries and clinically significant missed injuries call for further investigations, which are necessary to produce more reliable data. Furthermore, improvements in diagnostic techniques (e.g. the use of multi-slice CT) may lead to a decreased incidence of missed pelvic injuries. Finally, the standardized tertiary trauma survey is vitally important in the detection of clinically significant missed injuries and should be included in trauma care. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2553050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25530502008-09-25 Missed injuries in trauma patients: A literature review Pfeifer, Roman Pape, Hans-Christoph Patient Saf Surg Review BACKGROUND: Overlooked injuries and delayed diagnoses are still common problems in the treatment of polytrauma patients. Therefore, ongoing documentation describing the incidence rates of missed injuries, clinically significant missed injuries, contributing factors and outcome is necessary to improve the quality of trauma care. This review summarizes the available literature on missed injuries, focusing on overlooked muscoloskeletal injuries. METHODS: Manuscripts dealing with missed injuries after trauma were reviewed. The following search modules were selected in PubMed: Missed injuries, Delayed diagnoses, Trauma, Musculoskeletal injuires. Three time periods were differentiated: (n = 2, 1980–1990), (n = 6, 1990–2000), and (n = 9, 2000-Present). RESULTS: We found a wide spread distribution of missed injuries and delayed diagnoses incidence rates (1.3% to 39%). Approximately 15 to 22.3% of patients with missed injuries had clinically significant missed injuries. Furthermore, we observed a decrease of missed pelvic and hip injuries within the last decade. CONCLUSION: The lack of standardized studies using comparable definitions for missed injuries and clinically significant missed injuries call for further investigations, which are necessary to produce more reliable data. Furthermore, improvements in diagnostic techniques (e.g. the use of multi-slice CT) may lead to a decreased incidence of missed pelvic injuries. Finally, the standardized tertiary trauma survey is vitally important in the detection of clinically significant missed injuries and should be included in trauma care. BioMed Central 2008-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2553050/ /pubmed/18721480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-2-20 Text en Copyright © 2008 Pfeifer and Pape; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Pfeifer, Roman Pape, Hans-Christoph Missed injuries in trauma patients: A literature review |
title | Missed injuries in trauma patients: A literature review |
title_full | Missed injuries in trauma patients: A literature review |
title_fullStr | Missed injuries in trauma patients: A literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Missed injuries in trauma patients: A literature review |
title_short | Missed injuries in trauma patients: A literature review |
title_sort | missed injuries in trauma patients: a literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18721480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-2-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pfeiferroman missedinjuriesintraumapatientsaliteraturereview AT papehanschristoph missedinjuriesintraumapatientsaliteraturereview |