Cargando…

Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in the Attentional Blink

BACKGROUND: The attentional blink (AB) refers to humans' impaired ability to detect the second of two targets (T2) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream of distractors if it appears within 200–600 ms of the first target (T1). Here we examined whether humans' ability to inhibi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dux, Paul E., Marois, René
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18833325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003330
_version_ 1782159488110821376
author Dux, Paul E.
Marois, René
author_facet Dux, Paul E.
Marois, René
author_sort Dux, Paul E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The attentional blink (AB) refers to humans' impaired ability to detect the second of two targets (T2) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream of distractors if it appears within 200–600 ms of the first target (T1). Here we examined whether humans' ability to inhibit distractors in the RSVP stream is a key determinant of individual differences in T1 performance and AB magnitude. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We presented subjects with RSVP streams (93.3 ms/item) of letters containing white distractors, a red T1 and a green T2. Subjects' ability to suppress distractors was assessed by determining the extent to which their second target performance was primed by a preceding distractor that shared the same identity as T2. Individual subjects' magnitude of T2 priming from this distractor was found to be negatively correlated with their T1 accuracy and positively related to their AB magnitude. In particular, subjects with attenuated ABs showed negative priming (i.e., worse T2 performance when the priming distractor appeared in the RSVP stream compared to when it was absent), whereas those with large ABs displayed positive priming (i.e., better T2 performance when the priming distractor appeared in the RSVP stream compared to when it was absent). Thus, a subject's ability to suppress distractors, as assessed by T2 priming magnitude, predicted both their T1 performance and AB magnitude. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results confirm that distractor suppression plays a key role in RSVP target selection and support the hypothesis that the AB results, at least in part, from a failure of distractor inhibition.
format Text
id pubmed-2553194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25531942008-10-03 Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in the Attentional Blink Dux, Paul E. Marois, René PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The attentional blink (AB) refers to humans' impaired ability to detect the second of two targets (T2) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream of distractors if it appears within 200–600 ms of the first target (T1). Here we examined whether humans' ability to inhibit distractors in the RSVP stream is a key determinant of individual differences in T1 performance and AB magnitude. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We presented subjects with RSVP streams (93.3 ms/item) of letters containing white distractors, a red T1 and a green T2. Subjects' ability to suppress distractors was assessed by determining the extent to which their second target performance was primed by a preceding distractor that shared the same identity as T2. Individual subjects' magnitude of T2 priming from this distractor was found to be negatively correlated with their T1 accuracy and positively related to their AB magnitude. In particular, subjects with attenuated ABs showed negative priming (i.e., worse T2 performance when the priming distractor appeared in the RSVP stream compared to when it was absent), whereas those with large ABs displayed positive priming (i.e., better T2 performance when the priming distractor appeared in the RSVP stream compared to when it was absent). Thus, a subject's ability to suppress distractors, as assessed by T2 priming magnitude, predicted both their T1 performance and AB magnitude. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results confirm that distractor suppression plays a key role in RSVP target selection and support the hypothesis that the AB results, at least in part, from a failure of distractor inhibition. Public Library of Science 2008-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2553194/ /pubmed/18833325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003330 Text en Dux et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dux, Paul E.
Marois, René
Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in the Attentional Blink
title Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in the Attentional Blink
title_full Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in the Attentional Blink
title_fullStr Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in the Attentional Blink
title_full_unstemmed Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in the Attentional Blink
title_short Distractor Inhibition Predicts Individual Differences in the Attentional Blink
title_sort distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in the attentional blink
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18833325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003330
work_keys_str_mv AT duxpaule distractorinhibitionpredictsindividualdifferencesintheattentionalblink
AT maroisrene distractorinhibitionpredictsindividualdifferencesintheattentionalblink