Cargando…

Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature Analysis

BACKGROUND: The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves new drugs based on sponsor-submitted clinical trials. The publication status of these trials in the medical literature and factors associated with publication have not been evaluated. We sought to determine the proportion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Kirby, Bacchetti, Peter, Sim, Ida
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18816163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050191
_version_ 1782159535039840256
author Lee, Kirby
Bacchetti, Peter
Sim, Ida
author_facet Lee, Kirby
Bacchetti, Peter
Sim, Ida
author_sort Lee, Kirby
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves new drugs based on sponsor-submitted clinical trials. The publication status of these trials in the medical literature and factors associated with publication have not been evaluated. We sought to determine the proportion of trials submitted to the FDA in support of newly approved drugs that are published in biomedical journals that a typical clinician, consumer, or policy maker living in the US would reasonably search. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a cohort study of trials supporting new drugs approved between 1998 and 2000, as described in FDA medical and statistical review documents and the FDA approved drug label. We determined publication status and time from approval to full publication in the medical literature at 2 and 5 y by searching PubMed and other databases through 01 August 2006. We then evaluated trial characteristics associated with publication. We identified 909 trials supporting 90 approved drugs in the FDA reviews, of which 43% (394/909) were published. Among the subset of trials described in the FDA-approved drug label and classified as “pivotal trials” for our analysis, 76% (257/340) were published. In multivariable logistic regression for all trials 5 y postapproval, likelihood of publication correlated with statistically significant results (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78–5.17); larger sample sizes (OR 1.33 per 2-fold increase in sample size, 95% CI 1.17–1.52); and pivotal status (OR 5.31, 95% CI 3.30–8.55). In multivariable logistic regression for only the pivotal trials 5 y postapproval, likelihood of publication correlated with statistically significant results (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.24–7.06) and larger sample sizes (OR 1.47 per 2-fold increase in sample size, 95% CI 1.15–1.88). Statistically significant results and larger sample sizes were also predictive of publication at 2 y postapproval and in multivariable Cox proportional models for all trials and the subset of pivotal trials. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of all supporting trials for FDA-approved drugs remained unpublished ≥ 5 y after approval. Pivotal trials and trials with statistically significant results and larger sample sizes are more likely to be published. Selective reporting of trial results exists for commonly marketed drugs. Our data provide a baseline for evaluating publication bias as the new FDA Amendments Act comes into force mandating basic results reporting of clinical trials.
format Text
id pubmed-2553819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25538192008-09-27 Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature Analysis Lee, Kirby Bacchetti, Peter Sim, Ida PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves new drugs based on sponsor-submitted clinical trials. The publication status of these trials in the medical literature and factors associated with publication have not been evaluated. We sought to determine the proportion of trials submitted to the FDA in support of newly approved drugs that are published in biomedical journals that a typical clinician, consumer, or policy maker living in the US would reasonably search. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a cohort study of trials supporting new drugs approved between 1998 and 2000, as described in FDA medical and statistical review documents and the FDA approved drug label. We determined publication status and time from approval to full publication in the medical literature at 2 and 5 y by searching PubMed and other databases through 01 August 2006. We then evaluated trial characteristics associated with publication. We identified 909 trials supporting 90 approved drugs in the FDA reviews, of which 43% (394/909) were published. Among the subset of trials described in the FDA-approved drug label and classified as “pivotal trials” for our analysis, 76% (257/340) were published. In multivariable logistic regression for all trials 5 y postapproval, likelihood of publication correlated with statistically significant results (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78–5.17); larger sample sizes (OR 1.33 per 2-fold increase in sample size, 95% CI 1.17–1.52); and pivotal status (OR 5.31, 95% CI 3.30–8.55). In multivariable logistic regression for only the pivotal trials 5 y postapproval, likelihood of publication correlated with statistically significant results (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.24–7.06) and larger sample sizes (OR 1.47 per 2-fold increase in sample size, 95% CI 1.15–1.88). Statistically significant results and larger sample sizes were also predictive of publication at 2 y postapproval and in multivariable Cox proportional models for all trials and the subset of pivotal trials. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of all supporting trials for FDA-approved drugs remained unpublished ≥ 5 y after approval. Pivotal trials and trials with statistically significant results and larger sample sizes are more likely to be published. Selective reporting of trial results exists for commonly marketed drugs. Our data provide a baseline for evaluating publication bias as the new FDA Amendments Act comes into force mandating basic results reporting of clinical trials. Public Library of Science 2008-09 2008-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2553819/ /pubmed/18816163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050191 Text en Copyright: © 2008 Lee et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Kirby
Bacchetti, Peter
Sim, Ida
Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature Analysis
title Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature Analysis
title_full Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature Analysis
title_fullStr Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature Analysis
title_short Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature Analysis
title_sort publication of clinical trials supporting successful new drug applications: a literature analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18816163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050191
work_keys_str_mv AT leekirby publicationofclinicaltrialssupportingsuccessfulnewdrugapplicationsaliteratureanalysis
AT bacchettipeter publicationofclinicaltrialssupportingsuccessfulnewdrugapplicationsaliteratureanalysis
AT simida publicationofclinicaltrialssupportingsuccessfulnewdrugapplicationsaliteratureanalysis