Cargando…
Superior effect of forceful compared with standard traction mobilizations in hip disability?
The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two compiled physiotherapy programs: one including forceful traction mobilizations, the other including traction with unknown force, in patients with hip disability according to ICF (the International Classification of Functioning, Disa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18833335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14038190701395739 |
_version_ | 1782159550121508864 |
---|---|
author | Vaarbakken, Kjartan Ljunggren, Anne Elisabeth |
author_facet | Vaarbakken, Kjartan Ljunggren, Anne Elisabeth |
author_sort | Vaarbakken, Kjartan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two compiled physiotherapy programs: one including forceful traction mobilizations, the other including traction with unknown force, in patients with hip disability according to ICF (the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, 2001; WHO), using a block randomized, controlled trial with two parallel treatment groups in a regular private outpatient physiotherapy practice. In the experimental group (E; n = 10) and control group (C; n = 9), the mean (±SD) age for all participants was 59 ± 12 years. They were recruited from outpatient physiotherapy clinics, had persistent pain located at the hip joint for >8 weeks and hip hypomobility. Both groups received exercise, information and manual traction mobilization. In E, the traction force was progressed to 800 N, whereas in C it was unknown. Major outcome measure was the median total change score ≥20 points or ≥50% of the disease- and joint-specific Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), compiled of Pain, Stiffness, Function and Hip-related quality of life (ranging 0–100). The mean (range) treatments received were 13 (7–16) over 5–12 weeks and 20 (18–24) over 12 weeks for E and C, respectively. The experimental group showed superior clinical post-treatment effect on HOOS (≥20 points), in six of 10 participants compared with none of nine in the control group (p = 0.011). The effect size was 1.1. The results suggest that a compiled physiotherapy program including forceful traction mobilizations are short-term effective in reducing self-rated hip disability in primary healthcare. The long-term effect is to be documented. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2556187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25561872008-10-01 Superior effect of forceful compared with standard traction mobilizations in hip disability? Vaarbakken, Kjartan Ljunggren, Anne Elisabeth Adv Physiother Original Article The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two compiled physiotherapy programs: one including forceful traction mobilizations, the other including traction with unknown force, in patients with hip disability according to ICF (the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, 2001; WHO), using a block randomized, controlled trial with two parallel treatment groups in a regular private outpatient physiotherapy practice. In the experimental group (E; n = 10) and control group (C; n = 9), the mean (±SD) age for all participants was 59 ± 12 years. They were recruited from outpatient physiotherapy clinics, had persistent pain located at the hip joint for >8 weeks and hip hypomobility. Both groups received exercise, information and manual traction mobilization. In E, the traction force was progressed to 800 N, whereas in C it was unknown. Major outcome measure was the median total change score ≥20 points or ≥50% of the disease- and joint-specific Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), compiled of Pain, Stiffness, Function and Hip-related quality of life (ranging 0–100). The mean (range) treatments received were 13 (7–16) over 5–12 weeks and 20 (18–24) over 12 weeks for E and C, respectively. The experimental group showed superior clinical post-treatment effect on HOOS (≥20 points), in six of 10 participants compared with none of nine in the control group (p = 0.011). The effect size was 1.1. The results suggest that a compiled physiotherapy program including forceful traction mobilizations are short-term effective in reducing self-rated hip disability in primary healthcare. The long-term effect is to be documented. Informa Healthcare 2007-09 2007-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2556187/ /pubmed/18833335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14038190701395739 Text en © 2007 Taylor & Francis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vaarbakken, Kjartan Ljunggren, Anne Elisabeth Superior effect of forceful compared with standard traction mobilizations in hip disability? |
title | Superior effect of forceful compared with standard traction mobilizations in hip disability? |
title_full | Superior effect of forceful compared with standard traction mobilizations in hip disability? |
title_fullStr | Superior effect of forceful compared with standard traction mobilizations in hip disability? |
title_full_unstemmed | Superior effect of forceful compared with standard traction mobilizations in hip disability? |
title_short | Superior effect of forceful compared with standard traction mobilizations in hip disability? |
title_sort | superior effect of forceful compared with standard traction mobilizations in hip disability? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18833335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14038190701395739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaarbakkenkjartan superioreffectofforcefulcomparedwithstandardtractionmobilizationsinhipdisability AT ljunggrenanneelisabeth superioreffectofforcefulcomparedwithstandardtractionmobilizationsinhipdisability |