Cargando…
Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement?
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation is an important part of pre-hospital advanced life support that requires training and experience, and should only be performed by specially trained personnel. In Norway, anaesthesiologists serve as Helicopter Emergency Medical Service HEMS physicians. However, lit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18957064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-16-2 |
_version_ | 1782159574454763520 |
---|---|
author | Sollid, Stephen JM Heltne, Jon Kenneth Søreide, Eldar Lossius, Hans Morten |
author_facet | Sollid, Stephen JM Heltne, Jon Kenneth Søreide, Eldar Lossius, Hans Morten |
author_sort | Sollid, Stephen JM |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation is an important part of pre-hospital advanced life support that requires training and experience, and should only be performed by specially trained personnel. In Norway, anaesthesiologists serve as Helicopter Emergency Medical Service HEMS physicians. However, little is known about how they themselves evaluate the quality and safety of pre-hospital advanced airway management. METHOD: Using a semi-structured questionnaire, we interviewed anaesthesiologists working in the three HEMS programs covering Western Norway. We compared answers from specialists and non-specialists as well as full- and part-time HEMS physicians. RESULTS: Of the 17 available respondents, most (88%) felt that their continuous exposure to intubations was not sufficient. Additional training was mainly acquired through other clinical practice and mannequin- or cadaver-based skills training. Of the respondents, 77% and 35% reported having experienced difficult and failed intubations, respectively. Further, 59% reported knowledge of airway management-related deaths in their HEMS program. Significantly more full- than part-time HEMS physicians had experienced these problems. All respondents had airway back-up equipment in their service, but 29% were not familiar with all the equipment. CONCLUSION: The majority of anaesthesiologists working as HEMS physicians view pre-hospital advanced airway management as a high-risk procedure. Relevant airway management competencies for HEMS physicians in Norway seem to be insufficiently trained and maintained. A better-defined level of competence with better training methods and systems seems warranted. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2556637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25566372008-10-01 Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement? Sollid, Stephen JM Heltne, Jon Kenneth Søreide, Eldar Lossius, Hans Morten Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation is an important part of pre-hospital advanced life support that requires training and experience, and should only be performed by specially trained personnel. In Norway, anaesthesiologists serve as Helicopter Emergency Medical Service HEMS physicians. However, little is known about how they themselves evaluate the quality and safety of pre-hospital advanced airway management. METHOD: Using a semi-structured questionnaire, we interviewed anaesthesiologists working in the three HEMS programs covering Western Norway. We compared answers from specialists and non-specialists as well as full- and part-time HEMS physicians. RESULTS: Of the 17 available respondents, most (88%) felt that their continuous exposure to intubations was not sufficient. Additional training was mainly acquired through other clinical practice and mannequin- or cadaver-based skills training. Of the respondents, 77% and 35% reported having experienced difficult and failed intubations, respectively. Further, 59% reported knowledge of airway management-related deaths in their HEMS program. Significantly more full- than part-time HEMS physicians had experienced these problems. All respondents had airway back-up equipment in their service, but 29% were not familiar with all the equipment. CONCLUSION: The majority of anaesthesiologists working as HEMS physicians view pre-hospital advanced airway management as a high-risk procedure. Relevant airway management competencies for HEMS physicians in Norway seem to be insufficiently trained and maintained. A better-defined level of competence with better training methods and systems seems warranted. BioMed Central 2008-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2556637/ /pubmed/18957064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-16-2 Text en Copyright © 2008 Sollid et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sollid, Stephen JM Heltne, Jon Kenneth Søreide, Eldar Lossius, Hans Morten Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement? |
title | Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement? |
title_full | Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement? |
title_fullStr | Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement? |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement? |
title_short | Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement? |
title_sort | pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: is there still room for improvement? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18957064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-16-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sollidstephenjm prehospitaladvancedairwaymanagementbyanaesthesiologistsistherestillroomforimprovement AT heltnejonkenneth prehospitaladvancedairwaymanagementbyanaesthesiologistsistherestillroomforimprovement AT søreideeldar prehospitaladvancedairwaymanagementbyanaesthesiologistsistherestillroomforimprovement AT lossiushansmorten prehospitaladvancedairwaymanagementbyanaesthesiologistsistherestillroomforimprovement |