Cargando…

Clinical review: Therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension in ischaemic stroke

The treatment of patients with large hemispheric ischaemic stroke accompanied by massive space-occupying oedema represents one of the major unsolved problems in neurocritical care medicine. Despite maximum intensive care, the prognosis of these patients is poor, with case fatality rates as high as 8...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jüttler, Eric, Schellinger, Peter D, Aschoff, Alfred, Zweckberger, Klaus, Unterberg, Andreas, Hacke, Werner
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18001491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6087
_version_ 1782159590438207488
author Jüttler, Eric
Schellinger, Peter D
Aschoff, Alfred
Zweckberger, Klaus
Unterberg, Andreas
Hacke, Werner
author_facet Jüttler, Eric
Schellinger, Peter D
Aschoff, Alfred
Zweckberger, Klaus
Unterberg, Andreas
Hacke, Werner
author_sort Jüttler, Eric
collection PubMed
description The treatment of patients with large hemispheric ischaemic stroke accompanied by massive space-occupying oedema represents one of the major unsolved problems in neurocritical care medicine. Despite maximum intensive care, the prognosis of these patients is poor, with case fatality rates as high as 80%. Therefore, the term 'malignant brain infarction' was coined. Because conservative treatment strategies to limit brain tissue shift almost consistently fail, these massive infarctions often are regarded as an untreatable disease. The introduction of decompressive surgery (hemicraniectomy) has completely changed this point of view, suggesting that mortality rates may be reduced to approximately 20%. However, critics have always argued that the reduction in mortality may be outweighed by an accompanying increase in severe disability. Due to the lack of conclusive evidence of efficacy from randomised trials, controversy over the benefit of these treatment strategies remained, leading to large regional differences in the application of this procedure. Meanwhile, data from randomised trials confirm the results of former observational studies, demonstrating that hemicraniectomy not only significantly reduces mortality but also significantly improves clinical outcome without increasing the number of completely dependent patients. Hypothermia is another promising treatment option but still needs evidence of efficacy from randomised controlled trials before it may be recommended for clinical routine use. This review gives the reader an integrated view of the current status of treatment options in massive hemispheric brain infarction, based on the available data of clinical trials, including the most recent data from randomised trials published in 2007.
format Text
id pubmed-2556730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25567302008-10-01 Clinical review: Therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension in ischaemic stroke Jüttler, Eric Schellinger, Peter D Aschoff, Alfred Zweckberger, Klaus Unterberg, Andreas Hacke, Werner Crit Care Review The treatment of patients with large hemispheric ischaemic stroke accompanied by massive space-occupying oedema represents one of the major unsolved problems in neurocritical care medicine. Despite maximum intensive care, the prognosis of these patients is poor, with case fatality rates as high as 80%. Therefore, the term 'malignant brain infarction' was coined. Because conservative treatment strategies to limit brain tissue shift almost consistently fail, these massive infarctions often are regarded as an untreatable disease. The introduction of decompressive surgery (hemicraniectomy) has completely changed this point of view, suggesting that mortality rates may be reduced to approximately 20%. However, critics have always argued that the reduction in mortality may be outweighed by an accompanying increase in severe disability. Due to the lack of conclusive evidence of efficacy from randomised trials, controversy over the benefit of these treatment strategies remained, leading to large regional differences in the application of this procedure. Meanwhile, data from randomised trials confirm the results of former observational studies, demonstrating that hemicraniectomy not only significantly reduces mortality but also significantly improves clinical outcome without increasing the number of completely dependent patients. Hypothermia is another promising treatment option but still needs evidence of efficacy from randomised controlled trials before it may be recommended for clinical routine use. This review gives the reader an integrated view of the current status of treatment options in massive hemispheric brain infarction, based on the available data of clinical trials, including the most recent data from randomised trials published in 2007. BioMed Central 2007 2007-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2556730/ /pubmed/18001491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6087 Text en Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Jüttler, Eric
Schellinger, Peter D
Aschoff, Alfred
Zweckberger, Klaus
Unterberg, Andreas
Hacke, Werner
Clinical review: Therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension in ischaemic stroke
title Clinical review: Therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension in ischaemic stroke
title_full Clinical review: Therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension in ischaemic stroke
title_fullStr Clinical review: Therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension in ischaemic stroke
title_full_unstemmed Clinical review: Therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension in ischaemic stroke
title_short Clinical review: Therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension in ischaemic stroke
title_sort clinical review: therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension in ischaemic stroke
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18001491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6087
work_keys_str_mv AT juttlereric clinicalreviewtherapyforrefractoryintracranialhypertensioninischaemicstroke
AT schellingerpeterd clinicalreviewtherapyforrefractoryintracranialhypertensioninischaemicstroke
AT aschoffalfred clinicalreviewtherapyforrefractoryintracranialhypertensioninischaemicstroke
AT zweckbergerklaus clinicalreviewtherapyforrefractoryintracranialhypertensioninischaemicstroke
AT unterbergandreas clinicalreviewtherapyforrefractoryintracranialhypertensioninischaemicstroke
AT hackewerner clinicalreviewtherapyforrefractoryintracranialhypertensioninischaemicstroke