Cargando…
Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess and classify incidents of electromagnetic interference (EMI) by second-generation and third-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment. METHODS: EMI was assessed with two General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) signals (900 MHz, 2 W, two...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17822524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6115 |
_version_ | 1782159593048113152 |
---|---|
author | van Lieshout, Erik Jan van der Veer, Sabine N Hensbroek, Reinout Korevaar, Johanna C Vroom, Margreeth B Schultz, Marcus J |
author_facet | van Lieshout, Erik Jan van der Veer, Sabine N Hensbroek, Reinout Korevaar, Johanna C Vroom, Margreeth B Schultz, Marcus J |
author_sort | van Lieshout, Erik Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess and classify incidents of electromagnetic interference (EMI) by second-generation and third-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment. METHODS: EMI was assessed with two General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) signals (900 MHz, 2 W, two different time-slot occupations) and one Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) signal (1,947.2 MHz, 0.2 W), corresponding to maximal transmit performance of mobile phones in daily practice, generated under controlled conditions in the proximity of 61 medical devices. Incidents of EMI were classified in accordance with an adjusted critical care event scale. RESULTS: A total of 61 medical devices in 17 categories (27 different manufacturers) were tested and demonstrated 48 incidents in 26 devices (43%); 16 (33%) were classified as hazardous, 20 (42%) as significant and 12 (25%) as light. The GPRS-1 signal induced the most EMI incidents (41%), the GRPS-2 signal induced fewer (25%) and the UMTS signal induced the least (13%; P < 0.001). The median distance between antenna and medical device for EMI incidents was 3 cm (range 0.1 to 500 cm). One hazardous incident occurred beyond 100 cm (in a ventilator with GRPS-1 signal at 300 cm). CONCLUSION: Critical care equipment is vulnerable to EMI by new-generation wireless telecommunication technologies with median distances of about 3 cm. The policy to keep mobile phones '1 meter' from the critical care bedside in combination with easily accessed areas of unrestricted use still seems warranted. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2556741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25567412008-10-01 Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment van Lieshout, Erik Jan van der Veer, Sabine N Hensbroek, Reinout Korevaar, Johanna C Vroom, Margreeth B Schultz, Marcus J Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess and classify incidents of electromagnetic interference (EMI) by second-generation and third-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment. METHODS: EMI was assessed with two General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) signals (900 MHz, 2 W, two different time-slot occupations) and one Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) signal (1,947.2 MHz, 0.2 W), corresponding to maximal transmit performance of mobile phones in daily practice, generated under controlled conditions in the proximity of 61 medical devices. Incidents of EMI were classified in accordance with an adjusted critical care event scale. RESULTS: A total of 61 medical devices in 17 categories (27 different manufacturers) were tested and demonstrated 48 incidents in 26 devices (43%); 16 (33%) were classified as hazardous, 20 (42%) as significant and 12 (25%) as light. The GPRS-1 signal induced the most EMI incidents (41%), the GRPS-2 signal induced fewer (25%) and the UMTS signal induced the least (13%; P < 0.001). The median distance between antenna and medical device for EMI incidents was 3 cm (range 0.1 to 500 cm). One hazardous incident occurred beyond 100 cm (in a ventilator with GRPS-1 signal at 300 cm). CONCLUSION: Critical care equipment is vulnerable to EMI by new-generation wireless telecommunication technologies with median distances of about 3 cm. The policy to keep mobile phones '1 meter' from the critical care bedside in combination with easily accessed areas of unrestricted use still seems warranted. BioMed Central 2007 2007-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2556741/ /pubmed/17822524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6115 Text en Copyright © 2007 van Lieshout et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research van Lieshout, Erik Jan van der Veer, Sabine N Hensbroek, Reinout Korevaar, Johanna C Vroom, Margreeth B Schultz, Marcus J Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment |
title | Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment |
title_full | Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment |
title_fullStr | Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment |
title_full_unstemmed | Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment |
title_short | Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment |
title_sort | interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17822524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanlieshouterikjan interferencebynewgenerationmobilephonesoncriticalcaremedicalequipment AT vanderveersabinen interferencebynewgenerationmobilephonesoncriticalcaremedicalequipment AT hensbroekreinout interferencebynewgenerationmobilephonesoncriticalcaremedicalequipment AT korevaarjohannac interferencebynewgenerationmobilephonesoncriticalcaremedicalequipment AT vroommargreethb interferencebynewgenerationmobilephonesoncriticalcaremedicalequipment AT schultzmarcusj interferencebynewgenerationmobilephonesoncriticalcaremedicalequipment |