Cargando…

Effects of 50- or 60-hertz, 100 microT magnetic field exposure in the DMBA mammary cancer model in Sprague-Dawley rats: possible explanations for different results from two laboratories.

In line with the possible relationship between electric power and breast cancer risk and the underlying melatonin hypothesis, 50-Hz magnetic field (MF) exposure at microtesla flux densities for either 13 or 27 weeks significantly increased the development and growth of mammary tumors in a series of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, L E, Morris, J E, Sasser, L B, Löscher, W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11017883
_version_ 1782159607228006400
author Anderson, L E
Morris, J E
Sasser, L B
Löscher, W
author_facet Anderson, L E
Morris, J E
Sasser, L B
Löscher, W
author_sort Anderson, L E
collection PubMed
description In line with the possible relationship between electric power and breast cancer risk and the underlying melatonin hypothesis, 50-Hz magnetic field (MF) exposure at microtesla flux densities for either 13 or 27 weeks significantly increased the development and growth of mammary tumors in a series of experiments from Löscher's group in Germany. Löscher's group used the 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) model of breast cancer in Sprague-Dawley rats. The finding could not be replicated when a similar experimental protocol was used in a study conducted by Battelle in the United States. In the present paper, investigators from the two groups discuss differences between their studies that might explain the apparent discrepancies between the results. These differences include the use of different substrains of Sprague-Dawley rats (the U.S. rats were more susceptible to DMBA than the European rats), different sources for diet and DMBA, differences in environmental conditions, and differences in MF exposure metrics. Furthermore, the effects of MF exposure reported by Löscher's group, albeit significant, were weak. We also discuss the general problem of replicating such weak effects.
format Text
id pubmed-2556919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25569192008-10-01 Effects of 50- or 60-hertz, 100 microT magnetic field exposure in the DMBA mammary cancer model in Sprague-Dawley rats: possible explanations for different results from two laboratories. Anderson, L E Morris, J E Sasser, L B Löscher, W Environ Health Perspect Research Article In line with the possible relationship between electric power and breast cancer risk and the underlying melatonin hypothesis, 50-Hz magnetic field (MF) exposure at microtesla flux densities for either 13 or 27 weeks significantly increased the development and growth of mammary tumors in a series of experiments from Löscher's group in Germany. Löscher's group used the 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) model of breast cancer in Sprague-Dawley rats. The finding could not be replicated when a similar experimental protocol was used in a study conducted by Battelle in the United States. In the present paper, investigators from the two groups discuss differences between their studies that might explain the apparent discrepancies between the results. These differences include the use of different substrains of Sprague-Dawley rats (the U.S. rats were more susceptible to DMBA than the European rats), different sources for diet and DMBA, differences in environmental conditions, and differences in MF exposure metrics. Furthermore, the effects of MF exposure reported by Löscher's group, albeit significant, were weak. We also discuss the general problem of replicating such weak effects. 2000-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2556919/ /pubmed/11017883 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Anderson, L E
Morris, J E
Sasser, L B
Löscher, W
Effects of 50- or 60-hertz, 100 microT magnetic field exposure in the DMBA mammary cancer model in Sprague-Dawley rats: possible explanations for different results from two laboratories.
title Effects of 50- or 60-hertz, 100 microT magnetic field exposure in the DMBA mammary cancer model in Sprague-Dawley rats: possible explanations for different results from two laboratories.
title_full Effects of 50- or 60-hertz, 100 microT magnetic field exposure in the DMBA mammary cancer model in Sprague-Dawley rats: possible explanations for different results from two laboratories.
title_fullStr Effects of 50- or 60-hertz, 100 microT magnetic field exposure in the DMBA mammary cancer model in Sprague-Dawley rats: possible explanations for different results from two laboratories.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of 50- or 60-hertz, 100 microT magnetic field exposure in the DMBA mammary cancer model in Sprague-Dawley rats: possible explanations for different results from two laboratories.
title_short Effects of 50- or 60-hertz, 100 microT magnetic field exposure in the DMBA mammary cancer model in Sprague-Dawley rats: possible explanations for different results from two laboratories.
title_sort effects of 50- or 60-hertz, 100 microt magnetic field exposure in the dmba mammary cancer model in sprague-dawley rats: possible explanations for different results from two laboratories.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11017883
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonle effectsof50or60hertz100microtmagneticfieldexposureinthedmbamammarycancermodelinspraguedawleyratspossibleexplanationsfordifferentresultsfromtwolaboratories
AT morrisje effectsof50or60hertz100microtmagneticfieldexposureinthedmbamammarycancermodelinspraguedawleyratspossibleexplanationsfordifferentresultsfromtwolaboratories
AT sasserlb effectsof50or60hertz100microtmagneticfieldexposureinthedmbamammarycancermodelinspraguedawleyratspossibleexplanationsfordifferentresultsfromtwolaboratories
AT loscherw effectsof50or60hertz100microtmagneticfieldexposureinthedmbamammarycancermodelinspraguedawleyratspossibleexplanationsfordifferentresultsfromtwolaboratories