Cargando…

An assessment of air toxics in Minnesota.

We used monitoring and modeling to assess the concentrations of air toxics in the state of Minnesota. Model-predicted concentrations for 148 hazardous air pollutants were from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cumulative Exposure Project (1990 data). Monitoring data consisted of samples of vo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pratt, G C, Palmer, K, Wu, C Y, Oliaei, F, Hollerbach, C, Fenske, M J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11017885
_version_ 1782159607695671296
author Pratt, G C
Palmer, K
Wu, C Y
Oliaei, F
Hollerbach, C
Fenske, M J
author_facet Pratt, G C
Palmer, K
Wu, C Y
Oliaei, F
Hollerbach, C
Fenske, M J
author_sort Pratt, G C
collection PubMed
description We used monitoring and modeling to assess the concentrations of air toxics in the state of Minnesota. Model-predicted concentrations for 148 hazardous air pollutants were from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cumulative Exposure Project (1990 data). Monitoring data consisted of samples of volatile organic compounds, carbonyls, and particulate matter [Less than and equal to] 10 microm in aerodynamic diameter collected at 25 sites throughout the state for varying periods of time (up to 8 years; 1991-1998). Ten pollutants exceeded health benchmark values at one or more sites by modeling, monitoring, or both (including acrolein, arsenic, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, carbon tetrachloride, chromium, chloroform, ethylene dibromide, formaldehyde, and nickel). Polycyclic organic matter also exceeded the benzo[a]pyrene health benchmark value assumed to represent this class of pollutants. The highest modeled and monitored concentrations of most pollutants were near the center of the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area; however, many smaller cities throughout the state also had elevated concentrations. Where direct comparisons were possible, monitored values often tended to exceed model estimates. Upper-bound excess lifetime inhalation cancer risks were estimated to range from 2.7 [times] 10(-5) to 140. 9 [times] 10(-5) (modeling) and 4.7 [times] 10(-5) to 11.0 [times] 10(-5) (using a smaller set of monitored carcinogens). Screening noncancer hazard indices summed over all end points ranged from 0.2 to 58.1 (modeling) and 0.6 to 2.0 (with a smaller set of monitored pollutants). For common sets of pollutants, the concentrations, cancer risks, and noncancer hazard indices were comparable between model-based estimates and monitored values. The inhalation cancer risk was apportioned to mobile sources (54%), area sources (22%), point sources (12%), and background (12%). This study provides evidence that air toxics are a public health concern in Minnesota.
format Text
id pubmed-2556921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25569212008-10-01 An assessment of air toxics in Minnesota. Pratt, G C Palmer, K Wu, C Y Oliaei, F Hollerbach, C Fenske, M J Environ Health Perspect Research Article We used monitoring and modeling to assess the concentrations of air toxics in the state of Minnesota. Model-predicted concentrations for 148 hazardous air pollutants were from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cumulative Exposure Project (1990 data). Monitoring data consisted of samples of volatile organic compounds, carbonyls, and particulate matter [Less than and equal to] 10 microm in aerodynamic diameter collected at 25 sites throughout the state for varying periods of time (up to 8 years; 1991-1998). Ten pollutants exceeded health benchmark values at one or more sites by modeling, monitoring, or both (including acrolein, arsenic, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, carbon tetrachloride, chromium, chloroform, ethylene dibromide, formaldehyde, and nickel). Polycyclic organic matter also exceeded the benzo[a]pyrene health benchmark value assumed to represent this class of pollutants. The highest modeled and monitored concentrations of most pollutants were near the center of the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area; however, many smaller cities throughout the state also had elevated concentrations. Where direct comparisons were possible, monitored values often tended to exceed model estimates. Upper-bound excess lifetime inhalation cancer risks were estimated to range from 2.7 [times] 10(-5) to 140. 9 [times] 10(-5) (modeling) and 4.7 [times] 10(-5) to 11.0 [times] 10(-5) (using a smaller set of monitored carcinogens). Screening noncancer hazard indices summed over all end points ranged from 0.2 to 58.1 (modeling) and 0.6 to 2.0 (with a smaller set of monitored pollutants). For common sets of pollutants, the concentrations, cancer risks, and noncancer hazard indices were comparable between model-based estimates and monitored values. The inhalation cancer risk was apportioned to mobile sources (54%), area sources (22%), point sources (12%), and background (12%). This study provides evidence that air toxics are a public health concern in Minnesota. 2000-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2556921/ /pubmed/11017885 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Pratt, G C
Palmer, K
Wu, C Y
Oliaei, F
Hollerbach, C
Fenske, M J
An assessment of air toxics in Minnesota.
title An assessment of air toxics in Minnesota.
title_full An assessment of air toxics in Minnesota.
title_fullStr An assessment of air toxics in Minnesota.
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of air toxics in Minnesota.
title_short An assessment of air toxics in Minnesota.
title_sort assessment of air toxics in minnesota.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11017885
work_keys_str_mv AT prattgc anassessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT palmerk anassessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT wucy anassessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT oliaeif anassessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT hollerbachc anassessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT fenskemj anassessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT prattgc assessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT palmerk assessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT wucy assessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT oliaeif assessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT hollerbachc assessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota
AT fenskemj assessmentofairtoxicsinminnesota