Cargando…

The VEPRO trial: A cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia

BACKGROUND: The aim of this trial was to compare the effectiveness of two generations of progressive lenses for presbyopia. METHODS: A multicenter cross-over randomized controlled trial performed in a primary care setting (5 optical dispensaries) was planned. Two categories of progressive lenses wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Boutron, Isabelle, Touizer, Caroline, Pitrou, Isabelle, Roy, Carine, Ravaud, Philippe
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2008
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18803826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-54

Ejemplares similares

Availability of Results of Trials Studying Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma over the Past 10 Years
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Underrepresentation of Elderly People in Randomised Controlled Trials. The Example of Trials of 4 Widely Prescribed Drugs
por: Konrat, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Commentary: Presbyopia correction with intraocular lenses
por: Singh Dhaliwal, Kunwar Vikram
Publicado: (2018)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Applicability and generalisability of published results of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies evaluating four orthopaedic procedures: methodological systematic review
por: Pibouleau, Leslie, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments
por: Zhu, Yanan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Dissemination of 2014 dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) trial results: a systematic review of scholarly and media attention over 7 months
por: Sharp, Melissa K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Inadequate description of educational interventions in ongoing randomized controlled trials
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Assessment of transparency and selective reporting of interventional trials studying colorectal cancer
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development and Evaluation of a Pedagogical Tool to Improve Understanding of a Quality Checklist: A Randomised Controlled Trial
por: Fourcade, Lola, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Exclusion of patients with concomitant chronic conditions in ongoing randomised controlled trials targeting 10 common chronic conditions and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: a systematic review of registration details
por: Buffel du Vaure, Céline, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Bifocal and Multifocal Contact Lenses for Presbyopia and Myopia Control
por: Remón, Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of three different presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses
por: Serdiuk, Valerii, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impact of sending email reminders of the legal requirement for posting results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cohort embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial
por: Maruani, Annabel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

ASSIST Applicability Scoring of Surgical trials. An Investigator-reported aSsessment Tool
por: Tourabaly, Idriss, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reporting of analyses from randomized controlled trials with multiple arms: a systematic review
por: Baron, Gabriel, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
por: Heim, Amytis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
por: Barnes, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Interpretation of health news items reported with or without spin: protocol for a prospective meta-analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Timing and Completeness of Trial Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and Published in Journals
por: Riveros, Carolina, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials
por: Kapp, Philipp, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting funding source or conflict of interest in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, no evidence of a large impact on general practitioners’ confidence in conclusions, a three-arm randomized controlled trial
por: du Vaure, Céline Buffel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates for Pharmacological Randomized Controlled Trials Enrolling Older Adults Only and Those including Adults: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Seegers, Valérie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses
por: Gibbons, Allister, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Portable device for presbyopia correction with optoelectronic lenses driven by pupil response
por: Mompeán, Juan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnès, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Geographical Representativeness of Published and Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials. The Example of: Tobacco Consumption and HIV Infection
por: Ahmad, Nizar, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses
por: Baudard, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Knee Arthroplasty: Disabilities in Comparison to the General Population and to Hip Arthroplasty Using a French National Longitudinal Survey
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Surgical Curriculum for Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: Resident Experiences and Surgical Outcomes
por: Riaz, Kamran M, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correction to: Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_658k4o7tjbd8jcim7kp3ja54ef