Cargando…

Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany

BACKGROUND: The way patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are treated is partly determined by non-medical factors. There is a solid body of evidence that patient and physician characteristics influence doctors' management decisions. Relatively little is known about the role of structural i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von dem Knesebeck, Olaf, Bönte, Markus, Siegrist, Johannes, Marceau, Lisa, Link, Carol, Arber, Sara, Adams, Ann, McKinlay, John
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2561025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18823556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-198
_version_ 1782159701896593408
author von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
Bönte, Markus
Siegrist, Johannes
Marceau, Lisa
Link, Carol
Arber, Sara
Adams, Ann
McKinlay, John
author_facet von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
Bönte, Markus
Siegrist, Johannes
Marceau, Lisa
Link, Carol
Arber, Sara
Adams, Ann
McKinlay, John
author_sort von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The way patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are treated is partly determined by non-medical factors. There is a solid body of evidence that patient and physician characteristics influence doctors' management decisions. Relatively little is known about the role of structural issues in the decision making process. This study focuses on the question whether doctors' diagnostic and therapeutic decisions are influenced by the health care system in which they take place. This non-medical determinant of medical decision-making was investigated in an international research project in the US, the UK and Germany. METHODS: Videotaped patients within an experimental study design were used. Experienced actors played the role of patients with symptoms of CHD. Several alternative versions were taped featuring the same script with patients of different sex, age and social status. The videotapes were shown to 384 randomly selected primary care physicians in the three countries under study. The sample was stratified on gender and duration of professional experience. Physicians were asked how they would diagnose and manage the patient after watching the video vignette using a questionnaire with standardised and open-ended questions. RESULTS: Results show only small differences in decision making between British and American physicians in essential aspects of care. About 90% of the UK and US doctors identified CHD as one of the possible diagnoses. Further similarities were found in test ordering and lifestyle advice. Some differences between the US and UK were found in the certainty of the diagnoses, prescribed medications and referral behaviour. There are numerous significant differences between Germany and the other two countries. German physicians would ask fewer questions, they would order fewer tests, prescribe fewer medications and give less lifestyle advice. CONCLUSION: Although all physicians in the three countries under study were presented exactly the same patient, some disparities in the diagnostic and patient management decisions were evident. Since other possible influences on doctors treatment decisions are controlled within the experimental design, characteristics of the health care system seem to be a crucial factor within the decision making process.
format Text
id pubmed-2561025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25610252008-10-04 Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany von dem Knesebeck, Olaf Bönte, Markus Siegrist, Johannes Marceau, Lisa Link, Carol Arber, Sara Adams, Ann McKinlay, John BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The way patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are treated is partly determined by non-medical factors. There is a solid body of evidence that patient and physician characteristics influence doctors' management decisions. Relatively little is known about the role of structural issues in the decision making process. This study focuses on the question whether doctors' diagnostic and therapeutic decisions are influenced by the health care system in which they take place. This non-medical determinant of medical decision-making was investigated in an international research project in the US, the UK and Germany. METHODS: Videotaped patients within an experimental study design were used. Experienced actors played the role of patients with symptoms of CHD. Several alternative versions were taped featuring the same script with patients of different sex, age and social status. The videotapes were shown to 384 randomly selected primary care physicians in the three countries under study. The sample was stratified on gender and duration of professional experience. Physicians were asked how they would diagnose and manage the patient after watching the video vignette using a questionnaire with standardised and open-ended questions. RESULTS: Results show only small differences in decision making between British and American physicians in essential aspects of care. About 90% of the UK and US doctors identified CHD as one of the possible diagnoses. Further similarities were found in test ordering and lifestyle advice. Some differences between the US and UK were found in the certainty of the diagnoses, prescribed medications and referral behaviour. There are numerous significant differences between Germany and the other two countries. German physicians would ask fewer questions, they would order fewer tests, prescribe fewer medications and give less lifestyle advice. CONCLUSION: Although all physicians in the three countries under study were presented exactly the same patient, some disparities in the diagnostic and patient management decisions were evident. Since other possible influences on doctors treatment decisions are controlled within the experimental design, characteristics of the health care system seem to be a crucial factor within the decision making process. BioMed Central 2008-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2561025/ /pubmed/18823556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-198 Text en Copyright © 2008 Knesebeck et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
Bönte, Markus
Siegrist, Johannes
Marceau, Lisa
Link, Carol
Arber, Sara
Adams, Ann
McKinlay, John
Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany
title Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany
title_full Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany
title_fullStr Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany
title_full_unstemmed Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany
title_short Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany
title_sort country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the us, the uk and germany
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2561025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18823556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-198
work_keys_str_mv AT vondemknesebeckolaf countrydifferencesinthediagnosisandmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseacomparisonbetweentheustheukandgermany
AT bontemarkus countrydifferencesinthediagnosisandmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseacomparisonbetweentheustheukandgermany
AT siegristjohannes countrydifferencesinthediagnosisandmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseacomparisonbetweentheustheukandgermany
AT marceaulisa countrydifferencesinthediagnosisandmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseacomparisonbetweentheustheukandgermany
AT linkcarol countrydifferencesinthediagnosisandmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseacomparisonbetweentheustheukandgermany
AT arbersara countrydifferencesinthediagnosisandmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseacomparisonbetweentheustheukandgermany
AT adamsann countrydifferencesinthediagnosisandmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseacomparisonbetweentheustheukandgermany
AT mckinlayjohn countrydifferencesinthediagnosisandmanagementofcoronaryheartdiseaseacomparisonbetweentheustheukandgermany