Cargando…

Impact of different leaf velocities and dose rates on the number of monitor units and the dose-volume-histograms using intensity modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique

BACKGROUND: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using sliding window technique utilises a leaf sequencing algorithm, which takes some control system limitations like dose rates (DR) and velocity of the leafs (LV) into account. The effect of altering these limitations on the number of monitor uni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vorwerk, Hilke, Wagner, Daniela, Hess, Clemens F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2561032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18811954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-3-31
_version_ 1782159703547052032
author Vorwerk, Hilke
Wagner, Daniela
Hess, Clemens F
author_facet Vorwerk, Hilke
Wagner, Daniela
Hess, Clemens F
author_sort Vorwerk, Hilke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using sliding window technique utilises a leaf sequencing algorithm, which takes some control system limitations like dose rates (DR) and velocity of the leafs (LV) into account. The effect of altering these limitations on the number of monitor units and radiation dose to the organs at risk (OAR) were analysed. METHODS: IMRT plans for different LVs from 1.0 cm/sec to 10.0 cm/sec and different DRs from 100 MU/min to 600 MU/min for two patients with prostate cancer and two patients with squamous cell cancer of the scalp (SCCscalp) were calculated using the same "optimal fluence map". For each field the number of monitor units, the dose volume histograms and the differences in the "actual fluence maps" of the fields were analysed. RESULTS: With increase of the DR and decrease of the LV the number of monitor units increased and consequentially the radiation dose given to the OAR. In particular the serial OARs of patients with SCCscalp, which are located outside the end position of the leafs and inside the open field, received an additional dose of a higher DR and lower LV is used. CONCLUSION: For best protection of organs at risk, a low DR and high LV should be applied. But the consequence of a low DR is both a long treatment time and also that a LV of higher than 3.0 cm/sec is mechanically not applicable. Our recommendation for an optimisation of the discussed parameters is a leaf velocity of 2.5 cm/sec and a dose rate of 300–400 MU/min (prostate cancer) and 100–200 MU/min (SCCscalp) for best protection of organs at risk, short treatment time and number of monitor units.
format Text
id pubmed-2561032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25610322008-10-07 Impact of different leaf velocities and dose rates on the number of monitor units and the dose-volume-histograms using intensity modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique Vorwerk, Hilke Wagner, Daniela Hess, Clemens F Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using sliding window technique utilises a leaf sequencing algorithm, which takes some control system limitations like dose rates (DR) and velocity of the leafs (LV) into account. The effect of altering these limitations on the number of monitor units and radiation dose to the organs at risk (OAR) were analysed. METHODS: IMRT plans for different LVs from 1.0 cm/sec to 10.0 cm/sec and different DRs from 100 MU/min to 600 MU/min for two patients with prostate cancer and two patients with squamous cell cancer of the scalp (SCCscalp) were calculated using the same "optimal fluence map". For each field the number of monitor units, the dose volume histograms and the differences in the "actual fluence maps" of the fields were analysed. RESULTS: With increase of the DR and decrease of the LV the number of monitor units increased and consequentially the radiation dose given to the OAR. In particular the serial OARs of patients with SCCscalp, which are located outside the end position of the leafs and inside the open field, received an additional dose of a higher DR and lower LV is used. CONCLUSION: For best protection of organs at risk, a low DR and high LV should be applied. But the consequence of a low DR is both a long treatment time and also that a LV of higher than 3.0 cm/sec is mechanically not applicable. Our recommendation for an optimisation of the discussed parameters is a leaf velocity of 2.5 cm/sec and a dose rate of 300–400 MU/min (prostate cancer) and 100–200 MU/min (SCCscalp) for best protection of organs at risk, short treatment time and number of monitor units. BioMed Central 2008-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2561032/ /pubmed/18811954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-3-31 Text en Copyright © 2008 Vorwerk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Vorwerk, Hilke
Wagner, Daniela
Hess, Clemens F
Impact of different leaf velocities and dose rates on the number of monitor units and the dose-volume-histograms using intensity modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique
title Impact of different leaf velocities and dose rates on the number of monitor units and the dose-volume-histograms using intensity modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique
title_full Impact of different leaf velocities and dose rates on the number of monitor units and the dose-volume-histograms using intensity modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique
title_fullStr Impact of different leaf velocities and dose rates on the number of monitor units and the dose-volume-histograms using intensity modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different leaf velocities and dose rates on the number of monitor units and the dose-volume-histograms using intensity modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique
title_short Impact of different leaf velocities and dose rates on the number of monitor units and the dose-volume-histograms using intensity modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique
title_sort impact of different leaf velocities and dose rates on the number of monitor units and the dose-volume-histograms using intensity modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2561032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18811954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-3-31
work_keys_str_mv AT vorwerkhilke impactofdifferentleafvelocitiesanddoseratesonthenumberofmonitorunitsandthedosevolumehistogramsusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithslidingwindowtechnique
AT wagnerdaniela impactofdifferentleafvelocitiesanddoseratesonthenumberofmonitorunitsandthedosevolumehistogramsusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithslidingwindowtechnique
AT hessclemensf impactofdifferentleafvelocitiesanddoseratesonthenumberofmonitorunitsandthedosevolumehistogramsusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithslidingwindowtechnique