Cargando…

Comparison of CT and PET-CT based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND: To compare computed tomography (CT) with co-registered positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) as the basis for delineating gross tumor volume (GTV) in unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). METHODS: Fourteen patients with unresectable LAPC had both...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topkan, Erkan, Yavuz, Ali A, Aydin, Mehmet, Onal, Cem, Yapar, Fuat, Yavuz, Melek N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2562364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18808725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-41
_version_ 1782159740424421376
author Topkan, Erkan
Yavuz, Ali A
Aydin, Mehmet
Onal, Cem
Yapar, Fuat
Yavuz, Melek N
author_facet Topkan, Erkan
Yavuz, Ali A
Aydin, Mehmet
Onal, Cem
Yapar, Fuat
Yavuz, Melek N
author_sort Topkan, Erkan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare computed tomography (CT) with co-registered positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) as the basis for delineating gross tumor volume (GTV) in unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). METHODS: Fourteen patients with unresectable LAPC had both CT and PET images acquired. For each patient, two three-dimensional conformal plans were made using the CT and PET-CT fusion data sets. We analyzed differences in treatment plans and doses of radiation to primary tumors and critical organs. RESULTS: Changes in GTV delineation were necessary in 5 patients based on PET-CT information. In these patients, the average increase in GTV was 29.7%, due to the incorporation of additional lymph node metastases and extension of the primary tumor beyond that defined by CT. For all patients, the GTV(CT )versus GTV(PET-CT )was 92.5 ± 32.3 cm(3 )versus 104.5 ± 32.6 cm(3 )(p = 0.009). Toxicity analysis revealed no clinically significant differences between two plans with regard to doses to critical organs. CONCLUSION: Co-registration of PET and CT information in unresectable LAPC may improve the delineation of GTV and theoretically reduce the likelihood of geographic misses.
format Text
id pubmed-2562364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25623642008-10-07 Comparison of CT and PET-CT based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma Topkan, Erkan Yavuz, Ali A Aydin, Mehmet Onal, Cem Yapar, Fuat Yavuz, Melek N J Exp Clin Cancer Res Research BACKGROUND: To compare computed tomography (CT) with co-registered positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) as the basis for delineating gross tumor volume (GTV) in unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). METHODS: Fourteen patients with unresectable LAPC had both CT and PET images acquired. For each patient, two three-dimensional conformal plans were made using the CT and PET-CT fusion data sets. We analyzed differences in treatment plans and doses of radiation to primary tumors and critical organs. RESULTS: Changes in GTV delineation were necessary in 5 patients based on PET-CT information. In these patients, the average increase in GTV was 29.7%, due to the incorporation of additional lymph node metastases and extension of the primary tumor beyond that defined by CT. For all patients, the GTV(CT )versus GTV(PET-CT )was 92.5 ± 32.3 cm(3 )versus 104.5 ± 32.6 cm(3 )(p = 0.009). Toxicity analysis revealed no clinically significant differences between two plans with regard to doses to critical organs. CONCLUSION: Co-registration of PET and CT information in unresectable LAPC may improve the delineation of GTV and theoretically reduce the likelihood of geographic misses. BioMed Central 2008-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2562364/ /pubmed/18808725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-41 Text en Copyright © 2008 Topkan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Topkan, Erkan
Yavuz, Ali A
Aydin, Mehmet
Onal, Cem
Yapar, Fuat
Yavuz, Melek N
Comparison of CT and PET-CT based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
title Comparison of CT and PET-CT based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
title_full Comparison of CT and PET-CT based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparison of CT and PET-CT based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CT and PET-CT based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
title_short Comparison of CT and PET-CT based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
title_sort comparison of ct and pet-ct based planning of radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2562364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18808725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-41
work_keys_str_mv AT topkanerkan comparisonofctandpetctbasedplanningofradiationtherapyinlocallyadvancedpancreaticcarcinoma
AT yavuzalia comparisonofctandpetctbasedplanningofradiationtherapyinlocallyadvancedpancreaticcarcinoma
AT aydinmehmet comparisonofctandpetctbasedplanningofradiationtherapyinlocallyadvancedpancreaticcarcinoma
AT onalcem comparisonofctandpetctbasedplanningofradiationtherapyinlocallyadvancedpancreaticcarcinoma
AT yaparfuat comparisonofctandpetctbasedplanningofradiationtherapyinlocallyadvancedpancreaticcarcinoma
AT yavuzmelekn comparisonofctandpetctbasedplanningofradiationtherapyinlocallyadvancedpancreaticcarcinoma