Cargando…

How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model

BACKGROUND: In order to promote consumer-oriented informed medical decision-making regarding screening mammography, we created a decision model to predict the age dependence of the cancer detection rate, the recall rate and the secondary performance measures (positive predictive values, total interv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keen, John D, Keen, James E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2563001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18803871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-40
_version_ 1782159781911330816
author Keen, John D
Keen, James E
author_facet Keen, John D
Keen, James E
author_sort Keen, John D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to promote consumer-oriented informed medical decision-making regarding screening mammography, we created a decision model to predict the age dependence of the cancer detection rate, the recall rate and the secondary performance measures (positive predictive values, total intervention rate, and positive biopsy fraction) for a baseline mammogram. METHODS: We constructed a decision tree to model the possible outcomes of a baseline screening mammogram in women ages 35 to 65. We compared the single baseline screening mammogram decision with the no screening alternative. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results national cancer database as the primary input to estimate cancer prevalence. For other probabilities, the model used population-based estimates for screening mammography accuracy and diagnostic mammography outcomes specific to baseline exams. We varied radiologist performance for screening accuracy. RESULTS: The cancer detection rate increases from 1.9/1000 at age 40 to 7.2/1000 at age 50 to 15.1/1000 at age 60. The recall rate remains relatively stable at 142–157/1000, which varies from 73–236/1000 at age 50 depending on radiologist performance. The positive predictive value of a screening mammogram increases from 1.3% at age 40 to 9.8% at age 60, while the positive predictive value of a diagnostic mammogram varies from 2.9% at age 40 to 19.2% at age 60. The model predicts the total intervention rate = 0.013*AGE(2 )- 0.67*AGE + 40, or 34/1000 at age 40 to 47/1000 at age 60. Therefore, the positive biopsy (intervention) fraction varies from 6% at age 40 to 32% at age 60. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer prevalence, the cancer detection rate, and all secondary screening mammography performance measures increase substantially with age.
format Text
id pubmed-2563001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25630012008-10-08 How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model Keen, John D Keen, James E BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: In order to promote consumer-oriented informed medical decision-making regarding screening mammography, we created a decision model to predict the age dependence of the cancer detection rate, the recall rate and the secondary performance measures (positive predictive values, total intervention rate, and positive biopsy fraction) for a baseline mammogram. METHODS: We constructed a decision tree to model the possible outcomes of a baseline screening mammogram in women ages 35 to 65. We compared the single baseline screening mammogram decision with the no screening alternative. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results national cancer database as the primary input to estimate cancer prevalence. For other probabilities, the model used population-based estimates for screening mammography accuracy and diagnostic mammography outcomes specific to baseline exams. We varied radiologist performance for screening accuracy. RESULTS: The cancer detection rate increases from 1.9/1000 at age 40 to 7.2/1000 at age 50 to 15.1/1000 at age 60. The recall rate remains relatively stable at 142–157/1000, which varies from 73–236/1000 at age 50 depending on radiologist performance. The positive predictive value of a screening mammogram increases from 1.3% at age 40 to 9.8% at age 60, while the positive predictive value of a diagnostic mammogram varies from 2.9% at age 40 to 19.2% at age 60. The model predicts the total intervention rate = 0.013*AGE(2 )- 0.67*AGE + 40, or 34/1000 at age 40 to 47/1000 at age 60. Therefore, the positive biopsy (intervention) fraction varies from 6% at age 40 to 32% at age 60. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer prevalence, the cancer detection rate, and all secondary screening mammography performance measures increase substantially with age. BioMed Central 2008-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2563001/ /pubmed/18803871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-40 Text en Copyright © 2008 Keen and Keen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Keen, John D
Keen, James E
How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model
title How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model
title_full How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model
title_fullStr How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model
title_full_unstemmed How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model
title_short How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model
title_sort how does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? a decision model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2563001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18803871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-40
work_keys_str_mv AT keenjohnd howdoesageaffectbaselinescreeningmammographyperformancemeasuresadecisionmodel
AT keenjamese howdoesageaffectbaselinescreeningmammographyperformancemeasuresadecisionmodel