Cargando…

Relation between nodule size and (18)F-FDG-PET SUV for malignant and benign pulmonary nodules.

The most common semiquantitative method of evaluation of pulmonary lesions using (18)F-FDG PET is FDG standardized uptake value (SUV). An SUV cutoff of 2.5 or greater has been used to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules. The goal of our study was to investigate the correlation between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khalaf, Majid, Abdel-Nabi, Hani, Baker, John, Shao, Yiping, Lamonica, Dominick, Gona, Jayakumari
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2563015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18808716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-1-13
_version_ 1782159785242656768
author Khalaf, Majid
Abdel-Nabi, Hani
Baker, John
Shao, Yiping
Lamonica, Dominick
Gona, Jayakumari
author_facet Khalaf, Majid
Abdel-Nabi, Hani
Baker, John
Shao, Yiping
Lamonica, Dominick
Gona, Jayakumari
author_sort Khalaf, Majid
collection PubMed
description The most common semiquantitative method of evaluation of pulmonary lesions using (18)F-FDG PET is FDG standardized uptake value (SUV). An SUV cutoff of 2.5 or greater has been used to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules. The goal of our study was to investigate the correlation between the size of pulmonary nodules and the SUV for benign as well as for malignant nodules. Retrospectively, 173 patients were selected from 420 referrals for evaluation of pulmonary lesions. All patients selected had a positive CT and PET scans and histopathology biopsy. A linear regression equation was fitted to a scatter plot of size and SUV(max )for malignant and benign nodules together. A dot diagram was created to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy using an SUV(max )cutoff of 2.5. The linear regression equations and (R(2))s as well as the trendlines for malignant and benign nodules demonstrated that the slope of the regression line is greater for malignant than for benign nodules. Twenty-eight nodules of group one (≤ 1.0 cm) are plotted in a dot diagram using an SUV(max )cutoff of 2.5. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated to be 85%, 36% and 54% respectively. Similarly, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for an SUV(max )cutoff of 2.5 and found to be 91%, 47%, and 79% respectively for group 2 (1.1–2.0 cm); 94%, 23%, and 76%, respectively for group 3 (2.1–3.0 cm); and 100%, 17%, and 82%,, respectively for group 4 (> 3.0 cm). The previous results of the dot diagram indicating that the sensitivity and the accuracy of the test using an SUV(max )cutoff of 2.5 are increased with an increase in the diameter of pulmonary nodules. The slope of the regression line is greater for malignant than for benign nodules. Although, the SUV(max )cutoff of 2.5 is a useful tool in the evaluation of large pulmonary nodules (> 1.0 cm), it has no or minimal value in the evaluation of small pulmonary nodules (≤ 1.0 cm).
format Text
id pubmed-2563015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25630152008-10-08 Relation between nodule size and (18)F-FDG-PET SUV for malignant and benign pulmonary nodules. Khalaf, Majid Abdel-Nabi, Hani Baker, John Shao, Yiping Lamonica, Dominick Gona, Jayakumari J Hematol Oncol Research The most common semiquantitative method of evaluation of pulmonary lesions using (18)F-FDG PET is FDG standardized uptake value (SUV). An SUV cutoff of 2.5 or greater has been used to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules. The goal of our study was to investigate the correlation between the size of pulmonary nodules and the SUV for benign as well as for malignant nodules. Retrospectively, 173 patients were selected from 420 referrals for evaluation of pulmonary lesions. All patients selected had a positive CT and PET scans and histopathology biopsy. A linear regression equation was fitted to a scatter plot of size and SUV(max )for malignant and benign nodules together. A dot diagram was created to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy using an SUV(max )cutoff of 2.5. The linear regression equations and (R(2))s as well as the trendlines for malignant and benign nodules demonstrated that the slope of the regression line is greater for malignant than for benign nodules. Twenty-eight nodules of group one (≤ 1.0 cm) are plotted in a dot diagram using an SUV(max )cutoff of 2.5. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated to be 85%, 36% and 54% respectively. Similarly, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for an SUV(max )cutoff of 2.5 and found to be 91%, 47%, and 79% respectively for group 2 (1.1–2.0 cm); 94%, 23%, and 76%, respectively for group 3 (2.1–3.0 cm); and 100%, 17%, and 82%,, respectively for group 4 (> 3.0 cm). The previous results of the dot diagram indicating that the sensitivity and the accuracy of the test using an SUV(max )cutoff of 2.5 are increased with an increase in the diameter of pulmonary nodules. The slope of the regression line is greater for malignant than for benign nodules. Although, the SUV(max )cutoff of 2.5 is a useful tool in the evaluation of large pulmonary nodules (> 1.0 cm), it has no or minimal value in the evaluation of small pulmonary nodules (≤ 1.0 cm). BioMed Central 2008-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2563015/ /pubmed/18808716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-1-13 Text en Copyright © 2008 Khalaf et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Khalaf, Majid
Abdel-Nabi, Hani
Baker, John
Shao, Yiping
Lamonica, Dominick
Gona, Jayakumari
Relation between nodule size and (18)F-FDG-PET SUV for malignant and benign pulmonary nodules.
title Relation between nodule size and (18)F-FDG-PET SUV for malignant and benign pulmonary nodules.
title_full Relation between nodule size and (18)F-FDG-PET SUV for malignant and benign pulmonary nodules.
title_fullStr Relation between nodule size and (18)F-FDG-PET SUV for malignant and benign pulmonary nodules.
title_full_unstemmed Relation between nodule size and (18)F-FDG-PET SUV for malignant and benign pulmonary nodules.
title_short Relation between nodule size and (18)F-FDG-PET SUV for malignant and benign pulmonary nodules.
title_sort relation between nodule size and (18)f-fdg-pet suv for malignant and benign pulmonary nodules.
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2563015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18808716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-1-13
work_keys_str_mv AT khalafmajid relationbetweennodulesizeand18ffdgpetsuvformalignantandbenignpulmonarynodules
AT abdelnabihani relationbetweennodulesizeand18ffdgpetsuvformalignantandbenignpulmonarynodules
AT bakerjohn relationbetweennodulesizeand18ffdgpetsuvformalignantandbenignpulmonarynodules
AT shaoyiping relationbetweennodulesizeand18ffdgpetsuvformalignantandbenignpulmonarynodules
AT lamonicadominick relationbetweennodulesizeand18ffdgpetsuvformalignantandbenignpulmonarynodules
AT gonajayakumari relationbetweennodulesizeand18ffdgpetsuvformalignantandbenignpulmonarynodules