Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate, CRx-102, in hand osteoarthritis
OBJECTIVE: The novel synergistic drug candidate CRx-102 comprises dipyridamole and low dose prednisolone and is in clinical development for the treatment of immunoinflammatory diseases. The purpose of this clinical study was to examine the efficacy and safety of CRx-102 in patients with hand osteoar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2564788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17962237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.074401 |
_version_ | 1782159798196764672 |
---|---|
author | Kvien, T K Fjeld, E Slatkowsky-Christensen, B Nichols, M Zhang, Y Prøven, A Mikkelsen, K Palm, Ø Borisy, A A Lessem, J |
author_facet | Kvien, T K Fjeld, E Slatkowsky-Christensen, B Nichols, M Zhang, Y Prøven, A Mikkelsen, K Palm, Ø Borisy, A A Lessem, J |
author_sort | Kvien, T K |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The novel synergistic drug candidate CRx-102 comprises dipyridamole and low dose prednisolone and is in clinical development for the treatment of immunoinflammatory diseases. The purpose of this clinical study was to examine the efficacy and safety of CRx-102 in patients with hand osteoarthritis (HOA). METHODS: The study was conducted as a blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial at four centres in Norway. Eligibility criteria included being of age 30–70 years, at least one swollen and tender joint, a Kellgren–Lawrence (K–L) score of 2 or higher on radiographs, and a score of at least 30 mm pain on the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) visual analogue pain scale (VAS). The primary endpoint was a reduction in pain from baseline to day 42 on the AUSCAN pain subscale. Two-sided p values for the differences in least squares (LS) means adjusted for baseline are presented. RESULTS: The mean age of the 83 patients with HOA was 60 years and 93% were females. CRx-102 was statistically superior to placebo at 42 days for changes in AUSCAN pain (LS mean −14.2 vs −4.0) and for clinically relevant secondary endpoints (joint pain VAS (−18.6 vs −6.3), patient global VAS (−15.9 vs −4.2)) in the intention to treat population. The most frequently reported adverse event during the study was headache (52% in CRx-102 vs 15% in the placebo group). CONCLUSIONS: The novel synergistic drug candidate CRx-102 demonstrated efficacy by statistically reducing pain compared to placebo in HOA and was generally well tolerated. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2564788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25647882008-10-24 Efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate, CRx-102, in hand osteoarthritis Kvien, T K Fjeld, E Slatkowsky-Christensen, B Nichols, M Zhang, Y Prøven, A Mikkelsen, K Palm, Ø Borisy, A A Lessem, J Ann Rheum Dis Extended Reports OBJECTIVE: The novel synergistic drug candidate CRx-102 comprises dipyridamole and low dose prednisolone and is in clinical development for the treatment of immunoinflammatory diseases. The purpose of this clinical study was to examine the efficacy and safety of CRx-102 in patients with hand osteoarthritis (HOA). METHODS: The study was conducted as a blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial at four centres in Norway. Eligibility criteria included being of age 30–70 years, at least one swollen and tender joint, a Kellgren–Lawrence (K–L) score of 2 or higher on radiographs, and a score of at least 30 mm pain on the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) visual analogue pain scale (VAS). The primary endpoint was a reduction in pain from baseline to day 42 on the AUSCAN pain subscale. Two-sided p values for the differences in least squares (LS) means adjusted for baseline are presented. RESULTS: The mean age of the 83 patients with HOA was 60 years and 93% were females. CRx-102 was statistically superior to placebo at 42 days for changes in AUSCAN pain (LS mean −14.2 vs −4.0) and for clinically relevant secondary endpoints (joint pain VAS (−18.6 vs −6.3), patient global VAS (−15.9 vs −4.2)) in the intention to treat population. The most frequently reported adverse event during the study was headache (52% in CRx-102 vs 15% in the placebo group). CONCLUSIONS: The novel synergistic drug candidate CRx-102 demonstrated efficacy by statistically reducing pain compared to placebo in HOA and was generally well tolerated. BMJ Publishing Group 2008-07 2007-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2564788/ /pubmed/17962237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.074401 Text en © Kvien et al 2008 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Extended Reports Kvien, T K Fjeld, E Slatkowsky-Christensen, B Nichols, M Zhang, Y Prøven, A Mikkelsen, K Palm, Ø Borisy, A A Lessem, J Efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate, CRx-102, in hand osteoarthritis |
title | Efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate, CRx-102, in hand osteoarthritis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate, CRx-102, in hand osteoarthritis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate, CRx-102, in hand osteoarthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate, CRx-102, in hand osteoarthritis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate, CRx-102, in hand osteoarthritis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate, crx-102, in hand osteoarthritis |
topic | Extended Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2564788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17962237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.074401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kvientk efficacyandsafetyofanovelsynergisticdrugcandidatecrx102inhandosteoarthritis AT fjelde efficacyandsafetyofanovelsynergisticdrugcandidatecrx102inhandosteoarthritis AT slatkowskychristensenb efficacyandsafetyofanovelsynergisticdrugcandidatecrx102inhandosteoarthritis AT nicholsm efficacyandsafetyofanovelsynergisticdrugcandidatecrx102inhandosteoarthritis AT zhangy efficacyandsafetyofanovelsynergisticdrugcandidatecrx102inhandosteoarthritis AT prøvena efficacyandsafetyofanovelsynergisticdrugcandidatecrx102inhandosteoarthritis AT mikkelsenk efficacyandsafetyofanovelsynergisticdrugcandidatecrx102inhandosteoarthritis AT palmø efficacyandsafetyofanovelsynergisticdrugcandidatecrx102inhandosteoarthritis AT borisyaa efficacyandsafetyofanovelsynergisticdrugcandidatecrx102inhandosteoarthritis AT lessemj efficacyandsafetyofanovelsynergisticdrugcandidatecrx102inhandosteoarthritis |