Cargando…

General Validity of Levelt's Propositions Reveals Common Computational Mechanisms for Visual Rivalry

The mechanisms underlying conscious visual perception are often studied with either binocular rivalry or perceptual rivalry stimuli. Despite existing research into both types of rivalry, it remains unclear to what extent their underlying mechanisms involve common computational rules. Computational m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klink, P. Christiaan, van Ee, Raymond, van Wezel, Richard J. A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2565840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18941522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003473
_version_ 1782159940293492736
author Klink, P. Christiaan
van Ee, Raymond
van Wezel, Richard J. A.
author_facet Klink, P. Christiaan
van Ee, Raymond
van Wezel, Richard J. A.
author_sort Klink, P. Christiaan
collection PubMed
description The mechanisms underlying conscious visual perception are often studied with either binocular rivalry or perceptual rivalry stimuli. Despite existing research into both types of rivalry, it remains unclear to what extent their underlying mechanisms involve common computational rules. Computational models of binocular rivalry mechanisms are generally tested against Levelt's four propositions, describing the psychophysical relation between stimulus strength and alternation dynamics in binocular rivalry. Here we use a bistable rotating structure-from-motion sphere, a generally studied form of perceptual rivalry, to demonstrate that Levelt's propositions also apply to the alternation dynamics of perceptual rivalry. Importantly, these findings suggest that bistability in structure-from-motion results from active cross-inhibition between neural populations with computational principles similar to those present in binocular rivalry. Thus, although the neural input to the computational mechanism of rivalry may stem from different cortical neurons and different cognitive levels the computational principles just prior to the production of visual awareness appear to be common to the two types of rivalry.
format Text
id pubmed-2565840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25658402008-10-22 General Validity of Levelt's Propositions Reveals Common Computational Mechanisms for Visual Rivalry Klink, P. Christiaan van Ee, Raymond van Wezel, Richard J. A. PLoS One Research Article The mechanisms underlying conscious visual perception are often studied with either binocular rivalry or perceptual rivalry stimuli. Despite existing research into both types of rivalry, it remains unclear to what extent their underlying mechanisms involve common computational rules. Computational models of binocular rivalry mechanisms are generally tested against Levelt's four propositions, describing the psychophysical relation between stimulus strength and alternation dynamics in binocular rivalry. Here we use a bistable rotating structure-from-motion sphere, a generally studied form of perceptual rivalry, to demonstrate that Levelt's propositions also apply to the alternation dynamics of perceptual rivalry. Importantly, these findings suggest that bistability in structure-from-motion results from active cross-inhibition between neural populations with computational principles similar to those present in binocular rivalry. Thus, although the neural input to the computational mechanism of rivalry may stem from different cortical neurons and different cognitive levels the computational principles just prior to the production of visual awareness appear to be common to the two types of rivalry. Public Library of Science 2008-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2565840/ /pubmed/18941522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003473 Text en Klink et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Klink, P. Christiaan
van Ee, Raymond
van Wezel, Richard J. A.
General Validity of Levelt's Propositions Reveals Common Computational Mechanisms for Visual Rivalry
title General Validity of Levelt's Propositions Reveals Common Computational Mechanisms for Visual Rivalry
title_full General Validity of Levelt's Propositions Reveals Common Computational Mechanisms for Visual Rivalry
title_fullStr General Validity of Levelt's Propositions Reveals Common Computational Mechanisms for Visual Rivalry
title_full_unstemmed General Validity of Levelt's Propositions Reveals Common Computational Mechanisms for Visual Rivalry
title_short General Validity of Levelt's Propositions Reveals Common Computational Mechanisms for Visual Rivalry
title_sort general validity of levelt's propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2565840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18941522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003473
work_keys_str_mv AT klinkpchristiaan generalvalidityofleveltspropositionsrevealscommoncomputationalmechanismsforvisualrivalry
AT vaneeraymond generalvalidityofleveltspropositionsrevealscommoncomputationalmechanismsforvisualrivalry
AT vanwezelrichardja generalvalidityofleveltspropositionsrevealscommoncomputationalmechanismsforvisualrivalry