Cargando…

Careful with understudied phyla: The case of chaetognath

BACKGROUND: A recent study by Barthélémy et al. described a set of ribosomal protein (RP) genes extracted from a collection of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of the chaetognath (arrow worm) Spadella cephaloptera. Three main conclusions were drawn in this paper. First, the authors stated that RP gene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marlétaz, Ferdinand, Le Parco, Yannick
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2566580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18798978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-251
_version_ 1782159952342679552
author Marlétaz, Ferdinand
Le Parco, Yannick
author_facet Marlétaz, Ferdinand
Le Parco, Yannick
author_sort Marlétaz, Ferdinand
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A recent study by Barthélémy et al. described a set of ribosomal protein (RP) genes extracted from a collection of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of the chaetognath (arrow worm) Spadella cephaloptera. Three main conclusions were drawn in this paper. First, the authors stated that RP genes present paralogous copies, which have arisen through allopolyploidization. Second, they reported two alternate nucleotide stretches conserved within the 5' untranslated regions (UTR) of multiple ribosomal cDNAs and they suggested that these motifs are involved in the differential transcriptional regulation of paralogous RP genes. Third, they claimed that the phylogenetic position of chaetognaths could not be accurately inferred from a RP dataset because of the persistence of two problems: a long branch attraction (LBA) artefact and a compositional bias. RESULTS: We reconsider here the results described in Barthélémy et al. and question the evidence on which they are based. We find that their evidence for paralogous copies relies on faulty PCR experiments since they attempted to amplify DNA fragments absent from the genomic template. Our PCR experiments proved that the conserved motifs in 5'UTRs that they targeted in their amplifications are added post-transcriptionally by a trans-splicing mechanism. Then, we showed that the lack of phylogenetic resolution observed by these authors is due to limited taxon sampling and not to LBA or to compositional bias. A ribosomal protein dataset thus fully supports the position of chaetognaths as sister group of all other protostomes. This reinterpretation demonstrates that the statements of Barthélémy et al. should be taken with caution because they rely on inaccurate evidence. CONCLUSION: The genomic study of an unconventional model organism is a meaningful approach to understand the evolution of animals. However, the previous study came to incorrect conclusions on the basis of experiments that omitted validation procedures.
format Text
id pubmed-2566580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25665802008-10-11 Careful with understudied phyla: The case of chaetognath Marlétaz, Ferdinand Le Parco, Yannick BMC Evol Biol Correspondence BACKGROUND: A recent study by Barthélémy et al. described a set of ribosomal protein (RP) genes extracted from a collection of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of the chaetognath (arrow worm) Spadella cephaloptera. Three main conclusions were drawn in this paper. First, the authors stated that RP genes present paralogous copies, which have arisen through allopolyploidization. Second, they reported two alternate nucleotide stretches conserved within the 5' untranslated regions (UTR) of multiple ribosomal cDNAs and they suggested that these motifs are involved in the differential transcriptional regulation of paralogous RP genes. Third, they claimed that the phylogenetic position of chaetognaths could not be accurately inferred from a RP dataset because of the persistence of two problems: a long branch attraction (LBA) artefact and a compositional bias. RESULTS: We reconsider here the results described in Barthélémy et al. and question the evidence on which they are based. We find that their evidence for paralogous copies relies on faulty PCR experiments since they attempted to amplify DNA fragments absent from the genomic template. Our PCR experiments proved that the conserved motifs in 5'UTRs that they targeted in their amplifications are added post-transcriptionally by a trans-splicing mechanism. Then, we showed that the lack of phylogenetic resolution observed by these authors is due to limited taxon sampling and not to LBA or to compositional bias. A ribosomal protein dataset thus fully supports the position of chaetognaths as sister group of all other protostomes. This reinterpretation demonstrates that the statements of Barthélémy et al. should be taken with caution because they rely on inaccurate evidence. CONCLUSION: The genomic study of an unconventional model organism is a meaningful approach to understand the evolution of animals. However, the previous study came to incorrect conclusions on the basis of experiments that omitted validation procedures. BioMed Central 2008-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2566580/ /pubmed/18798978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-251 Text en Copyright ©2008 Marlétaz and Le Parco; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Marlétaz, Ferdinand
Le Parco, Yannick
Careful with understudied phyla: The case of chaetognath
title Careful with understudied phyla: The case of chaetognath
title_full Careful with understudied phyla: The case of chaetognath
title_fullStr Careful with understudied phyla: The case of chaetognath
title_full_unstemmed Careful with understudied phyla: The case of chaetognath
title_short Careful with understudied phyla: The case of chaetognath
title_sort careful with understudied phyla: the case of chaetognath
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2566580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18798978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-251
work_keys_str_mv AT marletazferdinand carefulwithunderstudiedphylathecaseofchaetognath
AT leparcoyannick carefulwithunderstudiedphylathecaseofchaetognath