Cargando…

Negative exploration for pyloric stenosis – Is it preventable?

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS), although traditionally clinical, is now increasingly dependent on radiological corroboration. The rate of negative exploration in IHPS has been reported as 4%. The purpose of our study was to look at elements of supportive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullassery, Dhanya, Mallappa, Sreelakshmi, Shariff, Raheel, Craigie, Ross J, Losty, Paul D, Kenny, Simon E, Pilling, David, Baillie, Colin T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2566972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18816390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-8-37
_version_ 1782159973438980096
author Mullassery, Dhanya
Mallappa, Sreelakshmi
Shariff, Raheel
Craigie, Ross J
Losty, Paul D
Kenny, Simon E
Pilling, David
Baillie, Colin T
author_facet Mullassery, Dhanya
Mallappa, Sreelakshmi
Shariff, Raheel
Craigie, Ross J
Losty, Paul D
Kenny, Simon E
Pilling, David
Baillie, Colin T
author_sort Mullassery, Dhanya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS), although traditionally clinical, is now increasingly dependent on radiological corroboration. The rate of negative exploration in IHPS has been reported as 4%. The purpose of our study was to look at elements of supportive clinical evidence leading to positive diagnosis, and to review these with respect to misdiagnosed cases undergoing negative exploration. METHODS: All infants undergoing surgical exploration for IHPS between January 2000 and December 2004 were retrospectively analysed with regard to clinical symptoms, examination findings, investigations and operative findings. RESULTS: During the study period, 343 explorations were performed with a presumptive diagnosis of IHPS. Of these, 205 infants (60%) had a positive test feed, 269 (78%) had a positive ultrasound scan and 175 (55%) were alkalotic (pH ≥7.45 and/or base excess ≥2.5). The positive predictive value for an ultrasound (US) diagnosis was 99.1% for canal length ≥14 mm, and 98.7% for muscle thickness ≥4 mm. Four infants (1.1%) underwent a negative surgical exploration; Ultrasound was positive in 3, and negative in 1(who underwent surgery on the basis of a positive upper GI contrast). One US reported as positive had a muscle thickness <4 mm. Two false positive US were performed at peripheral hospitals. One infant had a false positive test feed following a positive ultrasound diagnosis. Two infants had negative test feeds. CONCLUSION: A 1% rate of negative exploration in IHPS compares favourably with other studies. However potential causes of error were identified in all 4 cases. Confident diagnosis comprises a combination of positive test feed and an 'in house US' in an alkalotic infant. UGI contrast study should not be used in isolation to diagnose IHPS. If the test feed is negative, strict diagnostic measurements should be observed on US and the pyloric 'tumour' palpated on table under anaesthetic before exploration.
format Text
id pubmed-2566972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25669722008-10-14 Negative exploration for pyloric stenosis – Is it preventable? Mullassery, Dhanya Mallappa, Sreelakshmi Shariff, Raheel Craigie, Ross J Losty, Paul D Kenny, Simon E Pilling, David Baillie, Colin T BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS), although traditionally clinical, is now increasingly dependent on radiological corroboration. The rate of negative exploration in IHPS has been reported as 4%. The purpose of our study was to look at elements of supportive clinical evidence leading to positive diagnosis, and to review these with respect to misdiagnosed cases undergoing negative exploration. METHODS: All infants undergoing surgical exploration for IHPS between January 2000 and December 2004 were retrospectively analysed with regard to clinical symptoms, examination findings, investigations and operative findings. RESULTS: During the study period, 343 explorations were performed with a presumptive diagnosis of IHPS. Of these, 205 infants (60%) had a positive test feed, 269 (78%) had a positive ultrasound scan and 175 (55%) were alkalotic (pH ≥7.45 and/or base excess ≥2.5). The positive predictive value for an ultrasound (US) diagnosis was 99.1% for canal length ≥14 mm, and 98.7% for muscle thickness ≥4 mm. Four infants (1.1%) underwent a negative surgical exploration; Ultrasound was positive in 3, and negative in 1(who underwent surgery on the basis of a positive upper GI contrast). One US reported as positive had a muscle thickness <4 mm. Two false positive US were performed at peripheral hospitals. One infant had a false positive test feed following a positive ultrasound diagnosis. Two infants had negative test feeds. CONCLUSION: A 1% rate of negative exploration in IHPS compares favourably with other studies. However potential causes of error were identified in all 4 cases. Confident diagnosis comprises a combination of positive test feed and an 'in house US' in an alkalotic infant. UGI contrast study should not be used in isolation to diagnose IHPS. If the test feed is negative, strict diagnostic measurements should be observed on US and the pyloric 'tumour' palpated on table under anaesthetic before exploration. BioMed Central 2008-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2566972/ /pubmed/18816390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-8-37 Text en Copyright © 2008 Mullassery et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mullassery, Dhanya
Mallappa, Sreelakshmi
Shariff, Raheel
Craigie, Ross J
Losty, Paul D
Kenny, Simon E
Pilling, David
Baillie, Colin T
Negative exploration for pyloric stenosis – Is it preventable?
title Negative exploration for pyloric stenosis – Is it preventable?
title_full Negative exploration for pyloric stenosis – Is it preventable?
title_fullStr Negative exploration for pyloric stenosis – Is it preventable?
title_full_unstemmed Negative exploration for pyloric stenosis – Is it preventable?
title_short Negative exploration for pyloric stenosis – Is it preventable?
title_sort negative exploration for pyloric stenosis – is it preventable?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2566972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18816390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-8-37
work_keys_str_mv AT mullasserydhanya negativeexplorationforpyloricstenosisisitpreventable
AT mallappasreelakshmi negativeexplorationforpyloricstenosisisitpreventable
AT shariffraheel negativeexplorationforpyloricstenosisisitpreventable
AT craigierossj negativeexplorationforpyloricstenosisisitpreventable
AT lostypauld negativeexplorationforpyloricstenosisisitpreventable
AT kennysimone negativeexplorationforpyloricstenosisisitpreventable
AT pillingdavid negativeexplorationforpyloricstenosisisitpreventable
AT bailliecolint negativeexplorationforpyloricstenosisisitpreventable