Cargando…
Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes
Does peer review fulfill its declared objective of identifying the best science and the best scientists? In order to answer this question we analyzed the Long-Term Fellowship and the Young Investigator programmes of the European Molecular Biology Organization. Both programmes aim to identify and sup...
Autores principales: | Bornmann, Lutz, Wallon, Gerlind, Ledin, Anna |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18941530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003480 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?: An Empirical Investigation Using the Example of the Austrian Science
Fund
por: Mutz, Rüdiger, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”?
por: Wainer, Jacques, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact
por: Leydesdorff, Loet, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Physicians’ attitudes towards the media and peer-review selection of the ‘best cancer doctor’: comparison of two different selection methods
por: Shin, Dong Wook, et al.
Publicado: (2018)