Cargando…

Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review aimed to examine if an association exists between dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) intake and breast cancer risk. A systematic search was conducted in Medline and Embase and identified 14 relevant studies up to May 2008. Adjusted relative risk estimates com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulholland, H G, Murray, L J, Cardwell, C R, Cantwell, M M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18728653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604618
_version_ 1782159989466464256
author Mulholland, H G
Murray, L J
Cardwell, C R
Cantwell, M M
author_facet Mulholland, H G
Murray, L J
Cardwell, C R
Cantwell, M M
author_sort Mulholland, H G
collection PubMed
description This systematic review aimed to examine if an association exists between dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) intake and breast cancer risk. A systematic search was conducted in Medline and Embase and identified 14 relevant studies up to May 2008. Adjusted relative risk estimates comparing breast cancer risk for the highest versus the lowest category of GI/GL intake were extracted from relevant studies and combined in meta-analyses using a random-effects model. Combined estimates from six cohort studies show non-significant increased breast cancer risks for premenopausal women (relative risk (RR) 1.14, 95% CI 0.95–1.38) and postmenopausal women (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99–1.25) consuming the highest versus the lowest category of GI intake. Evidence of heterogeneity hindered analyses of GL and premenopausal risk, although most studies did not observe any significant association. Pooled cohort study results indicated no association between postmenopausal risk and GL intake (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94–1.12). Our findings do not provide strong support of an association between dietary GI and GL and breast cancer risk.
format Text
id pubmed-2567079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25670792009-10-07 Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mulholland, H G Murray, L J Cardwell, C R Cantwell, M M Br J Cancer Epidemiology This systematic review aimed to examine if an association exists between dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) intake and breast cancer risk. A systematic search was conducted in Medline and Embase and identified 14 relevant studies up to May 2008. Adjusted relative risk estimates comparing breast cancer risk for the highest versus the lowest category of GI/GL intake were extracted from relevant studies and combined in meta-analyses using a random-effects model. Combined estimates from six cohort studies show non-significant increased breast cancer risks for premenopausal women (relative risk (RR) 1.14, 95% CI 0.95–1.38) and postmenopausal women (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99–1.25) consuming the highest versus the lowest category of GI intake. Evidence of heterogeneity hindered analyses of GL and premenopausal risk, although most studies did not observe any significant association. Pooled cohort study results indicated no association between postmenopausal risk and GL intake (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94–1.12). Our findings do not provide strong support of an association between dietary GI and GL and breast cancer risk. Nature Publishing Group 2008-10-07 2008-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2567079/ /pubmed/18728653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604618 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Mulholland, H G
Murray, L J
Cardwell, C R
Cantwell, M M
Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18728653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604618
work_keys_str_mv AT mulhollandhg dietaryglycaemicindexglycaemicloadandbreastcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT murraylj dietaryglycaemicindexglycaemicloadandbreastcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cardwellcr dietaryglycaemicindexglycaemicloadandbreastcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cantwellmm dietaryglycaemicindexglycaemicloadandbreastcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis