Cargando…

Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design

Research methods for biomarker evaluation lag behind those for evaluating therapeutic treatments. Although a phased approach to development of biomarkers exists and guidelines are available for reporting study results, a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for study design has not been deli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pepe, Margaret S., Feng, Ziding, Janes, Holly, Bossuyt, Patrick M., Potter, John D.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18840817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn326
_version_ 1782160011868241920
author Pepe, Margaret S.
Feng, Ziding
Janes, Holly
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Potter, John D.
author_facet Pepe, Margaret S.
Feng, Ziding
Janes, Holly
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Potter, John D.
author_sort Pepe, Margaret S.
collection PubMed
description Research methods for biomarker evaluation lag behind those for evaluating therapeutic treatments. Although a phased approach to development of biomarkers exists and guidelines are available for reporting study results, a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for study design has not been delineated. We describe a nested case–control study design that involves prospective collection of specimens before outcome ascertainment from a study cohort that is relevant to the clinical application. The biomarker is assayed in a blinded fashion on specimens from randomly selected case patients and control subjects in the study cohort. We separately describe aspects of the design that relate to the clinical context, biomarker performance criteria, the biomarker test, and study size. The design can be applied to studies of biomarkers intended for use in disease diagnosis, screening, or prognosis. Common biases that pervade the biomarker research literature would be eliminated if these rigorous standards were followed.
format Text
id pubmed-2567415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25674152009-02-25 Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design Pepe, Margaret S. Feng, Ziding Janes, Holly Bossuyt, Patrick M. Potter, John D. J Natl Cancer Inst Commentary Research methods for biomarker evaluation lag behind those for evaluating therapeutic treatments. Although a phased approach to development of biomarkers exists and guidelines are available for reporting study results, a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for study design has not been delineated. We describe a nested case–control study design that involves prospective collection of specimens before outcome ascertainment from a study cohort that is relevant to the clinical application. The biomarker is assayed in a blinded fashion on specimens from randomly selected case patients and control subjects in the study cohort. We separately describe aspects of the design that relate to the clinical context, biomarker performance criteria, the biomarker test, and study size. The design can be applied to studies of biomarkers intended for use in disease diagnosis, screening, or prognosis. Common biases that pervade the biomarker research literature would be eliminated if these rigorous standards were followed. Oxford University Press 2008-10-15 2008-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2567415/ /pubmed/18840817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn326 Text en © 2008 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Pepe, Margaret S.
Feng, Ziding
Janes, Holly
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Potter, John D.
Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design
title Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design
title_full Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design
title_fullStr Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design
title_full_unstemmed Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design
title_short Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design
title_sort pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18840817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn326
work_keys_str_mv AT pepemargarets pivotalevaluationoftheaccuracyofabiomarkerusedforclassificationorpredictionstandardsforstudydesign
AT fengziding pivotalevaluationoftheaccuracyofabiomarkerusedforclassificationorpredictionstandardsforstudydesign
AT janesholly pivotalevaluationoftheaccuracyofabiomarkerusedforclassificationorpredictionstandardsforstudydesign
AT bossuytpatrickm pivotalevaluationoftheaccuracyofabiomarkerusedforclassificationorpredictionstandardsforstudydesign
AT potterjohnd pivotalevaluationoftheaccuracyofabiomarkerusedforclassificationorpredictionstandardsforstudydesign