Cargando…
Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design
Research methods for biomarker evaluation lag behind those for evaluating therapeutic treatments. Although a phased approach to development of biomarkers exists and guidelines are available for reporting study results, a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for study design has not been deli...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18840817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn326 |
_version_ | 1782160011868241920 |
---|---|
author | Pepe, Margaret S. Feng, Ziding Janes, Holly Bossuyt, Patrick M. Potter, John D. |
author_facet | Pepe, Margaret S. Feng, Ziding Janes, Holly Bossuyt, Patrick M. Potter, John D. |
author_sort | Pepe, Margaret S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research methods for biomarker evaluation lag behind those for evaluating therapeutic treatments. Although a phased approach to development of biomarkers exists and guidelines are available for reporting study results, a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for study design has not been delineated. We describe a nested case–control study design that involves prospective collection of specimens before outcome ascertainment from a study cohort that is relevant to the clinical application. The biomarker is assayed in a blinded fashion on specimens from randomly selected case patients and control subjects in the study cohort. We separately describe aspects of the design that relate to the clinical context, biomarker performance criteria, the biomarker test, and study size. The design can be applied to studies of biomarkers intended for use in disease diagnosis, screening, or prognosis. Common biases that pervade the biomarker research literature would be eliminated if these rigorous standards were followed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2567415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25674152009-02-25 Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design Pepe, Margaret S. Feng, Ziding Janes, Holly Bossuyt, Patrick M. Potter, John D. J Natl Cancer Inst Commentary Research methods for biomarker evaluation lag behind those for evaluating therapeutic treatments. Although a phased approach to development of biomarkers exists and guidelines are available for reporting study results, a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for study design has not been delineated. We describe a nested case–control study design that involves prospective collection of specimens before outcome ascertainment from a study cohort that is relevant to the clinical application. The biomarker is assayed in a blinded fashion on specimens from randomly selected case patients and control subjects in the study cohort. We separately describe aspects of the design that relate to the clinical context, biomarker performance criteria, the biomarker test, and study size. The design can be applied to studies of biomarkers intended for use in disease diagnosis, screening, or prognosis. Common biases that pervade the biomarker research literature would be eliminated if these rigorous standards were followed. Oxford University Press 2008-10-15 2008-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2567415/ /pubmed/18840817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn326 Text en © 2008 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Pepe, Margaret S. Feng, Ziding Janes, Holly Bossuyt, Patrick M. Potter, John D. Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design |
title | Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design |
title_full | Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design |
title_fullStr | Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design |
title_full_unstemmed | Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design |
title_short | Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design |
title_sort | pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18840817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn326 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pepemargarets pivotalevaluationoftheaccuracyofabiomarkerusedforclassificationorpredictionstandardsforstudydesign AT fengziding pivotalevaluationoftheaccuracyofabiomarkerusedforclassificationorpredictionstandardsforstudydesign AT janesholly pivotalevaluationoftheaccuracyofabiomarkerusedforclassificationorpredictionstandardsforstudydesign AT bossuytpatrickm pivotalevaluationoftheaccuracyofabiomarkerusedforclassificationorpredictionstandardsforstudydesign AT potterjohnd pivotalevaluationoftheaccuracyofabiomarkerusedforclassificationorpredictionstandardsforstudydesign |