Cargando…

Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project

BACKGROUND: While the Osteoporosis Canada 2002 Canadian guidelines provided evidence based strategies in preventing, diagnosing, and managing this condition, publication and distribution of guidelines have not, in and of themselves, been shown to alter physicians clinical approaches. We hypothesize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ioannidis, George, Thabane, Lehana, Gafni, Amiram, Hodsman, Anthony, Kvern, Brent, Johnstone, Dan, Plumley, Nathalie, Salach, Lena, Jiwa, Famida, Adachi, Jonathan D, Papaioannou, Alexandra
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18828906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-130
_version_ 1782160020504313856
author Ioannidis, George
Thabane, Lehana
Gafni, Amiram
Hodsman, Anthony
Kvern, Brent
Johnstone, Dan
Plumley, Nathalie
Salach, Lena
Jiwa, Famida
Adachi, Jonathan D
Papaioannou, Alexandra
author_facet Ioannidis, George
Thabane, Lehana
Gafni, Amiram
Hodsman, Anthony
Kvern, Brent
Johnstone, Dan
Plumley, Nathalie
Salach, Lena
Jiwa, Famida
Adachi, Jonathan D
Papaioannou, Alexandra
author_sort Ioannidis, George
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the Osteoporosis Canada 2002 Canadian guidelines provided evidence based strategies in preventing, diagnosing, and managing this condition, publication and distribution of guidelines have not, in and of themselves, been shown to alter physicians clinical approaches. We hypothesize that primary care physicians enrolled in the Quality Circle project would change their patient management of osteoporosis in terms of awareness of osteoporosis risk factors and bone mineral density testing in accordance with the guidelines. METHODS: The project consisted of five Quality Circle phases that included: 1) Training & Baseline Data Collection, 2) First Educational Intervention & First Follow-Up Data Collection 3) First Strategy Implementation Session, 4) Final Educational Intervention & Final Follow-up Data Collection, and 5) Final Strategy Implementation Session. A total of 340 circle members formed 34 quality circles and participated in the study. The generalized estimating equations approach was used to model physician awareness of risk factors for osteoporosis and appropriate utilization of bone mineral density testing pre and post educational intervention (first year of the study). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: After the 1(st )year of the study, physicians' certainty of their patients' risk factor status increased. Certainty varied from an OR of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.8) for prior vertebral fracture status to 6.3 (95% CI: 2.3, 17.9) for prior hip fracture status. Furthermore, bone mineral density testing increased in high risk as compared with low risk patients (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.7). CONCLUSION: Quality Circle methodology was successful in increasing both physicians' awareness of osteoporosis risk factors and appropriate bone mineral density testing in accordance with the 2002 Canadian guidelines.
format Text
id pubmed-2567974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25679742008-10-16 Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project Ioannidis, George Thabane, Lehana Gafni, Amiram Hodsman, Anthony Kvern, Brent Johnstone, Dan Plumley, Nathalie Salach, Lena Jiwa, Famida Adachi, Jonathan D Papaioannou, Alexandra BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: While the Osteoporosis Canada 2002 Canadian guidelines provided evidence based strategies in preventing, diagnosing, and managing this condition, publication and distribution of guidelines have not, in and of themselves, been shown to alter physicians clinical approaches. We hypothesize that primary care physicians enrolled in the Quality Circle project would change their patient management of osteoporosis in terms of awareness of osteoporosis risk factors and bone mineral density testing in accordance with the guidelines. METHODS: The project consisted of five Quality Circle phases that included: 1) Training & Baseline Data Collection, 2) First Educational Intervention & First Follow-Up Data Collection 3) First Strategy Implementation Session, 4) Final Educational Intervention & Final Follow-up Data Collection, and 5) Final Strategy Implementation Session. A total of 340 circle members formed 34 quality circles and participated in the study. The generalized estimating equations approach was used to model physician awareness of risk factors for osteoporosis and appropriate utilization of bone mineral density testing pre and post educational intervention (first year of the study). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: After the 1(st )year of the study, physicians' certainty of their patients' risk factor status increased. Certainty varied from an OR of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.8) for prior vertebral fracture status to 6.3 (95% CI: 2.3, 17.9) for prior hip fracture status. Furthermore, bone mineral density testing increased in high risk as compared with low risk patients (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.7). CONCLUSION: Quality Circle methodology was successful in increasing both physicians' awareness of osteoporosis risk factors and appropriate bone mineral density testing in accordance with the 2002 Canadian guidelines. BioMed Central 2008-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2567974/ /pubmed/18828906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-130 Text en Copyright © 2008 Ioannidis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ioannidis, George
Thabane, Lehana
Gafni, Amiram
Hodsman, Anthony
Kvern, Brent
Johnstone, Dan
Plumley, Nathalie
Salach, Lena
Jiwa, Famida
Adachi, Jonathan D
Papaioannou, Alexandra
Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project
title Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project
title_full Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project
title_fullStr Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project
title_short Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project
title_sort optimizing care in osteoporosis: the canadian quality circle project
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18828906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-130
work_keys_str_mv AT ioannidisgeorge optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject
AT thabanelehana optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject
AT gafniamiram optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject
AT hodsmananthony optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject
AT kvernbrent optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject
AT johnstonedan optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject
AT plumleynathalie optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject
AT salachlena optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject
AT jiwafamida optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject
AT adachijonathand optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject
AT papaioannoualexandra optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject