Cargando…
Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project
BACKGROUND: While the Osteoporosis Canada 2002 Canadian guidelines provided evidence based strategies in preventing, diagnosing, and managing this condition, publication and distribution of guidelines have not, in and of themselves, been shown to alter physicians clinical approaches. We hypothesize...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18828906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-130 |
_version_ | 1782160020504313856 |
---|---|
author | Ioannidis, George Thabane, Lehana Gafni, Amiram Hodsman, Anthony Kvern, Brent Johnstone, Dan Plumley, Nathalie Salach, Lena Jiwa, Famida Adachi, Jonathan D Papaioannou, Alexandra |
author_facet | Ioannidis, George Thabane, Lehana Gafni, Amiram Hodsman, Anthony Kvern, Brent Johnstone, Dan Plumley, Nathalie Salach, Lena Jiwa, Famida Adachi, Jonathan D Papaioannou, Alexandra |
author_sort | Ioannidis, George |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While the Osteoporosis Canada 2002 Canadian guidelines provided evidence based strategies in preventing, diagnosing, and managing this condition, publication and distribution of guidelines have not, in and of themselves, been shown to alter physicians clinical approaches. We hypothesize that primary care physicians enrolled in the Quality Circle project would change their patient management of osteoporosis in terms of awareness of osteoporosis risk factors and bone mineral density testing in accordance with the guidelines. METHODS: The project consisted of five Quality Circle phases that included: 1) Training & Baseline Data Collection, 2) First Educational Intervention & First Follow-Up Data Collection 3) First Strategy Implementation Session, 4) Final Educational Intervention & Final Follow-up Data Collection, and 5) Final Strategy Implementation Session. A total of 340 circle members formed 34 quality circles and participated in the study. The generalized estimating equations approach was used to model physician awareness of risk factors for osteoporosis and appropriate utilization of bone mineral density testing pre and post educational intervention (first year of the study). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: After the 1(st )year of the study, physicians' certainty of their patients' risk factor status increased. Certainty varied from an OR of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.8) for prior vertebral fracture status to 6.3 (95% CI: 2.3, 17.9) for prior hip fracture status. Furthermore, bone mineral density testing increased in high risk as compared with low risk patients (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.7). CONCLUSION: Quality Circle methodology was successful in increasing both physicians' awareness of osteoporosis risk factors and appropriate bone mineral density testing in accordance with the 2002 Canadian guidelines. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2567974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25679742008-10-16 Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project Ioannidis, George Thabane, Lehana Gafni, Amiram Hodsman, Anthony Kvern, Brent Johnstone, Dan Plumley, Nathalie Salach, Lena Jiwa, Famida Adachi, Jonathan D Papaioannou, Alexandra BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: While the Osteoporosis Canada 2002 Canadian guidelines provided evidence based strategies in preventing, diagnosing, and managing this condition, publication and distribution of guidelines have not, in and of themselves, been shown to alter physicians clinical approaches. We hypothesize that primary care physicians enrolled in the Quality Circle project would change their patient management of osteoporosis in terms of awareness of osteoporosis risk factors and bone mineral density testing in accordance with the guidelines. METHODS: The project consisted of five Quality Circle phases that included: 1) Training & Baseline Data Collection, 2) First Educational Intervention & First Follow-Up Data Collection 3) First Strategy Implementation Session, 4) Final Educational Intervention & Final Follow-up Data Collection, and 5) Final Strategy Implementation Session. A total of 340 circle members formed 34 quality circles and participated in the study. The generalized estimating equations approach was used to model physician awareness of risk factors for osteoporosis and appropriate utilization of bone mineral density testing pre and post educational intervention (first year of the study). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: After the 1(st )year of the study, physicians' certainty of their patients' risk factor status increased. Certainty varied from an OR of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.8) for prior vertebral fracture status to 6.3 (95% CI: 2.3, 17.9) for prior hip fracture status. Furthermore, bone mineral density testing increased in high risk as compared with low risk patients (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.7). CONCLUSION: Quality Circle methodology was successful in increasing both physicians' awareness of osteoporosis risk factors and appropriate bone mineral density testing in accordance with the 2002 Canadian guidelines. BioMed Central 2008-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2567974/ /pubmed/18828906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-130 Text en Copyright © 2008 Ioannidis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ioannidis, George Thabane, Lehana Gafni, Amiram Hodsman, Anthony Kvern, Brent Johnstone, Dan Plumley, Nathalie Salach, Lena Jiwa, Famida Adachi, Jonathan D Papaioannou, Alexandra Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project |
title | Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project |
title_full | Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project |
title_fullStr | Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project |
title_short | Optimizing care in osteoporosis: The Canadian quality circle project |
title_sort | optimizing care in osteoporosis: the canadian quality circle project |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18828906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ioannidisgeorge optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject AT thabanelehana optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject AT gafniamiram optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject AT hodsmananthony optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject AT kvernbrent optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject AT johnstonedan optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject AT plumleynathalie optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject AT salachlena optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject AT jiwafamida optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject AT adachijonathand optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject AT papaioannoualexandra optimizingcareinosteoporosisthecanadianqualitycircleproject |