Cargando…

The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: Shock or CPR? A population based prospective study

OBJECTIVES: In the early minutes of cardiac arrest, timing of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the basic life support phase (BLS CPR) is debated. Aims of this study were to provide in-hospital incidence and outcome data, and to investigate the relation between outcome and time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skogvoll, Eirik, Nordseth, Trond
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2568951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18957063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-16-11
_version_ 1782160049832984576
author Skogvoll, Eirik
Nordseth, Trond
author_facet Skogvoll, Eirik
Nordseth, Trond
author_sort Skogvoll, Eirik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In the early minutes of cardiac arrest, timing of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the basic life support phase (BLS CPR) is debated. Aims of this study were to provide in-hospital incidence and outcome data, and to investigate the relation between outcome and time from collapse to defibrillation, time to BLS CPR, and CPR quality. METHODS: Resuscitation attempts during a 3-year period at St. Olav's University Hospital (960 beds) were prospectively registered. The times between collapse and initiation of BLS CPR, and defibrillation were determined. CPR quality was assessed by the resuscitation team. The relation between these variables and outcome (short term survival and discharge) was explored using non-parametric correlation and logistic regression. RESULTS: CPR was started in a total of 223 arrests, an incidence of 77 episodes per 1000 beds per year. Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in 40%, and 29 patients (13%) survived to discharge. Median time from collapse to BLS CPR was 1 minute; CPR was judged to be of good quality in half of the episodes. CPR during the first 3 minutes in ventricular fibrillation (VF/VT) was negatively associated with survival, but later proved beneficial. For patients with non-shockable rhythms, we found no association between outcome and time to BLS or CPR quality. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that defibrillation should have priority during the first 3 minutes of VF/VT. Later, patients benefit from CPR in conjunction with defibrillation. Patients presenting with non-shockable rhythms have a grave prognosis, and the outcome was not associated with time to BLS or CPR quality.
format Text
id pubmed-2568951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25689512008-10-17 The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: Shock or CPR? A population based prospective study Skogvoll, Eirik Nordseth, Trond Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: In the early minutes of cardiac arrest, timing of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the basic life support phase (BLS CPR) is debated. Aims of this study were to provide in-hospital incidence and outcome data, and to investigate the relation between outcome and time from collapse to defibrillation, time to BLS CPR, and CPR quality. METHODS: Resuscitation attempts during a 3-year period at St. Olav's University Hospital (960 beds) were prospectively registered. The times between collapse and initiation of BLS CPR, and defibrillation were determined. CPR quality was assessed by the resuscitation team. The relation between these variables and outcome (short term survival and discharge) was explored using non-parametric correlation and logistic regression. RESULTS: CPR was started in a total of 223 arrests, an incidence of 77 episodes per 1000 beds per year. Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in 40%, and 29 patients (13%) survived to discharge. Median time from collapse to BLS CPR was 1 minute; CPR was judged to be of good quality in half of the episodes. CPR during the first 3 minutes in ventricular fibrillation (VF/VT) was negatively associated with survival, but later proved beneficial. For patients with non-shockable rhythms, we found no association between outcome and time to BLS or CPR quality. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that defibrillation should have priority during the first 3 minutes of VF/VT. Later, patients benefit from CPR in conjunction with defibrillation. Patients presenting with non-shockable rhythms have a grave prognosis, and the outcome was not associated with time to BLS or CPR quality. BioMed Central 2008-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2568951/ /pubmed/18957063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-16-11 Text en Copyright © 2008 Skogvoll and Nordseth; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Skogvoll, Eirik
Nordseth, Trond
The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: Shock or CPR? A population based prospective study
title The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: Shock or CPR? A population based prospective study
title_full The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: Shock or CPR? A population based prospective study
title_fullStr The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: Shock or CPR? A population based prospective study
title_full_unstemmed The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: Shock or CPR? A population based prospective study
title_short The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: Shock or CPR? A population based prospective study
title_sort early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: shock or cpr? a population based prospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2568951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18957063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-16-11
work_keys_str_mv AT skogvolleirik theearlyminutesofinhospitalcardiacarrestshockorcprapopulationbasedprospectivestudy
AT nordsethtrond theearlyminutesofinhospitalcardiacarrestshockorcprapopulationbasedprospectivestudy
AT skogvolleirik earlyminutesofinhospitalcardiacarrestshockorcprapopulationbasedprospectivestudy
AT nordsethtrond earlyminutesofinhospitalcardiacarrestshockorcprapopulationbasedprospectivestudy