Cargando…

The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment

BACKGROUND: Detecting malingering or exaggeration of impairments in brain function after traumatic brain injury is of increasing importance in neuropsychological assessment. Lawyers involved in brain injury litigation cases routinely coach their clients how to approach neuropsychological testing to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rüsseler, Jascha, Brett, Alexandra, Klaue, Ulrike, Sailer, Michael, Münte, Thomas F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2569062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18838010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-8-37
_version_ 1782160060428845056
author Rüsseler, Jascha
Brett, Alexandra
Klaue, Ulrike
Sailer, Michael
Münte, Thomas F
author_facet Rüsseler, Jascha
Brett, Alexandra
Klaue, Ulrike
Sailer, Michael
Münte, Thomas F
author_sort Rüsseler, Jascha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Detecting malingering or exaggeration of impairments in brain function after traumatic brain injury is of increasing importance in neuropsychological assessment. Lawyers involved in brain injury litigation cases routinely coach their clients how to approach neuropsychological testing to their advantage. Thus, it is important to know how robust assessment methods are with respect to symptom malingering or exaggeration. METHODS: The influence of different coaching methods on the simulated malingering of memory impairments is investigated in neurologically healthy participants using the Short-Term-Memory Test from the Bremer Symptom-Validierung (STM-BSV). Cut-offs were derived from patients with mild to severe traumatic brain injury. For comparison purposes, the German adaptation of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), and the Rey 15 Items Test (FIT) were additionally administered. Four groups of neurologically healthy subjects were instructed to (1) perform as best as they can, (2) simulate brain injury, (3) simulate brain injury and received additional information about the sequelae of head trauma, (4) simulate brain injury and received additional information on how to avoid detection. Furthermore, a group of patients with mild to severe closed head injury performed the tests with best effort. RESULTS: The naïve simulator and the symptom coached groups were the easiest to detect, whereas the symptom plus test coached group was the hardest to detect. The AVLT and the FIT were not suited to detect simulators (sensitivities from 0% to 50.8% at 75% specificity) whereas the STM-BSV detected simulators with 67% – 88% sensitivity at a specificity of 73%. However, the STM-BSV was not robust to coaching. CONCLUSION: The present investigation shows that symptom validity testing as implemented in the BSV-STM is one clinically useful element in the detection of memory malingering. However, clinicians have to be aware that coaching influences performance in the test.
format Text
id pubmed-2569062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25690622008-10-17 The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment Rüsseler, Jascha Brett, Alexandra Klaue, Ulrike Sailer, Michael Münte, Thomas F BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Detecting malingering or exaggeration of impairments in brain function after traumatic brain injury is of increasing importance in neuropsychological assessment. Lawyers involved in brain injury litigation cases routinely coach their clients how to approach neuropsychological testing to their advantage. Thus, it is important to know how robust assessment methods are with respect to symptom malingering or exaggeration. METHODS: The influence of different coaching methods on the simulated malingering of memory impairments is investigated in neurologically healthy participants using the Short-Term-Memory Test from the Bremer Symptom-Validierung (STM-BSV). Cut-offs were derived from patients with mild to severe traumatic brain injury. For comparison purposes, the German adaptation of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), and the Rey 15 Items Test (FIT) were additionally administered. Four groups of neurologically healthy subjects were instructed to (1) perform as best as they can, (2) simulate brain injury, (3) simulate brain injury and received additional information about the sequelae of head trauma, (4) simulate brain injury and received additional information on how to avoid detection. Furthermore, a group of patients with mild to severe closed head injury performed the tests with best effort. RESULTS: The naïve simulator and the symptom coached groups were the easiest to detect, whereas the symptom plus test coached group was the hardest to detect. The AVLT and the FIT were not suited to detect simulators (sensitivities from 0% to 50.8% at 75% specificity) whereas the STM-BSV detected simulators with 67% – 88% sensitivity at a specificity of 73%. However, the STM-BSV was not robust to coaching. CONCLUSION: The present investigation shows that symptom validity testing as implemented in the BSV-STM is one clinically useful element in the detection of memory malingering. However, clinicians have to be aware that coaching influences performance in the test. BioMed Central 2008-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2569062/ /pubmed/18838010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-8-37 Text en Copyright © 2008 Rüsseler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rüsseler, Jascha
Brett, Alexandra
Klaue, Ulrike
Sailer, Michael
Münte, Thomas F
The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment
title The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment
title_full The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment
title_fullStr The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment
title_full_unstemmed The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment
title_short The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment
title_sort effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2569062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18838010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-8-37
work_keys_str_mv AT russelerjascha theeffectofcoachingonthesimulatedmalingeringofmemoryimpairment
AT brettalexandra theeffectofcoachingonthesimulatedmalingeringofmemoryimpairment
AT klaueulrike theeffectofcoachingonthesimulatedmalingeringofmemoryimpairment
AT sailermichael theeffectofcoachingonthesimulatedmalingeringofmemoryimpairment
AT muntethomasf theeffectofcoachingonthesimulatedmalingeringofmemoryimpairment
AT russelerjascha effectofcoachingonthesimulatedmalingeringofmemoryimpairment
AT brettalexandra effectofcoachingonthesimulatedmalingeringofmemoryimpairment
AT klaueulrike effectofcoachingonthesimulatedmalingeringofmemoryimpairment
AT sailermichael effectofcoachingonthesimulatedmalingeringofmemoryimpairment
AT muntethomasf effectofcoachingonthesimulatedmalingeringofmemoryimpairment