Cargando…

The right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)?

The two halves of the brain are believed to play different roles in emotional processing, but the specific contribution of each hemisphere continues to be debated. The right-hemisphere hypothesis suggests that the right cerebrum is dominant for processing all emotions regardless of affective valence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Killgore, William D. S., Yurgelun-Todd, Deborah A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2569811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18985144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm020
_version_ 1782160084420263936
author Killgore, William D. S.
Yurgelun-Todd, Deborah A.
author_facet Killgore, William D. S.
Yurgelun-Todd, Deborah A.
author_sort Killgore, William D. S.
collection PubMed
description The two halves of the brain are believed to play different roles in emotional processing, but the specific contribution of each hemisphere continues to be debated. The right-hemisphere hypothesis suggests that the right cerebrum is dominant for processing all emotions regardless of affective valence, whereas the valence specific hypothesis posits that the left hemisphere is specialized for processing positive affect while the right hemisphere is specialized for negative affect. Here, healthy participants viewed two split visual-field facial affect perception tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging, one presenting chimeric happy faces (i.e. half happy/half neutral) and the other presenting identical sad chimera (i.e. half sad/half neutral), each masked immediately by a neutral face. Results suggest that the posterior right hemisphere is generically activated during non-conscious emotional face perception regardless of affective valence, although greater activation is produced by negative facial cues. The posterior left hemisphere was generally less activated by emotional faces, but also appeared to recruit bilateral anterior brain regions in a valence-specific manner. Findings suggest simultaneous operation of aspects of both hypotheses, suggesting that these two rival theories may not actually be in opposition, but may instead reflect different facets of a complex distributed emotion processing system.
format Text
id pubmed-2569811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25698112008-10-27 The right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)? Killgore, William D. S. Yurgelun-Todd, Deborah A. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles The two halves of the brain are believed to play different roles in emotional processing, but the specific contribution of each hemisphere continues to be debated. The right-hemisphere hypothesis suggests that the right cerebrum is dominant for processing all emotions regardless of affective valence, whereas the valence specific hypothesis posits that the left hemisphere is specialized for processing positive affect while the right hemisphere is specialized for negative affect. Here, healthy participants viewed two split visual-field facial affect perception tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging, one presenting chimeric happy faces (i.e. half happy/half neutral) and the other presenting identical sad chimera (i.e. half sad/half neutral), each masked immediately by a neutral face. Results suggest that the posterior right hemisphere is generically activated during non-conscious emotional face perception regardless of affective valence, although greater activation is produced by negative facial cues. The posterior left hemisphere was generally less activated by emotional faces, but also appeared to recruit bilateral anterior brain regions in a valence-specific manner. Findings suggest simultaneous operation of aspects of both hypotheses, suggesting that these two rival theories may not actually be in opposition, but may instead reflect different facets of a complex distributed emotion processing system. Oxford University Press 2007-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2569811/ /pubmed/18985144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm020 Text en © 2007 The Author(s)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Killgore, William D. S.
Yurgelun-Todd, Deborah A.
The right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)?
title The right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)?
title_full The right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)?
title_fullStr The right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)?
title_full_unstemmed The right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)?
title_short The right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)?
title_sort right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2569811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18985144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm020
work_keys_str_mv AT killgorewilliamds therighthemisphereandvalencehypothesescouldtheybothberightandsometimesleft
AT yurgeluntodddeboraha therighthemisphereandvalencehypothesescouldtheybothberightandsometimesleft
AT killgorewilliamds righthemisphereandvalencehypothesescouldtheybothberightandsometimesleft
AT yurgeluntodddeboraha righthemisphereandvalencehypothesescouldtheybothberightandsometimesleft