Cargando…
Patterns of Hybrid Loss of Imprinting Reveal Tissue- and Cluster-Specific Regulation
BACKGROUND: Crosses between natural populations of two species of deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus (BW), and P. polionotus (PO), produce parent-of-origin effects on growth and development. BW females mated to PO males (bw×po) produce growth-retarded but otherwise healthy offspring. In contrast, PO...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2570336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18958286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003572 |
_version_ | 1782160114967379968 |
---|---|
author | Wiley, Christopher D. Matundan, Harry H. Duselis, Amanda R. Isaacs, Alison T. Vrana, Paul B. |
author_facet | Wiley, Christopher D. Matundan, Harry H. Duselis, Amanda R. Isaacs, Alison T. Vrana, Paul B. |
author_sort | Wiley, Christopher D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Crosses between natural populations of two species of deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus (BW), and P. polionotus (PO), produce parent-of-origin effects on growth and development. BW females mated to PO males (bw×po) produce growth-retarded but otherwise healthy offspring. In contrast, PO females mated to BW males (PO×BW) produce overgrown and severely defective offspring. The hybrid phenotypes are pronounced in the placenta and include PO×BW conceptuses which lack embryonic structures. Evidence to date links variation in control of genomic imprinting with the hybrid defects, particularly in the PO×BW offspring. Establishment of genomic imprinting is typically mediated by gametic DNA methylation at sites known as gDMRs. However, imprinted gene clusters vary in their regulation by gDMR sequences. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we further assess imprinted gene expression and DNA methylation at different cluster types in order to discern patterns. These data reveal PO×BW misexpression at the Kcnq1ot1 and Peg3 clusters, both of which lose ICR methylation in placental tissues. In contrast, some embryonic transcripts (Peg10, Kcnq1ot1) reactivated the silenced allele with little or no loss of DNA methylation. Hybrid brains also display different patterns of imprinting perturbations. Several cluster pairs thought to use analogous regulatory mechanisms are differentially affected in the hybrids. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data reinforce the hypothesis that placental and somatic gene regulation differs significantly, as does that between imprinted gene clusters and between species. That such epigenetic regulatory variation exists in recently diverged species suggests a role in reproductive isolation, and that this variation is likely to be adaptive. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2570336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25703362008-10-29 Patterns of Hybrid Loss of Imprinting Reveal Tissue- and Cluster-Specific Regulation Wiley, Christopher D. Matundan, Harry H. Duselis, Amanda R. Isaacs, Alison T. Vrana, Paul B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Crosses between natural populations of two species of deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus (BW), and P. polionotus (PO), produce parent-of-origin effects on growth and development. BW females mated to PO males (bw×po) produce growth-retarded but otherwise healthy offspring. In contrast, PO females mated to BW males (PO×BW) produce overgrown and severely defective offspring. The hybrid phenotypes are pronounced in the placenta and include PO×BW conceptuses which lack embryonic structures. Evidence to date links variation in control of genomic imprinting with the hybrid defects, particularly in the PO×BW offspring. Establishment of genomic imprinting is typically mediated by gametic DNA methylation at sites known as gDMRs. However, imprinted gene clusters vary in their regulation by gDMR sequences. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we further assess imprinted gene expression and DNA methylation at different cluster types in order to discern patterns. These data reveal PO×BW misexpression at the Kcnq1ot1 and Peg3 clusters, both of which lose ICR methylation in placental tissues. In contrast, some embryonic transcripts (Peg10, Kcnq1ot1) reactivated the silenced allele with little or no loss of DNA methylation. Hybrid brains also display different patterns of imprinting perturbations. Several cluster pairs thought to use analogous regulatory mechanisms are differentially affected in the hybrids. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data reinforce the hypothesis that placental and somatic gene regulation differs significantly, as does that between imprinted gene clusters and between species. That such epigenetic regulatory variation exists in recently diverged species suggests a role in reproductive isolation, and that this variation is likely to be adaptive. Public Library of Science 2008-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2570336/ /pubmed/18958286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003572 Text en Wiley et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wiley, Christopher D. Matundan, Harry H. Duselis, Amanda R. Isaacs, Alison T. Vrana, Paul B. Patterns of Hybrid Loss of Imprinting Reveal Tissue- and Cluster-Specific Regulation |
title | Patterns of Hybrid Loss of Imprinting Reveal Tissue- and Cluster-Specific Regulation |
title_full | Patterns of Hybrid Loss of Imprinting Reveal Tissue- and Cluster-Specific Regulation |
title_fullStr | Patterns of Hybrid Loss of Imprinting Reveal Tissue- and Cluster-Specific Regulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Patterns of Hybrid Loss of Imprinting Reveal Tissue- and Cluster-Specific Regulation |
title_short | Patterns of Hybrid Loss of Imprinting Reveal Tissue- and Cluster-Specific Regulation |
title_sort | patterns of hybrid loss of imprinting reveal tissue- and cluster-specific regulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2570336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18958286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wileychristopherd patternsofhybridlossofimprintingrevealtissueandclusterspecificregulation AT matundanharryh patternsofhybridlossofimprintingrevealtissueandclusterspecificregulation AT duselisamandar patternsofhybridlossofimprintingrevealtissueandclusterspecificregulation AT isaacsalisont patternsofhybridlossofimprintingrevealtissueandclusterspecificregulation AT vranapaulb patternsofhybridlossofimprintingrevealtissueandclusterspecificregulation |