Cargando…

Differentiation between external and internal cuing: An fMRI study comparing tracing with drawing

Externally cued movement is thought to preferentially involve cerebellar and premotor circuits whereas internally generated movement recruits basal ganglia, pre-supplementary motor cortex (pre-SMA) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Tracing and drawing are exemplar externally and internally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gowen, E., Miall, R.C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2570483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17448689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.005
_version_ 1782160138216407040
author Gowen, E.
Miall, R.C.
author_facet Gowen, E.
Miall, R.C.
author_sort Gowen, E.
collection PubMed
description Externally cued movement is thought to preferentially involve cerebellar and premotor circuits whereas internally generated movement recruits basal ganglia, pre-supplementary motor cortex (pre-SMA) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Tracing and drawing are exemplar externally and internally guided actions and Parkinson's patients and cerebellar patients show deficits in tracking and drawing, respectively. In this study we aimed to examine this external/internal distinction in healthy subjects using functional imaging. Ten healthy subjects performed tracing and drawing of simple geometric shapes using pencil and paper while in a 3-T fMRI scanner. Results indicated that compared to tracing, drawing generated greater activation in the right cerebellar crus I, bilateral pre-SMA, right dorsal premotor cortex and right frontal eye field. Tracing did not recruit any additional activation compared to drawing except in striate and extrastriate visual areas. Therefore, drawing recruited areas more frequently associated with cognitively challenging tasks, attention and memory, but basal ganglia and cerebellar activity did not differentiate tracing from drawing in the hypothesised manner. As our paradigm was of a simple, repetitive and static design, these results suggest that the task familiarity and the temporal nature of visual feedback in tracking tasks, compared to tracing, may be important contributing factors towards the degree of cerebellar involvement. Future studies comparing dynamic with static external cues and visual feedback may clarify the role of the cerebellum and basal ganglia in the visual guidance of drawing actions.
format Text
id pubmed-2570483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25704832008-10-21 Differentiation between external and internal cuing: An fMRI study comparing tracing with drawing Gowen, E. Miall, R.C. Neuroimage Article Externally cued movement is thought to preferentially involve cerebellar and premotor circuits whereas internally generated movement recruits basal ganglia, pre-supplementary motor cortex (pre-SMA) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Tracing and drawing are exemplar externally and internally guided actions and Parkinson's patients and cerebellar patients show deficits in tracking and drawing, respectively. In this study we aimed to examine this external/internal distinction in healthy subjects using functional imaging. Ten healthy subjects performed tracing and drawing of simple geometric shapes using pencil and paper while in a 3-T fMRI scanner. Results indicated that compared to tracing, drawing generated greater activation in the right cerebellar crus I, bilateral pre-SMA, right dorsal premotor cortex and right frontal eye field. Tracing did not recruit any additional activation compared to drawing except in striate and extrastriate visual areas. Therefore, drawing recruited areas more frequently associated with cognitively challenging tasks, attention and memory, but basal ganglia and cerebellar activity did not differentiate tracing from drawing in the hypothesised manner. As our paradigm was of a simple, repetitive and static design, these results suggest that the task familiarity and the temporal nature of visual feedback in tracking tasks, compared to tracing, may be important contributing factors towards the degree of cerebellar involvement. Future studies comparing dynamic with static external cues and visual feedback may clarify the role of the cerebellum and basal ganglia in the visual guidance of drawing actions. Academic Press 2007-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2570483/ /pubmed/17448689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.005 Text en © 2007 Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Gowen, E.
Miall, R.C.
Differentiation between external and internal cuing: An fMRI study comparing tracing with drawing
title Differentiation between external and internal cuing: An fMRI study comparing tracing with drawing
title_full Differentiation between external and internal cuing: An fMRI study comparing tracing with drawing
title_fullStr Differentiation between external and internal cuing: An fMRI study comparing tracing with drawing
title_full_unstemmed Differentiation between external and internal cuing: An fMRI study comparing tracing with drawing
title_short Differentiation between external and internal cuing: An fMRI study comparing tracing with drawing
title_sort differentiation between external and internal cuing: an fmri study comparing tracing with drawing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2570483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17448689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.005
work_keys_str_mv AT gowene differentiationbetweenexternalandinternalcuinganfmristudycomparingtracingwithdrawing
AT miallrc differentiationbetweenexternalandinternalcuinganfmristudycomparingtracingwithdrawing