Cargando…
SCLC extensive disease – treatment guidance by extent or/and biology of response?
In extensive disease of small cell lung cancer a doubling of the one-year-survival rate was reported in August 2007 by prophylactic cranial irradiation applied to patients who experienced any response to initial chemotherapy. We discuss the treatment concept of extensive disease in the face of the l...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2570671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18831728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-3-33 |
_version_ | 1782160164294492160 |
---|---|
author | Eckert, Franziska Müller, Arndt-Christian |
author_facet | Eckert, Franziska Müller, Arndt-Christian |
author_sort | Eckert, Franziska |
collection | PubMed |
description | In extensive disease of small cell lung cancer a doubling of the one-year-survival rate was reported in August 2007 by prophylactic cranial irradiation applied to patients who experienced any response to initial chemotherapy. We discuss the treatment concept of extensive disease in the face of the latest results and older studies with additional thoracic irradiation in this subgroup. A randomized trial with prophylactic cranial irradiation published in 1999 demonstrated an improvement of 5-year-overall-survival for complete responders (at least at distant levels) receiving additional thoracic radiochemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone (9.1% vs. 3.7%). But, these results were almost neglected and thoracic radiotherapy was not further investigated for good responders of extensive disease. However, in the light of current advances by prophylactic cranial irradiation these findings are noteworthy on all accounts. Considering both, a possible interpretation of these data could be a survival benefit of local control by simultaneous thoracic radiochemotherapy in the case of improved distant control due to chemotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation. Furthermore the question arises whether the tumor biology indicated by the response to chemotherapy should be integrated in the present classification. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2570671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25706712008-10-22 SCLC extensive disease – treatment guidance by extent or/and biology of response? Eckert, Franziska Müller, Arndt-Christian Radiat Oncol Commentary In extensive disease of small cell lung cancer a doubling of the one-year-survival rate was reported in August 2007 by prophylactic cranial irradiation applied to patients who experienced any response to initial chemotherapy. We discuss the treatment concept of extensive disease in the face of the latest results and older studies with additional thoracic irradiation in this subgroup. A randomized trial with prophylactic cranial irradiation published in 1999 demonstrated an improvement of 5-year-overall-survival for complete responders (at least at distant levels) receiving additional thoracic radiochemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone (9.1% vs. 3.7%). But, these results were almost neglected and thoracic radiotherapy was not further investigated for good responders of extensive disease. However, in the light of current advances by prophylactic cranial irradiation these findings are noteworthy on all accounts. Considering both, a possible interpretation of these data could be a survival benefit of local control by simultaneous thoracic radiochemotherapy in the case of improved distant control due to chemotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation. Furthermore the question arises whether the tumor biology indicated by the response to chemotherapy should be integrated in the present classification. BioMed Central 2008-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2570671/ /pubmed/18831728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-3-33 Text en Copyright © 2008 Eckert and Müller; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Eckert, Franziska Müller, Arndt-Christian SCLC extensive disease – treatment guidance by extent or/and biology of response? |
title | SCLC extensive disease – treatment guidance by extent or/and biology of response? |
title_full | SCLC extensive disease – treatment guidance by extent or/and biology of response? |
title_fullStr | SCLC extensive disease – treatment guidance by extent or/and biology of response? |
title_full_unstemmed | SCLC extensive disease – treatment guidance by extent or/and biology of response? |
title_short | SCLC extensive disease – treatment guidance by extent or/and biology of response? |
title_sort | sclc extensive disease – treatment guidance by extent or/and biology of response? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2570671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18831728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-3-33 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eckertfranziska sclcextensivediseasetreatmentguidancebyextentorandbiologyofresponse AT mullerarndtchristian sclcextensivediseasetreatmentguidancebyextentorandbiologyofresponse |