Cargando…

Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: A process evaluation

BACKGROUND: Falls are a major health threat to older community-living people, and initiatives to prevent falls should be a public health priority. We evaluated a Dutch version of a successful British fall prevention programme. Results of this Dutch study showed no effects on falls or daily functioni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bleijlevens, Michel HC, Hendriks, Marike RC, van Haastregt, Jolanda CM, van Rossum, Erik, Kempen, Gertrudis IJM, Diederiks, Joseph PM, Crebolder, Harry FJM, van Eijk, Jacques ThM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2570681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18816381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-332
_version_ 1782160166646448128
author Bleijlevens, Michel HC
Hendriks, Marike RC
van Haastregt, Jolanda CM
van Rossum, Erik
Kempen, Gertrudis IJM
Diederiks, Joseph PM
Crebolder, Harry FJM
van Eijk, Jacques ThM
author_facet Bleijlevens, Michel HC
Hendriks, Marike RC
van Haastregt, Jolanda CM
van Rossum, Erik
Kempen, Gertrudis IJM
Diederiks, Joseph PM
Crebolder, Harry FJM
van Eijk, Jacques ThM
author_sort Bleijlevens, Michel HC
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Falls are a major health threat to older community-living people, and initiatives to prevent falls should be a public health priority. We evaluated a Dutch version of a successful British fall prevention programme. Results of this Dutch study showed no effects on falls or daily functioning. In parallel to the effect evaluation, we carried out a detailed process evaluation to assess the feasibility of our multidisciplinary fall prevention programme. The present study reports on the results of this process evaluation. METHODS: Our fall prevention programme comprised a medical and occupational-therapy assessment, resulting in recommendations and/or referrals to other services if indicated. We used self-administered questionnaires, structured telephone interviews, structured recording forms, structured face-to-face interviews and a plenary group discussion to collect data from participants allocated to the intervention group (n = 166) and from all practitioners who performed the assessments (n = 8). The following outcomes were assessed: the extent to which the multidisciplinary fall prevention programme was performed according to protocol, the nature of the recommendations and referrals provided to the participants, participants' self-reported compliance and participants' and practitioners' opinions about the programme. RESULTS: Both participants and practitioners judged the programme to be feasible. The programme was largely performed according to protocol. The number of referrals and recommendations ensuing from the medical assessment was relatively small. Participants' self-reported compliance as regards contacting their GP to be informed of the recommendations and/or referrals was low to moderate. However, self-reported compliance with such referrals and recommendations was reasonable to good. A large majority of participants reported they had benefited from the programme. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study show that the programme was feasible for both practitioners and participants. Main factors that seem to be responsible for the lack of effectiveness are the relatively low number of referrals and recommendations ensuing from the medical assessments and participants' low compliance as regards contacting their GP about the results of the medical assessment. We do not recommend implementing the programme in its present form in regular care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN64716113
format Text
id pubmed-2570681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25706812008-10-22 Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: A process evaluation Bleijlevens, Michel HC Hendriks, Marike RC van Haastregt, Jolanda CM van Rossum, Erik Kempen, Gertrudis IJM Diederiks, Joseph PM Crebolder, Harry FJM van Eijk, Jacques ThM BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Falls are a major health threat to older community-living people, and initiatives to prevent falls should be a public health priority. We evaluated a Dutch version of a successful British fall prevention programme. Results of this Dutch study showed no effects on falls or daily functioning. In parallel to the effect evaluation, we carried out a detailed process evaluation to assess the feasibility of our multidisciplinary fall prevention programme. The present study reports on the results of this process evaluation. METHODS: Our fall prevention programme comprised a medical and occupational-therapy assessment, resulting in recommendations and/or referrals to other services if indicated. We used self-administered questionnaires, structured telephone interviews, structured recording forms, structured face-to-face interviews and a plenary group discussion to collect data from participants allocated to the intervention group (n = 166) and from all practitioners who performed the assessments (n = 8). The following outcomes were assessed: the extent to which the multidisciplinary fall prevention programme was performed according to protocol, the nature of the recommendations and referrals provided to the participants, participants' self-reported compliance and participants' and practitioners' opinions about the programme. RESULTS: Both participants and practitioners judged the programme to be feasible. The programme was largely performed according to protocol. The number of referrals and recommendations ensuing from the medical assessment was relatively small. Participants' self-reported compliance as regards contacting their GP to be informed of the recommendations and/or referrals was low to moderate. However, self-reported compliance with such referrals and recommendations was reasonable to good. A large majority of participants reported they had benefited from the programme. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study show that the programme was feasible for both practitioners and participants. Main factors that seem to be responsible for the lack of effectiveness are the relatively low number of referrals and recommendations ensuing from the medical assessments and participants' low compliance as regards contacting their GP about the results of the medical assessment. We do not recommend implementing the programme in its present form in regular care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN64716113 BioMed Central 2008-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2570681/ /pubmed/18816381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-332 Text en Copyright © 2008 Bleijlevens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bleijlevens, Michel HC
Hendriks, Marike RC
van Haastregt, Jolanda CM
van Rossum, Erik
Kempen, Gertrudis IJM
Diederiks, Joseph PM
Crebolder, Harry FJM
van Eijk, Jacques ThM
Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: A process evaluation
title Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: A process evaluation
title_full Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: A process evaluation
title_fullStr Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: A process evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: A process evaluation
title_short Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: A process evaluation
title_sort process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: a process evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2570681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18816381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-332
work_keys_str_mv AT bleijlevensmichelhc processfactorsexplainingtheineffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryfallpreventionprogrammeaprocessevaluation
AT hendriksmarikerc processfactorsexplainingtheineffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryfallpreventionprogrammeaprocessevaluation
AT vanhaastregtjolandacm processfactorsexplainingtheineffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryfallpreventionprogrammeaprocessevaluation
AT vanrossumerik processfactorsexplainingtheineffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryfallpreventionprogrammeaprocessevaluation
AT kempengertrudisijm processfactorsexplainingtheineffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryfallpreventionprogrammeaprocessevaluation
AT diederiksjosephpm processfactorsexplainingtheineffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryfallpreventionprogrammeaprocessevaluation
AT crebolderharryfjm processfactorsexplainingtheineffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryfallpreventionprogrammeaprocessevaluation
AT vaneijkjacquesthm processfactorsexplainingtheineffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryfallpreventionprogrammeaprocessevaluation