Cargando…

Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Acoustic lung imaging offers a unique method for visualising the lung. This study was designed to demonstrate reproducibility of acoustic lung images recorded from healthy individuals at different time points and to assess intra- and inter-rater agreement in the assessment of dyn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maher, T M, Gat, M, Allen, D, Devaraj, A, Wells, A U, Geddes, D M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2571960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18024534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2007.086405
_version_ 1782160221766942720
author Maher, T M
Gat, M
Allen, D
Devaraj, A
Wells, A U
Geddes, D M
author_facet Maher, T M
Gat, M
Allen, D
Devaraj, A
Wells, A U
Geddes, D M
author_sort Maher, T M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Acoustic lung imaging offers a unique method for visualising the lung. This study was designed to demonstrate reproducibility of acoustic lung images recorded from healthy individuals at different time points and to assess intra- and inter-rater agreement in the assessment of dynamically represented acoustic lung images. METHODS: Recordings from 29 healthy volunteers were made on three separate occasions using vibration response imaging. Reproducibility was measured using quantitative, computerised assessment of vibration energy. Dynamically represented acoustic lung images were scored by six blinded raters. RESULTS: Quantitative measurement of acoustic recordings was highly reproducible with an intraclass correlation score of 0.86 (very good agreement). Intraclass correlations for inter-rater agreement and reproducibility were 0.61 (good agreement) and 0.86 (very good agreement), respectively. There was no significant difference found between the six raters at any time point. Raters ranged from 88% to 95% in their ability to identically evaluate the different features of the same image presented to them blinded on two separate occasions. CONCLUSION: Acoustic lung imaging is reproducible in healthy individuals. Graphic representation of lung images can be interpreted with a high degree of accuracy by the same and by different reviewers.
format Text
id pubmed-2571960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25719602008-10-24 Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals Maher, T M Gat, M Allen, D Devaraj, A Wells, A U Geddes, D M Thorax Respiratory Physiology BACKGROUND AND AIM: Acoustic lung imaging offers a unique method for visualising the lung. This study was designed to demonstrate reproducibility of acoustic lung images recorded from healthy individuals at different time points and to assess intra- and inter-rater agreement in the assessment of dynamically represented acoustic lung images. METHODS: Recordings from 29 healthy volunteers were made on three separate occasions using vibration response imaging. Reproducibility was measured using quantitative, computerised assessment of vibration energy. Dynamically represented acoustic lung images were scored by six blinded raters. RESULTS: Quantitative measurement of acoustic recordings was highly reproducible with an intraclass correlation score of 0.86 (very good agreement). Intraclass correlations for inter-rater agreement and reproducibility were 0.61 (good agreement) and 0.86 (very good agreement), respectively. There was no significant difference found between the six raters at any time point. Raters ranged from 88% to 95% in their ability to identically evaluate the different features of the same image presented to them blinded on two separate occasions. CONCLUSION: Acoustic lung imaging is reproducible in healthy individuals. Graphic representation of lung images can be interpreted with a high degree of accuracy by the same and by different reviewers. BMJ Publishing Group 2008-06 2007-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2571960/ /pubmed/18024534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2007.086405 Text en © Maher et al 2008 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Respiratory Physiology
Maher, T M
Gat, M
Allen, D
Devaraj, A
Wells, A U
Geddes, D M
Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals
title Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals
title_full Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals
title_fullStr Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals
title_short Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals
title_sort reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals
topic Respiratory Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2571960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18024534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2007.086405
work_keys_str_mv AT mahertm reproducibilityofdynamicallyrepresentedacousticlungimagesfromhealthyindividuals
AT gatm reproducibilityofdynamicallyrepresentedacousticlungimagesfromhealthyindividuals
AT allend reproducibilityofdynamicallyrepresentedacousticlungimagesfromhealthyindividuals
AT devaraja reproducibilityofdynamicallyrepresentedacousticlungimagesfromhealthyindividuals
AT wellsau reproducibilityofdynamicallyrepresentedacousticlungimagesfromhealthyindividuals
AT geddesdm reproducibilityofdynamicallyrepresentedacousticlungimagesfromhealthyindividuals