Cargando…

Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompts on reader behaviour in a large sample of breast screening mammograms by analysing the relationship of the presence and size of prompts to the recall decision. METHODS: Local researc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilbert, Fiona J, Astley, Susan M, Boggis, Caroline RM, McGee, Magnus A, Griffiths, Pamela M, Duffy, Stephen W, Agbaje, Olorunsola F, Gillan, Maureen GC, Wilson, Mary, Jain, Anil K, Barr, Nicola, Beetles, Ursula M, Griffiths, Miriam A, Johnson, Jill, Roberts, Rita M, Deans, Heather E, Duncan, Karen A, Iyengar, Geeta
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2575546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18724867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2137
_version_ 1782160327258931200
author Gilbert, Fiona J
Astley, Susan M
Boggis, Caroline RM
McGee, Magnus A
Griffiths, Pamela M
Duffy, Stephen W
Agbaje, Olorunsola F
Gillan, Maureen GC
Wilson, Mary
Jain, Anil K
Barr, Nicola
Beetles, Ursula M
Griffiths, Miriam A
Johnson, Jill
Roberts, Rita M
Deans, Heather E
Duncan, Karen A
Iyengar, Geeta
author_facet Gilbert, Fiona J
Astley, Susan M
Boggis, Caroline RM
McGee, Magnus A
Griffiths, Pamela M
Duffy, Stephen W
Agbaje, Olorunsola F
Gillan, Maureen GC
Wilson, Mary
Jain, Anil K
Barr, Nicola
Beetles, Ursula M
Griffiths, Miriam A
Johnson, Jill
Roberts, Rita M
Deans, Heather E
Duncan, Karen A
Iyengar, Geeta
author_sort Gilbert, Fiona J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompts on reader behaviour in a large sample of breast screening mammograms by analysing the relationship of the presence and size of prompts to the recall decision. METHODS: Local research ethics committee approval was obtained; informed consent was not required. Mammograms were obtained from women attending routine mammography at two breast screening centres in 1996. Films, previously double read, were re-read by a different reader using CAD. The study material included 315 cancer cases comprising all screen-detected cancer cases, all subsequent interval cancers and 861 normal cases randomly selected from 10,267 cases. Ground truth data were used to assess the efficacy of CAD prompting. Associations between prompt attributes and tumour features or reader recall decisions were assessed by chi-squared tests. RESULTS: There was a highly significant relationship between prompting and a decision to recall for cancer cases and for a random sample of normal cases (P < 0.001). Sixty-four per cent of all cases contained at least one CAD prompt. In cancer cases, larger prompts were more likely to be recalled (P = 0.02) for masses but there was no such association for calcifications (P = 0.9). In a random sample of 861 normal cases, larger prompts were more likely to be recalled (P = 0.02) for both mass and calcification prompts. Significant associations were observed with prompting and breast density (p = 0.009) for cancer cases but not for normal cases (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For both normal cases and cancer cases, prompted mammograms were more likely to be recalled and the prompt size was also associated with a recall decision.
format Text
id pubmed-2575546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25755462008-10-30 Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions Gilbert, Fiona J Astley, Susan M Boggis, Caroline RM McGee, Magnus A Griffiths, Pamela M Duffy, Stephen W Agbaje, Olorunsola F Gillan, Maureen GC Wilson, Mary Jain, Anil K Barr, Nicola Beetles, Ursula M Griffiths, Miriam A Johnson, Jill Roberts, Rita M Deans, Heather E Duncan, Karen A Iyengar, Geeta Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompts on reader behaviour in a large sample of breast screening mammograms by analysing the relationship of the presence and size of prompts to the recall decision. METHODS: Local research ethics committee approval was obtained; informed consent was not required. Mammograms were obtained from women attending routine mammography at two breast screening centres in 1996. Films, previously double read, were re-read by a different reader using CAD. The study material included 315 cancer cases comprising all screen-detected cancer cases, all subsequent interval cancers and 861 normal cases randomly selected from 10,267 cases. Ground truth data were used to assess the efficacy of CAD prompting. Associations between prompt attributes and tumour features or reader recall decisions were assessed by chi-squared tests. RESULTS: There was a highly significant relationship between prompting and a decision to recall for cancer cases and for a random sample of normal cases (P < 0.001). Sixty-four per cent of all cases contained at least one CAD prompt. In cancer cases, larger prompts were more likely to be recalled (P = 0.02) for masses but there was no such association for calcifications (P = 0.9). In a random sample of 861 normal cases, larger prompts were more likely to be recalled (P = 0.02) for both mass and calcification prompts. Significant associations were observed with prompting and breast density (p = 0.009) for cancer cases but not for normal cases (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For both normal cases and cancer cases, prompted mammograms were more likely to be recalled and the prompt size was also associated with a recall decision. BioMed Central 2008 2008-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2575546/ /pubmed/18724867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2137 Text en Copyright © 2008 Gilbert et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gilbert, Fiona J
Astley, Susan M
Boggis, Caroline RM
McGee, Magnus A
Griffiths, Pamela M
Duffy, Stephen W
Agbaje, Olorunsola F
Gillan, Maureen GC
Wilson, Mary
Jain, Anil K
Barr, Nicola
Beetles, Ursula M
Griffiths, Miriam A
Johnson, Jill
Roberts, Rita M
Deans, Heather E
Duncan, Karen A
Iyengar, Geeta
Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions
title Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions
title_full Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions
title_fullStr Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions
title_full_unstemmed Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions
title_short Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions
title_sort variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2575546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18724867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2137
work_keys_str_mv AT gilbertfionaj variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT astleysusanm variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT boggiscarolinerm variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT mcgeemagnusa variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT griffithspamelam variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT duffystephenw variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT agbajeolorunsolaf variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT gillanmaureengc variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT wilsonmary variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT jainanilk variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT barrnicola variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT beetlesursulam variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT griffithsmiriama variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT johnsonjill variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT robertsritam variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT deansheathere variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT duncankarena variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions
AT iyengargeeta variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions