Cargando…
Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompts on reader behaviour in a large sample of breast screening mammograms by analysing the relationship of the presence and size of prompts to the recall decision. METHODS: Local researc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2575546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18724867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2137 |
_version_ | 1782160327258931200 |
---|---|
author | Gilbert, Fiona J Astley, Susan M Boggis, Caroline RM McGee, Magnus A Griffiths, Pamela M Duffy, Stephen W Agbaje, Olorunsola F Gillan, Maureen GC Wilson, Mary Jain, Anil K Barr, Nicola Beetles, Ursula M Griffiths, Miriam A Johnson, Jill Roberts, Rita M Deans, Heather E Duncan, Karen A Iyengar, Geeta |
author_facet | Gilbert, Fiona J Astley, Susan M Boggis, Caroline RM McGee, Magnus A Griffiths, Pamela M Duffy, Stephen W Agbaje, Olorunsola F Gillan, Maureen GC Wilson, Mary Jain, Anil K Barr, Nicola Beetles, Ursula M Griffiths, Miriam A Johnson, Jill Roberts, Rita M Deans, Heather E Duncan, Karen A Iyengar, Geeta |
author_sort | Gilbert, Fiona J |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompts on reader behaviour in a large sample of breast screening mammograms by analysing the relationship of the presence and size of prompts to the recall decision. METHODS: Local research ethics committee approval was obtained; informed consent was not required. Mammograms were obtained from women attending routine mammography at two breast screening centres in 1996. Films, previously double read, were re-read by a different reader using CAD. The study material included 315 cancer cases comprising all screen-detected cancer cases, all subsequent interval cancers and 861 normal cases randomly selected from 10,267 cases. Ground truth data were used to assess the efficacy of CAD prompting. Associations between prompt attributes and tumour features or reader recall decisions were assessed by chi-squared tests. RESULTS: There was a highly significant relationship between prompting and a decision to recall for cancer cases and for a random sample of normal cases (P < 0.001). Sixty-four per cent of all cases contained at least one CAD prompt. In cancer cases, larger prompts were more likely to be recalled (P = 0.02) for masses but there was no such association for calcifications (P = 0.9). In a random sample of 861 normal cases, larger prompts were more likely to be recalled (P = 0.02) for both mass and calcification prompts. Significant associations were observed with prompting and breast density (p = 0.009) for cancer cases but not for normal cases (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For both normal cases and cancer cases, prompted mammograms were more likely to be recalled and the prompt size was also associated with a recall decision. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2575546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25755462008-10-30 Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions Gilbert, Fiona J Astley, Susan M Boggis, Caroline RM McGee, Magnus A Griffiths, Pamela M Duffy, Stephen W Agbaje, Olorunsola F Gillan, Maureen GC Wilson, Mary Jain, Anil K Barr, Nicola Beetles, Ursula M Griffiths, Miriam A Johnson, Jill Roberts, Rita M Deans, Heather E Duncan, Karen A Iyengar, Geeta Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompts on reader behaviour in a large sample of breast screening mammograms by analysing the relationship of the presence and size of prompts to the recall decision. METHODS: Local research ethics committee approval was obtained; informed consent was not required. Mammograms were obtained from women attending routine mammography at two breast screening centres in 1996. Films, previously double read, were re-read by a different reader using CAD. The study material included 315 cancer cases comprising all screen-detected cancer cases, all subsequent interval cancers and 861 normal cases randomly selected from 10,267 cases. Ground truth data were used to assess the efficacy of CAD prompting. Associations between prompt attributes and tumour features or reader recall decisions were assessed by chi-squared tests. RESULTS: There was a highly significant relationship between prompting and a decision to recall for cancer cases and for a random sample of normal cases (P < 0.001). Sixty-four per cent of all cases contained at least one CAD prompt. In cancer cases, larger prompts were more likely to be recalled (P = 0.02) for masses but there was no such association for calcifications (P = 0.9). In a random sample of 861 normal cases, larger prompts were more likely to be recalled (P = 0.02) for both mass and calcification prompts. Significant associations were observed with prompting and breast density (p = 0.009) for cancer cases but not for normal cases (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For both normal cases and cancer cases, prompted mammograms were more likely to be recalled and the prompt size was also associated with a recall decision. BioMed Central 2008 2008-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2575546/ /pubmed/18724867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2137 Text en Copyright © 2008 Gilbert et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gilbert, Fiona J Astley, Susan M Boggis, Caroline RM McGee, Magnus A Griffiths, Pamela M Duffy, Stephen W Agbaje, Olorunsola F Gillan, Maureen GC Wilson, Mary Jain, Anil K Barr, Nicola Beetles, Ursula M Griffiths, Miriam A Johnson, Jill Roberts, Rita M Deans, Heather E Duncan, Karen A Iyengar, Geeta Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions |
title | Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions |
title_full | Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions |
title_fullStr | Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions |
title_full_unstemmed | Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions |
title_short | Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions |
title_sort | variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2575546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18724867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilbertfionaj variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT astleysusanm variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT boggiscarolinerm variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT mcgeemagnusa variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT griffithspamelam variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT duffystephenw variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT agbajeolorunsolaf variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT gillanmaureengc variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT wilsonmary variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT jainanilk variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT barrnicola variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT beetlesursulam variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT griffithsmiriama variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT johnsonjill variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT robertsritam variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT deansheathere variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT duncankarena variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions AT iyengargeeta variablesizecomputeraideddetectionpromptsandmammographyfilmreaderdecisions |