Cargando…

Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit

INTRODUCTION: In blunt trauma, comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score 3 to 8) with a negative comprehensive cervical spine (CS) computed tomography assessment and no apparent spinal deficit, CS clearance strategies (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and prolonged cervical collar use) are controv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunham, C Michael, Brocker, Brian P, Collier, B David, Gemmel, David J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2575569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18625041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6957
_version_ 1782160332660146176
author Dunham, C Michael
Brocker, Brian P
Collier, B David
Gemmel, David J
author_facet Dunham, C Michael
Brocker, Brian P
Collier, B David
Gemmel, David J
author_sort Dunham, C Michael
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In blunt trauma, comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score 3 to 8) with a negative comprehensive cervical spine (CS) computed tomography assessment and no apparent spinal deficit, CS clearance strategies (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and prolonged cervical collar use) are controversial. METHODS: We conducted a literature review to delineate risks for coma, CS instability, prolonged cervical collar use, and CS MRI. RESULTS: Based on our search of the literature, the numbers of functional survivor patients among those who had sustained blunt trauma were as follows: 350 per 1,000 comatose unstable patients (increased intracranial pressure [ICP], hypotension, hypoxia, or early ventilator-associated pneumonia); 150 per 1,000 comatose high-risk patients (age > 45 years or Glasgow Coma Scale score 3 to 5); and 600 per 1,000 comatose stable patients (not unstable or high risk). Risk probabilities for adverse events among unstable, high-risk, and stable patients were as follows: 2.5% for CS instability; 26.2% for increased intensive care unit complications with prolonged cervical collar use; 9.3% to 14.6% for secondary brain injury with MRI transportation; and 20.6% for aspiration during MRI scanning (supine position). Additional risk probabilities for adverse events among unstable patients were as follows: 35.8% for increased ICP with cervical collar; and 72.1% for increased ICP during MRI scan (supine position). CONCLUSION: Blunt trauma coma functional survivor (independent living) rates are alarming. When a comprehensive CS computed tomography evaluation is negative and there is no apparent spinal deficit, CS instability is unlikely (2.5%). Secondary brain injury from the cervical collar or MRI is more probable than CS instability and jeopardizes cerebral recovery. Brain injury severity, probability of CS instability, cervical collar risk, and MRI risk assessments are essential when deciding whether CS MRI is appropriate and for determining the timing of cervical collar removal.
format Text
id pubmed-2575569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25755692008-10-30 Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit Dunham, C Michael Brocker, Brian P Collier, B David Gemmel, David J Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: In blunt trauma, comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score 3 to 8) with a negative comprehensive cervical spine (CS) computed tomography assessment and no apparent spinal deficit, CS clearance strategies (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and prolonged cervical collar use) are controversial. METHODS: We conducted a literature review to delineate risks for coma, CS instability, prolonged cervical collar use, and CS MRI. RESULTS: Based on our search of the literature, the numbers of functional survivor patients among those who had sustained blunt trauma were as follows: 350 per 1,000 comatose unstable patients (increased intracranial pressure [ICP], hypotension, hypoxia, or early ventilator-associated pneumonia); 150 per 1,000 comatose high-risk patients (age > 45 years or Glasgow Coma Scale score 3 to 5); and 600 per 1,000 comatose stable patients (not unstable or high risk). Risk probabilities for adverse events among unstable, high-risk, and stable patients were as follows: 2.5% for CS instability; 26.2% for increased intensive care unit complications with prolonged cervical collar use; 9.3% to 14.6% for secondary brain injury with MRI transportation; and 20.6% for aspiration during MRI scanning (supine position). Additional risk probabilities for adverse events among unstable patients were as follows: 35.8% for increased ICP with cervical collar; and 72.1% for increased ICP during MRI scan (supine position). CONCLUSION: Blunt trauma coma functional survivor (independent living) rates are alarming. When a comprehensive CS computed tomography evaluation is negative and there is no apparent spinal deficit, CS instability is unlikely (2.5%). Secondary brain injury from the cervical collar or MRI is more probable than CS instability and jeopardizes cerebral recovery. Brain injury severity, probability of CS instability, cervical collar risk, and MRI risk assessments are essential when deciding whether CS MRI is appropriate and for determining the timing of cervical collar removal. BioMed Central 2008 2008-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2575569/ /pubmed/18625041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6957 Text en Copyright © 2008 Dunham et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Dunham, C Michael
Brocker, Brian P
Collier, B David
Gemmel, David J
Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit
title Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit
title_full Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit
title_fullStr Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit
title_full_unstemmed Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit
title_short Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit
title_sort risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2575569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18625041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6957
work_keys_str_mv AT dunhamcmichael risksassociatedwithmagneticresonanceimagingandcervicalcollarincomatoseblunttraumapatientswithnegativecomprehensivecervicalspinecomputedtomographyandnoapparentspinaldeficit
AT brockerbrianp risksassociatedwithmagneticresonanceimagingandcervicalcollarincomatoseblunttraumapatientswithnegativecomprehensivecervicalspinecomputedtomographyandnoapparentspinaldeficit
AT collierbdavid risksassociatedwithmagneticresonanceimagingandcervicalcollarincomatoseblunttraumapatientswithnegativecomprehensivecervicalspinecomputedtomographyandnoapparentspinaldeficit
AT gemmeldavidj risksassociatedwithmagneticresonanceimagingandcervicalcollarincomatoseblunttraumapatientswithnegativecomprehensivecervicalspinecomputedtomographyandnoapparentspinaldeficit