Cargando…

Artemisinin derivatives versus quinine in treating severe malaria in children: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of intravenous quinine, which is the mainstay for treating severe malaria in children, is decreasing in South East Asia and Africa. Artemisinin derivatives are a potential alternative to quinine. However, their efficacy compared to quinine in treating severe malaria in child...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: PrayGod, George, de Frey, Albie, Eisenhut, Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2576341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18928535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-210
_version_ 1782160388278714368
author PrayGod, George
de Frey, Albie
Eisenhut, Michael
author_facet PrayGod, George
de Frey, Albie
Eisenhut, Michael
author_sort PrayGod, George
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy of intravenous quinine, which is the mainstay for treating severe malaria in children, is decreasing in South East Asia and Africa. Artemisinin derivatives are a potential alternative to quinine. However, their efficacy compared to quinine in treating severe malaria in children is not clearly understood. The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of parenteral artemisinin derivatives versus parenteral quinine in treating severe malaria in children. METHODS: All randomized controlled studies comparing parenteral artemisinin derivatives with parenteral quinine in treating severe malaria in children were included in the review. Data bases searched were: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2008), EMBASE (1980 to February 2008), and LILACS (1982 to February 2008). Dichotomous variables were compared using risk ratios (RR) and the continuous data using weighted mean difference (WMD). RESULTS: Twelve trials were included (1,524 subjects). There was no difference in mortality between artemisinin derivatives and quinine (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.12). The artemisinin derivatives resolved coma faster than quinine (WMD = -4.61, 95% CI: -7.21 to -2.00, fixed effect model), but when trials with adequate concealment only were considered this differences disappeared. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in parasite clearance time, fever clearance time, incidence of neurological sequelae and 28(th )day cure rate. One trial reported significantly more local reactions at the injection site with intramuscular quinine compared to artemether. None of the trials was adequately powered to demonstrate equivalence. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence that treatment of children with severe malaria with parenteral artemisinin derivatives was associated with lower mortality or long-term morbidity compared to parenteral quinine. Future studies require adequately powered equivalence trial design to decide whether both drugs are equally effective.
format Text
id pubmed-2576341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25763412008-10-31 Artemisinin derivatives versus quinine in treating severe malaria in children: a systematic review PrayGod, George de Frey, Albie Eisenhut, Michael Malar J Research BACKGROUND: The efficacy of intravenous quinine, which is the mainstay for treating severe malaria in children, is decreasing in South East Asia and Africa. Artemisinin derivatives are a potential alternative to quinine. However, their efficacy compared to quinine in treating severe malaria in children is not clearly understood. The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of parenteral artemisinin derivatives versus parenteral quinine in treating severe malaria in children. METHODS: All randomized controlled studies comparing parenteral artemisinin derivatives with parenteral quinine in treating severe malaria in children were included in the review. Data bases searched were: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2008), EMBASE (1980 to February 2008), and LILACS (1982 to February 2008). Dichotomous variables were compared using risk ratios (RR) and the continuous data using weighted mean difference (WMD). RESULTS: Twelve trials were included (1,524 subjects). There was no difference in mortality between artemisinin derivatives and quinine (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.12). The artemisinin derivatives resolved coma faster than quinine (WMD = -4.61, 95% CI: -7.21 to -2.00, fixed effect model), but when trials with adequate concealment only were considered this differences disappeared. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in parasite clearance time, fever clearance time, incidence of neurological sequelae and 28(th )day cure rate. One trial reported significantly more local reactions at the injection site with intramuscular quinine compared to artemether. None of the trials was adequately powered to demonstrate equivalence. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence that treatment of children with severe malaria with parenteral artemisinin derivatives was associated with lower mortality or long-term morbidity compared to parenteral quinine. Future studies require adequately powered equivalence trial design to decide whether both drugs are equally effective. BioMed Central 2008-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2576341/ /pubmed/18928535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-210 Text en Copyright © 2008 PrayGod et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
PrayGod, George
de Frey, Albie
Eisenhut, Michael
Artemisinin derivatives versus quinine in treating severe malaria in children: a systematic review
title Artemisinin derivatives versus quinine in treating severe malaria in children: a systematic review
title_full Artemisinin derivatives versus quinine in treating severe malaria in children: a systematic review
title_fullStr Artemisinin derivatives versus quinine in treating severe malaria in children: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Artemisinin derivatives versus quinine in treating severe malaria in children: a systematic review
title_short Artemisinin derivatives versus quinine in treating severe malaria in children: a systematic review
title_sort artemisinin derivatives versus quinine in treating severe malaria in children: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2576341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18928535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-210
work_keys_str_mv AT praygodgeorge artemisininderivativesversusquinineintreatingseveremalariainchildrenasystematicreview
AT defreyalbie artemisininderivativesversusquinineintreatingseveremalariainchildrenasystematicreview
AT eisenhutmichael artemisininderivativesversusquinineintreatingseveremalariainchildrenasystematicreview