Cargando…

Reconciling Predictive Coding and Biased Competition Models of Cortical Function

A simple variation of the standard biased competition model is shown, via some trivial mathematical manipulations, to be identical to predictive coding. Specifically, it is shown that a particular implementation of the biased competition model, in which nodes compete via inhibition that targets the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Spratling, Michael W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2576514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18978957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.10.004.2008
_version_ 1782160401108041728
author Spratling, Michael W.
author_facet Spratling, Michael W.
author_sort Spratling, Michael W.
collection PubMed
description A simple variation of the standard biased competition model is shown, via some trivial mathematical manipulations, to be identical to predictive coding. Specifically, it is shown that a particular implementation of the biased competition model, in which nodes compete via inhibition that targets the inputs to a cortical region, is mathematically equivalent to the linear predictive coding model. This observation demonstrates that these two important and influential rival theories of cortical function are minor variations on the same underlying mathematical model.
format Text
id pubmed-2576514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25765142008-10-31 Reconciling Predictive Coding and Biased Competition Models of Cortical Function Spratling, Michael W. Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience A simple variation of the standard biased competition model is shown, via some trivial mathematical manipulations, to be identical to predictive coding. Specifically, it is shown that a particular implementation of the biased competition model, in which nodes compete via inhibition that targets the inputs to a cortical region, is mathematically equivalent to the linear predictive coding model. This observation demonstrates that these two important and influential rival theories of cortical function are minor variations on the same underlying mathematical model. Frontiers Research Foundation 2008-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2576514/ /pubmed/18978957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.10.004.2008 Text en Copyright © 2008 Spratling. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Spratling, Michael W.
Reconciling Predictive Coding and Biased Competition Models of Cortical Function
title Reconciling Predictive Coding and Biased Competition Models of Cortical Function
title_full Reconciling Predictive Coding and Biased Competition Models of Cortical Function
title_fullStr Reconciling Predictive Coding and Biased Competition Models of Cortical Function
title_full_unstemmed Reconciling Predictive Coding and Biased Competition Models of Cortical Function
title_short Reconciling Predictive Coding and Biased Competition Models of Cortical Function
title_sort reconciling predictive coding and biased competition models of cortical function
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2576514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18978957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.10.004.2008
work_keys_str_mv AT spratlingmichaelw reconcilingpredictivecodingandbiasedcompetitionmodelsofcorticalfunction