Cargando…

Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Cochrane reviews are regarded as being scientifically rigorous and are increasingly used by a variety of stakeholders. However, factors predicting the publication of Cochrane reviews have never been reported. This is important because if a higher proportion of Cochrane protocols with cer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tricco, Andrea C., Brehaut, Jamie, Chen, Maggie H., Moher, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2577297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18997866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003684
_version_ 1782160475978465280
author Tricco, Andrea C.
Brehaut, Jamie
Chen, Maggie H.
Moher, David
author_facet Tricco, Andrea C.
Brehaut, Jamie
Chen, Maggie H.
Moher, David
author_sort Tricco, Andrea C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cochrane reviews are regarded as being scientifically rigorous and are increasingly used by a variety of stakeholders. However, factors predicting the publication of Cochrane reviews have never been reported. This is important because if a higher proportion of Cochrane protocols with certain characteristics (e.g., funding) are being published, this may lead to inaccurate decisions. We examined the frequency of published and unpublished Cochrane reviews and protocol factors that predict the publication of Cochrane reviews. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Retrospective cohort study of Cochrane protocols published in 2000 (Issues 2 to 4) and 2001 (Issue 1). The publication status of these reviews was followed up to Issue 1, 2008 in The Cochrane Library. Survival analysis of the time from protocol publication to the first review publication and protocol factors predicting the time to publication was conducted. There were 411 new Cochrane protocols in the cohort. After excluding 39; 71/372 (19.1%) were unpublished and 301/372 (80.9%) were published as full Cochrane reviews at the time of study analysis (January 2008). The median time to publication was 2.4 years (range: 0.15 to 8.96). Multivariate analyses revealed that shorter time to publication was associated with the review subsequently being updated (hazard ratio, HR: 1.80 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.39 to 2.33 years]) and longer time to publication was associated with the review having two published protocols, indicating changes to the review plan (HR: 0.33 [95% CI: 0.12 to 0.90 years]). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Only about 80% Cochrane protocols were published as full reviews after over 8 years of follow-up. The median time to publication was 2.4 years and some reviews took much longer. Strategies to decrease time to publication should be considered, such as streamlining the review process, increased support for authors when protocol amendments occur, and better infrastructure for updating Cochrane reviews.
format Text
id pubmed-2577297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25772972008-11-10 Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study Tricco, Andrea C. Brehaut, Jamie Chen, Maggie H. Moher, David PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cochrane reviews are regarded as being scientifically rigorous and are increasingly used by a variety of stakeholders. However, factors predicting the publication of Cochrane reviews have never been reported. This is important because if a higher proportion of Cochrane protocols with certain characteristics (e.g., funding) are being published, this may lead to inaccurate decisions. We examined the frequency of published and unpublished Cochrane reviews and protocol factors that predict the publication of Cochrane reviews. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Retrospective cohort study of Cochrane protocols published in 2000 (Issues 2 to 4) and 2001 (Issue 1). The publication status of these reviews was followed up to Issue 1, 2008 in The Cochrane Library. Survival analysis of the time from protocol publication to the first review publication and protocol factors predicting the time to publication was conducted. There were 411 new Cochrane protocols in the cohort. After excluding 39; 71/372 (19.1%) were unpublished and 301/372 (80.9%) were published as full Cochrane reviews at the time of study analysis (January 2008). The median time to publication was 2.4 years (range: 0.15 to 8.96). Multivariate analyses revealed that shorter time to publication was associated with the review subsequently being updated (hazard ratio, HR: 1.80 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.39 to 2.33 years]) and longer time to publication was associated with the review having two published protocols, indicating changes to the review plan (HR: 0.33 [95% CI: 0.12 to 0.90 years]). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Only about 80% Cochrane protocols were published as full reviews after over 8 years of follow-up. The median time to publication was 2.4 years and some reviews took much longer. Strategies to decrease time to publication should be considered, such as streamlining the review process, increased support for authors when protocol amendments occur, and better infrastructure for updating Cochrane reviews. Public Library of Science 2008-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2577297/ /pubmed/18997866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003684 Text en Tricco et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tricco, Andrea C.
Brehaut, Jamie
Chen, Maggie H.
Moher, David
Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort following 411 cochrane protocols to completion: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2577297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18997866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003684
work_keys_str_mv AT triccoandreac following411cochraneprotocolstocompletionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT brehautjamie following411cochraneprotocolstocompletionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenmaggieh following411cochraneprotocolstocompletionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT moherdavid following411cochraneprotocolstocompletionaretrospectivecohortstudy