Cargando…
Impact of non-homologous end-joining deficiency on random and targeted DNA integration: implications for gene targeting
In higher animal cells, the principal limitation of gene-targeting technology is the extremely low efficiency of targeted integration, which occurs three to four orders of magnitude less frequently than random integration. Assuming that random integration mechanistically involves non-homologous end-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2577324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18835848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn649 |
_version_ | 1782160478373412864 |
---|---|
author | Iiizumi, Susumu Kurosawa, Aya So, Sairei Ishii, Yasuyuki Chikaraishi, Yuichi Ishii, Ayako Koyama, Hideki Adachi, Noritaka |
author_facet | Iiizumi, Susumu Kurosawa, Aya So, Sairei Ishii, Yasuyuki Chikaraishi, Yuichi Ishii, Ayako Koyama, Hideki Adachi, Noritaka |
author_sort | Iiizumi, Susumu |
collection | PubMed |
description | In higher animal cells, the principal limitation of gene-targeting technology is the extremely low efficiency of targeted integration, which occurs three to four orders of magnitude less frequently than random integration. Assuming that random integration mechanistically involves non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), inactivation of this pathway should reduce random integration and may enhance gene targeting. To test this possibility, we examined the frequencies of random and targeted integration in NHEJ-deficient chicken DT40 and human Nalm-6 cell lines. As expected, loss of NHEJ resulted in drastically reduced random integration in DT40 cells. Unexpectedly, however, this was not the case for Nalm-6 cells, indicating that NHEJ is not the sole mechanism of random integration. Nevertheless, we present evidence that NHEJ inactivation can lead to enhanced gene targeting through a reduction of random integration and/or an increase in targeted integration by homologous recombination. Most intriguingly, our results show that, in the absence of functional NHEJ, random integration of targeting vectors occurs more frequently than non-targeting vectors (harboring no or little homology to the host genome), implying that suppression of NHEJ-independent random integration events is needed to greatly enhance gene targeting in animal cells. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2577324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25773242008-11-03 Impact of non-homologous end-joining deficiency on random and targeted DNA integration: implications for gene targeting Iiizumi, Susumu Kurosawa, Aya So, Sairei Ishii, Yasuyuki Chikaraishi, Yuichi Ishii, Ayako Koyama, Hideki Adachi, Noritaka Nucleic Acids Res Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication In higher animal cells, the principal limitation of gene-targeting technology is the extremely low efficiency of targeted integration, which occurs three to four orders of magnitude less frequently than random integration. Assuming that random integration mechanistically involves non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), inactivation of this pathway should reduce random integration and may enhance gene targeting. To test this possibility, we examined the frequencies of random and targeted integration in NHEJ-deficient chicken DT40 and human Nalm-6 cell lines. As expected, loss of NHEJ resulted in drastically reduced random integration in DT40 cells. Unexpectedly, however, this was not the case for Nalm-6 cells, indicating that NHEJ is not the sole mechanism of random integration. Nevertheless, we present evidence that NHEJ inactivation can lead to enhanced gene targeting through a reduction of random integration and/or an increase in targeted integration by homologous recombination. Most intriguingly, our results show that, in the absence of functional NHEJ, random integration of targeting vectors occurs more frequently than non-targeting vectors (harboring no or little homology to the host genome), implying that suppression of NHEJ-independent random integration events is needed to greatly enhance gene targeting in animal cells. Oxford University Press 2008-11 2008-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2577324/ /pubmed/18835848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn649 Text en © 2008 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication Iiizumi, Susumu Kurosawa, Aya So, Sairei Ishii, Yasuyuki Chikaraishi, Yuichi Ishii, Ayako Koyama, Hideki Adachi, Noritaka Impact of non-homologous end-joining deficiency on random and targeted DNA integration: implications for gene targeting |
title | Impact of non-homologous end-joining deficiency on random and targeted DNA integration: implications for gene targeting |
title_full | Impact of non-homologous end-joining deficiency on random and targeted DNA integration: implications for gene targeting |
title_fullStr | Impact of non-homologous end-joining deficiency on random and targeted DNA integration: implications for gene targeting |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of non-homologous end-joining deficiency on random and targeted DNA integration: implications for gene targeting |
title_short | Impact of non-homologous end-joining deficiency on random and targeted DNA integration: implications for gene targeting |
title_sort | impact of non-homologous end-joining deficiency on random and targeted dna integration: implications for gene targeting |
topic | Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2577324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18835848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn649 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iiizumisusumu impactofnonhomologousendjoiningdeficiencyonrandomandtargeteddnaintegrationimplicationsforgenetargeting AT kurosawaaya impactofnonhomologousendjoiningdeficiencyonrandomandtargeteddnaintegrationimplicationsforgenetargeting AT sosairei impactofnonhomologousendjoiningdeficiencyonrandomandtargeteddnaintegrationimplicationsforgenetargeting AT ishiiyasuyuki impactofnonhomologousendjoiningdeficiencyonrandomandtargeteddnaintegrationimplicationsforgenetargeting AT chikaraishiyuichi impactofnonhomologousendjoiningdeficiencyonrandomandtargeteddnaintegrationimplicationsforgenetargeting AT ishiiayako impactofnonhomologousendjoiningdeficiencyonrandomandtargeteddnaintegrationimplicationsforgenetargeting AT koyamahideki impactofnonhomologousendjoiningdeficiencyonrandomandtargeteddnaintegrationimplicationsforgenetargeting AT adachinoritaka impactofnonhomologousendjoiningdeficiencyonrandomandtargeteddnaintegrationimplicationsforgenetargeting |