Cargando…
Enforcement of State Indoor Tanning Laws in the United States
INTRODUCTION: Twenty-eight US states have passed legislation for indoor tanning facilities. To our knowledge, whether these state laws are actually enforced has not been evaluated previously in all 28 states. Therefore, we interviewed key informants in these states to assess enforcement practices. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2578791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18793513 |
_version_ | 1782160528577134592 |
---|---|
author | Mayer, Joni A Hoerster, Katherine D Pichon, Latrice C Rubio, Debra A Woodruff, Susan I Forster, Jean L |
author_facet | Mayer, Joni A Hoerster, Katherine D Pichon, Latrice C Rubio, Debra A Woodruff, Susan I Forster, Jean L |
author_sort | Mayer, Joni A |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Twenty-eight US states have passed legislation for indoor tanning facilities. To our knowledge, whether these state laws are actually enforced has not been evaluated previously in all 28 states. Therefore, we interviewed key informants in these states to assess enforcement practices. METHODS: Two trained interviewers used a structured survey instrument to interview 28 key informants who were knowledgeable about enforcement practices for laws regarding indoor tanning. Respondents provided information specific to the most populous city in their states. RESULTS: Licensure for indoor tanning businesses was required in 22 of the 28 cities. Slightly less than half of the cities gave citations to tanning facilities that violated state law. Approximately 32% of the cities did not inspect indoor tanning facilities for compliance with state law, and another 32% conducted inspections less than annually. Of those cities that inspected at all, most conducted unannounced inspections. CONCLUSION: The relatively low rates of annual inspections and citations are of concern. We recommend that future studies assess whether legislation, enforcement practices, or a combination of the 2 affects the practices of indoor tanning facilities or of consumers. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2578791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25787912008-11-13 Enforcement of State Indoor Tanning Laws in the United States Mayer, Joni A Hoerster, Katherine D Pichon, Latrice C Rubio, Debra A Woodruff, Susan I Forster, Jean L Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Twenty-eight US states have passed legislation for indoor tanning facilities. To our knowledge, whether these state laws are actually enforced has not been evaluated previously in all 28 states. Therefore, we interviewed key informants in these states to assess enforcement practices. METHODS: Two trained interviewers used a structured survey instrument to interview 28 key informants who were knowledgeable about enforcement practices for laws regarding indoor tanning. Respondents provided information specific to the most populous city in their states. RESULTS: Licensure for indoor tanning businesses was required in 22 of the 28 cities. Slightly less than half of the cities gave citations to tanning facilities that violated state law. Approximately 32% of the cities did not inspect indoor tanning facilities for compliance with state law, and another 32% conducted inspections less than annually. Of those cities that inspected at all, most conducted unannounced inspections. CONCLUSION: The relatively low rates of annual inspections and citations are of concern. We recommend that future studies assess whether legislation, enforcement practices, or a combination of the 2 affects the practices of indoor tanning facilities or of consumers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2578791/ /pubmed/18793513 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mayer, Joni A Hoerster, Katherine D Pichon, Latrice C Rubio, Debra A Woodruff, Susan I Forster, Jean L Enforcement of State Indoor Tanning Laws in the United States |
title | Enforcement of State Indoor Tanning Laws in the United States |
title_full | Enforcement of State Indoor Tanning Laws in the United States |
title_fullStr | Enforcement of State Indoor Tanning Laws in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Enforcement of State Indoor Tanning Laws in the United States |
title_short | Enforcement of State Indoor Tanning Laws in the United States |
title_sort | enforcement of state indoor tanning laws in the united states |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2578791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18793513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayerjonia enforcementofstateindoortanninglawsintheunitedstates AT hoersterkatherined enforcementofstateindoortanninglawsintheunitedstates AT pichonlatricec enforcementofstateindoortanninglawsintheunitedstates AT rubiodebraa enforcementofstateindoortanninglawsintheunitedstates AT woodruffsusani enforcementofstateindoortanninglawsintheunitedstates AT forsterjeanl enforcementofstateindoortanninglawsintheunitedstates |