Cargando…

Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological Puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients

BACKGROUND: Totally Implantable Access Ports (TIAP) are being extensively used world-wide and can be expected to gain further importance with the introduction of new neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments in oncology. Two different techniques for the implantation can be selected: A direct puncture of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knebel, Philip, Fischer, Lars, Cremonese, Eva, Lopez-Benitez, Ruben, Stampfl, Ulrike, Radeleff, Boris, Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich, Büchler, Markus W, Seiler, Christoph M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2579421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18950491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-60
_version_ 1782160572422291456
author Knebel, Philip
Fischer, Lars
Cremonese, Eva
Lopez-Benitez, Ruben
Stampfl, Ulrike
Radeleff, Boris
Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
Büchler, Markus W
Seiler, Christoph M
author_facet Knebel, Philip
Fischer, Lars
Cremonese, Eva
Lopez-Benitez, Ruben
Stampfl, Ulrike
Radeleff, Boris
Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
Büchler, Markus W
Seiler, Christoph M
author_sort Knebel, Philip
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Totally Implantable Access Ports (TIAP) are being extensively used world-wide and can be expected to gain further importance with the introduction of new neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments in oncology. Two different techniques for the implantation can be selected: A direct puncture of a central vein and the utilization of a Seldinger device or the surgical Venae sectio. It is still unclear which technique has the optimal benefit/risk ratio for the patient. DESIGN: A single-center, expertise based randomized, controlled superiority trial to compare two different TIAP implantation techniques. 100 patients will be included and randomized pre-operatively. All patients aged 18 years or older scheduled for primary elective implantation of a TIAP under local anesthesia who signed the informed consent will be included. The primary endpoint is the primary success rate of the randomized technique. Control Intervention: Venae Sectio will be employed to insert a TIAP by a surgeon; Experimental intervention: Punction of V. Subclavia will be used to place a TIAP by a radiologist. Duration of study: Approximately 10 months, follow up time: 90 days. ORGANISATION/RESPONSIBILITY: The PORTAS 2 – Trial will be conducted in accordance with the protocol and in compliance with the moral, ethical, and scientific principles governing clinical research as set out in the Declaration of Helsinki (1989) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The Center of Clinical Trials at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg is responsible for design and conduct of the trial including randomization and documentation of patients' data. Data management and statistical analysis will be performed by the independent Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), University of Heidelberg. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00600444).
format Text
id pubmed-2579421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25794212008-11-06 Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological Puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients Knebel, Philip Fischer, Lars Cremonese, Eva Lopez-Benitez, Ruben Stampfl, Ulrike Radeleff, Boris Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich Büchler, Markus W Seiler, Christoph M Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Totally Implantable Access Ports (TIAP) are being extensively used world-wide and can be expected to gain further importance with the introduction of new neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments in oncology. Two different techniques for the implantation can be selected: A direct puncture of a central vein and the utilization of a Seldinger device or the surgical Venae sectio. It is still unclear which technique has the optimal benefit/risk ratio for the patient. DESIGN: A single-center, expertise based randomized, controlled superiority trial to compare two different TIAP implantation techniques. 100 patients will be included and randomized pre-operatively. All patients aged 18 years or older scheduled for primary elective implantation of a TIAP under local anesthesia who signed the informed consent will be included. The primary endpoint is the primary success rate of the randomized technique. Control Intervention: Venae Sectio will be employed to insert a TIAP by a surgeon; Experimental intervention: Punction of V. Subclavia will be used to place a TIAP by a radiologist. Duration of study: Approximately 10 months, follow up time: 90 days. ORGANISATION/RESPONSIBILITY: The PORTAS 2 – Trial will be conducted in accordance with the protocol and in compliance with the moral, ethical, and scientific principles governing clinical research as set out in the Declaration of Helsinki (1989) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The Center of Clinical Trials at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg is responsible for design and conduct of the trial including randomization and documentation of patients' data. Data management and statistical analysis will be performed by the independent Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), University of Heidelberg. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00600444). BioMed Central 2008-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2579421/ /pubmed/18950491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-60 Text en Copyright © 2008 Knebel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Knebel, Philip
Fischer, Lars
Cremonese, Eva
Lopez-Benitez, Ruben
Stampfl, Ulrike
Radeleff, Boris
Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
Büchler, Markus W
Seiler, Christoph M
Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological Puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients
title Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological Puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients
title_full Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological Puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients
title_fullStr Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological Puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients
title_full_unstemmed Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological Puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients
title_short Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological Puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients
title_sort protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical venae sectio versus radiological puncture of vena subclavia for insertion of totally implantable access port in oncological patients
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2579421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18950491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-60
work_keys_str_mv AT knebelphilip protocolofanexpertisebasedrandomizedtrialcomparingsurgicalvenaesectioversusradiologicalpunctureofvenasubclaviaforinsertionoftotallyimplantableaccessportinoncologicalpatients
AT fischerlars protocolofanexpertisebasedrandomizedtrialcomparingsurgicalvenaesectioversusradiologicalpunctureofvenasubclaviaforinsertionoftotallyimplantableaccessportinoncologicalpatients
AT cremoneseeva protocolofanexpertisebasedrandomizedtrialcomparingsurgicalvenaesectioversusradiologicalpunctureofvenasubclaviaforinsertionoftotallyimplantableaccessportinoncologicalpatients
AT lopezbenitezruben protocolofanexpertisebasedrandomizedtrialcomparingsurgicalvenaesectioversusradiologicalpunctureofvenasubclaviaforinsertionoftotallyimplantableaccessportinoncologicalpatients
AT stampflulrike protocolofanexpertisebasedrandomizedtrialcomparingsurgicalvenaesectioversusradiologicalpunctureofvenasubclaviaforinsertionoftotallyimplantableaccessportinoncologicalpatients
AT radeleffboris protocolofanexpertisebasedrandomizedtrialcomparingsurgicalvenaesectioversusradiologicalpunctureofvenasubclaviaforinsertionoftotallyimplantableaccessportinoncologicalpatients
AT kauczorhansulrich protocolofanexpertisebasedrandomizedtrialcomparingsurgicalvenaesectioversusradiologicalpunctureofvenasubclaviaforinsertionoftotallyimplantableaccessportinoncologicalpatients
AT buchlermarkusw protocolofanexpertisebasedrandomizedtrialcomparingsurgicalvenaesectioversusradiologicalpunctureofvenasubclaviaforinsertionoftotallyimplantableaccessportinoncologicalpatients
AT seilerchristophm protocolofanexpertisebasedrandomizedtrialcomparingsurgicalvenaesectioversusradiologicalpunctureofvenasubclaviaforinsertionoftotallyimplantableaccessportinoncologicalpatients