Cargando…

DNA damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment

The extraction of genetic information from preserved tissue samples or museum specimens is a fundamental component of many fields of research, including the Barcode of Life initiative, forensic investigations, biological studies using scat sample analysis, and cancer research utilizing formaldehyde-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmermann, Juergen, Hajibabaei, Mehrdad, Blackburn, David C, Hanken, James, Cantin, Elizabeth, Posfai, Janos, Evans, Thomas C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2579423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18947416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-5-18
_version_ 1782160572906733568
author Zimmermann, Juergen
Hajibabaei, Mehrdad
Blackburn, David C
Hanken, James
Cantin, Elizabeth
Posfai, Janos
Evans, Thomas C
author_facet Zimmermann, Juergen
Hajibabaei, Mehrdad
Blackburn, David C
Hanken, James
Cantin, Elizabeth
Posfai, Janos
Evans, Thomas C
author_sort Zimmermann, Juergen
collection PubMed
description The extraction of genetic information from preserved tissue samples or museum specimens is a fundamental component of many fields of research, including the Barcode of Life initiative, forensic investigations, biological studies using scat sample analysis, and cancer research utilizing formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Efforts to obtain genetic information from these sources are often hampered by an inability to amplify the desired DNA as a consequence of DNA damage. Previous studies have described techniques for improved DNA extraction from such samples or focused on the effect of damaging agents – such as light, oxygen or formaldehyde – on free nucleotides. We present ongoing work to characterize lesions in DNA samples extracted from preserved specimens. The extracted DNA is digested to single nucleosides with a combination of DNase I, Snake Venom Phosphodiesterase, and Antarctic Phosphatase and then analyzed by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS. We present data for moth specimens that were preserved dried and pinned with no additional preservative and for frog tissue samples that were preserved in either ethanol, or formaldehyde, or fixed in formaldehyde and then preserved in ethanol. These preservation methods represent the most common methods of preserving animal specimens in museum collections. We observe changes in the nucleoside content of these samples over time, especially a loss of deoxyguanosine. We characterize the fragmentation state of the DNA and aim to identify abundant nucleoside lesions. Finally, simple models are introduced to describe the DNA fragmentation based on nicks and double-strand breaks.
format Text
id pubmed-2579423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25794232008-11-06 DNA damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment Zimmermann, Juergen Hajibabaei, Mehrdad Blackburn, David C Hanken, James Cantin, Elizabeth Posfai, Janos Evans, Thomas C Front Zool Research The extraction of genetic information from preserved tissue samples or museum specimens is a fundamental component of many fields of research, including the Barcode of Life initiative, forensic investigations, biological studies using scat sample analysis, and cancer research utilizing formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Efforts to obtain genetic information from these sources are often hampered by an inability to amplify the desired DNA as a consequence of DNA damage. Previous studies have described techniques for improved DNA extraction from such samples or focused on the effect of damaging agents – such as light, oxygen or formaldehyde – on free nucleotides. We present ongoing work to characterize lesions in DNA samples extracted from preserved specimens. The extracted DNA is digested to single nucleosides with a combination of DNase I, Snake Venom Phosphodiesterase, and Antarctic Phosphatase and then analyzed by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS. We present data for moth specimens that were preserved dried and pinned with no additional preservative and for frog tissue samples that were preserved in either ethanol, or formaldehyde, or fixed in formaldehyde and then preserved in ethanol. These preservation methods represent the most common methods of preserving animal specimens in museum collections. We observe changes in the nucleoside content of these samples over time, especially a loss of deoxyguanosine. We characterize the fragmentation state of the DNA and aim to identify abundant nucleoside lesions. Finally, simple models are introduced to describe the DNA fragmentation based on nicks and double-strand breaks. BioMed Central 2008-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2579423/ /pubmed/18947416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-5-18 Text en Copyright © 2008 Zimmermann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Zimmermann, Juergen
Hajibabaei, Mehrdad
Blackburn, David C
Hanken, James
Cantin, Elizabeth
Posfai, Janos
Evans, Thomas C
DNA damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment
title DNA damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment
title_full DNA damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment
title_fullStr DNA damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment
title_full_unstemmed DNA damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment
title_short DNA damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment
title_sort dna damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2579423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18947416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-5-18
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmermannjuergen dnadamageinpreservedspecimensandtissuesamplesamolecularassessment
AT hajibabaeimehrdad dnadamageinpreservedspecimensandtissuesamplesamolecularassessment
AT blackburndavidc dnadamageinpreservedspecimensandtissuesamplesamolecularassessment
AT hankenjames dnadamageinpreservedspecimensandtissuesamplesamolecularassessment
AT cantinelizabeth dnadamageinpreservedspecimensandtissuesamplesamolecularassessment
AT posfaijanos dnadamageinpreservedspecimensandtissuesamplesamolecularassessment
AT evansthomasc dnadamageinpreservedspecimensandtissuesamplesamolecularassessment