Cargando…
Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results
The quality of gene expression microarray data has improved dramatically since the first arrays were introduced in the late 1990s. However, the reproducibility of data generated at multiple laboratory sites remains a matter of concern, especially for scientists who are attempting to combine and anal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2579585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19009020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003724 |
_version_ | 1782160581440045056 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Hyuna Harrington, Christina A. Vartanian, Kristina Coldren, Christopher D. Hall, Rob Churchill, Gary A. |
author_facet | Yang, Hyuna Harrington, Christina A. Vartanian, Kristina Coldren, Christopher D. Hall, Rob Churchill, Gary A. |
author_sort | Yang, Hyuna |
collection | PubMed |
description | The quality of gene expression microarray data has improved dramatically since the first arrays were introduced in the late 1990s. However, the reproducibility of data generated at multiple laboratory sites remains a matter of concern, especially for scientists who are attempting to combine and analyze data from public repositories. We have carried out a study in which a common set of RNA samples was assayed five times in four different laboratories using Affymetrix GeneChip arrays. We observed dramatic differences in the results across laboratories and identified batch effects in array processing as one of the primary causes for these differences. When batch processing of samples is confounded with experimental factors of interest it is not possible to separate their effects, and lists of differentially expressed genes may include many artifacts. This study demonstrates the substantial impact of sample processing on microarray analysis results and underscores the need for randomization in the laboratory as a means to avoid confounding of biological factors with procedural effects. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2579585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-25795852008-11-14 Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results Yang, Hyuna Harrington, Christina A. Vartanian, Kristina Coldren, Christopher D. Hall, Rob Churchill, Gary A. PLoS One Research Article The quality of gene expression microarray data has improved dramatically since the first arrays were introduced in the late 1990s. However, the reproducibility of data generated at multiple laboratory sites remains a matter of concern, especially for scientists who are attempting to combine and analyze data from public repositories. We have carried out a study in which a common set of RNA samples was assayed five times in four different laboratories using Affymetrix GeneChip arrays. We observed dramatic differences in the results across laboratories and identified batch effects in array processing as one of the primary causes for these differences. When batch processing of samples is confounded with experimental factors of interest it is not possible to separate their effects, and lists of differentially expressed genes may include many artifacts. This study demonstrates the substantial impact of sample processing on microarray analysis results and underscores the need for randomization in the laboratory as a means to avoid confounding of biological factors with procedural effects. Public Library of Science 2008-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2579585/ /pubmed/19009020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003724 Text en Yang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Hyuna Harrington, Christina A. Vartanian, Kristina Coldren, Christopher D. Hall, Rob Churchill, Gary A. Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results |
title | Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results |
title_full | Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results |
title_fullStr | Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results |
title_short | Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results |
title_sort | randomization in laboratory procedure is key to obtaining reproducible microarray results |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2579585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19009020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003724 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanghyuna randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults AT harringtonchristinaa randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults AT vartaniankristina randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults AT coldrenchristopherd randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults AT hallrob randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults AT churchillgarya randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults |