Cargando…

Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results

The quality of gene expression microarray data has improved dramatically since the first arrays were introduced in the late 1990s. However, the reproducibility of data generated at multiple laboratory sites remains a matter of concern, especially for scientists who are attempting to combine and anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Hyuna, Harrington, Christina A., Vartanian, Kristina, Coldren, Christopher D., Hall, Rob, Churchill, Gary A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2579585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19009020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003724
_version_ 1782160581440045056
author Yang, Hyuna
Harrington, Christina A.
Vartanian, Kristina
Coldren, Christopher D.
Hall, Rob
Churchill, Gary A.
author_facet Yang, Hyuna
Harrington, Christina A.
Vartanian, Kristina
Coldren, Christopher D.
Hall, Rob
Churchill, Gary A.
author_sort Yang, Hyuna
collection PubMed
description The quality of gene expression microarray data has improved dramatically since the first arrays were introduced in the late 1990s. However, the reproducibility of data generated at multiple laboratory sites remains a matter of concern, especially for scientists who are attempting to combine and analyze data from public repositories. We have carried out a study in which a common set of RNA samples was assayed five times in four different laboratories using Affymetrix GeneChip arrays. We observed dramatic differences in the results across laboratories and identified batch effects in array processing as one of the primary causes for these differences. When batch processing of samples is confounded with experimental factors of interest it is not possible to separate their effects, and lists of differentially expressed genes may include many artifacts. This study demonstrates the substantial impact of sample processing on microarray analysis results and underscores the need for randomization in the laboratory as a means to avoid confounding of biological factors with procedural effects.
format Text
id pubmed-2579585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25795852008-11-14 Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results Yang, Hyuna Harrington, Christina A. Vartanian, Kristina Coldren, Christopher D. Hall, Rob Churchill, Gary A. PLoS One Research Article The quality of gene expression microarray data has improved dramatically since the first arrays were introduced in the late 1990s. However, the reproducibility of data generated at multiple laboratory sites remains a matter of concern, especially for scientists who are attempting to combine and analyze data from public repositories. We have carried out a study in which a common set of RNA samples was assayed five times in four different laboratories using Affymetrix GeneChip arrays. We observed dramatic differences in the results across laboratories and identified batch effects in array processing as one of the primary causes for these differences. When batch processing of samples is confounded with experimental factors of interest it is not possible to separate their effects, and lists of differentially expressed genes may include many artifacts. This study demonstrates the substantial impact of sample processing on microarray analysis results and underscores the need for randomization in the laboratory as a means to avoid confounding of biological factors with procedural effects. Public Library of Science 2008-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2579585/ /pubmed/19009020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003724 Text en Yang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Hyuna
Harrington, Christina A.
Vartanian, Kristina
Coldren, Christopher D.
Hall, Rob
Churchill, Gary A.
Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results
title Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results
title_full Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results
title_fullStr Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results
title_full_unstemmed Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results
title_short Randomization in Laboratory Procedure Is Key to Obtaining Reproducible Microarray Results
title_sort randomization in laboratory procedure is key to obtaining reproducible microarray results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2579585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19009020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003724
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghyuna randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults
AT harringtonchristinaa randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults
AT vartaniankristina randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults
AT coldrenchristopherd randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults
AT hallrob randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults
AT churchillgarya randomizationinlaboratoryprocedureiskeytoobtainingreproduciblemicroarrayresults