Cargando…

Organ-Preserving Surgery for Penile Carcinoma

Introduction. Penile carcinoma has traditionally been treated by either surgical amputation or radical radiotherapy, both associated with devastating anatomical, functional, and psychological impact on the patient's life. Innovative surgical techniques have focused on penile preservation in wel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, Francisco E., Rodrigues, Raul N., Lopes, Tomé M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2581733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19009032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/634216
_version_ 1782160637516840960
author Martins, Francisco E.
Rodrigues, Raul N.
Lopes, Tomé M.
author_facet Martins, Francisco E.
Rodrigues, Raul N.
Lopes, Tomé M.
author_sort Martins, Francisco E.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Penile carcinoma has traditionally been treated by either surgical amputation or radical radiotherapy, both associated with devastating anatomical, functional, and psychological impact on the patient's life. Innovative surgical techniques have focused on penile preservation in well-selected patients to minimize physical disfigurement and consequently maximize quality of life. The objective of this article is to define the current status of these organ-preserving surgical options for penile carcinoma. Materials and Methods. An extensive review of the Pubmed literature was performed to find articles discussing only reconstructive surgery which have contributed significantly to change traditional, frequently mutilating treatments, to develop less disfiguring surgery, and to improve patients' quality of life over the last two decades. Results. Several articles were included in this analysis in which a major contribution to the change in therapy was thought to have occurred and was documented as beneficial. Some articles reported novel techniques of less-mutilating surgery involving different forms of glans reconstruction with the use of flaps or grafts. The issue of safe surgical margins was also addressed. Conclusion. The development of less-disfiguring techniques allowing phallus preservation has reduced the negative impact on functional and cosmetic outcomes of amputation without sacrificing oncological objectives in appropriately selected patients based on stage, grade, and location of the tumour. Until more prospective studies are available and solid evidence is documented, organ preservation should be offered with caution.
format Text
id pubmed-2581733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-25817332008-11-13 Organ-Preserving Surgery for Penile Carcinoma Martins, Francisco E. Rodrigues, Raul N. Lopes, Tomé M. Adv Urol Review Article Introduction. Penile carcinoma has traditionally been treated by either surgical amputation or radical radiotherapy, both associated with devastating anatomical, functional, and psychological impact on the patient's life. Innovative surgical techniques have focused on penile preservation in well-selected patients to minimize physical disfigurement and consequently maximize quality of life. The objective of this article is to define the current status of these organ-preserving surgical options for penile carcinoma. Materials and Methods. An extensive review of the Pubmed literature was performed to find articles discussing only reconstructive surgery which have contributed significantly to change traditional, frequently mutilating treatments, to develop less disfiguring surgery, and to improve patients' quality of life over the last two decades. Results. Several articles were included in this analysis in which a major contribution to the change in therapy was thought to have occurred and was documented as beneficial. Some articles reported novel techniques of less-mutilating surgery involving different forms of glans reconstruction with the use of flaps or grafts. The issue of safe surgical margins was also addressed. Conclusion. The development of less-disfiguring techniques allowing phallus preservation has reduced the negative impact on functional and cosmetic outcomes of amputation without sacrificing oncological objectives in appropriately selected patients based on stage, grade, and location of the tumour. Until more prospective studies are available and solid evidence is documented, organ preservation should be offered with caution. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2008 2008-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2581733/ /pubmed/19009032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/634216 Text en Copyright © 2008 Francisco E. Martins et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Martins, Francisco E.
Rodrigues, Raul N.
Lopes, Tomé M.
Organ-Preserving Surgery for Penile Carcinoma
title Organ-Preserving Surgery for Penile Carcinoma
title_full Organ-Preserving Surgery for Penile Carcinoma
title_fullStr Organ-Preserving Surgery for Penile Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Organ-Preserving Surgery for Penile Carcinoma
title_short Organ-Preserving Surgery for Penile Carcinoma
title_sort organ-preserving surgery for penile carcinoma
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2581733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19009032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/634216
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsfranciscoe organpreservingsurgeryforpenilecarcinoma
AT rodriguesrauln organpreservingsurgeryforpenilecarcinoma
AT lopestomem organpreservingsurgeryforpenilecarcinoma